{"title":"Ptegopalatine阻滞剂治疗成人疼痛的镇痛效果:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"I. Oleshchenko, T. Iureva, D. Zabolotskii","doi":"10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-2-76-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The use of regional blockades for the purpose of analgesia is widely used in all fields of medicine, however, the analgesic efficacy of the pterygopalatine blockade, as an independent method of treating pain of various genesis, has not been studied enough. Therefore, there is a need to analyze the results of clinical trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of the pterygopalatine blockade as an independent method of anesthesia.Objective — to investigate the analgesic effect of pterygopalatine blockade as a monotherapy in patients with pain of various origins of oculotemporal area, conducting a meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials.Methods. The methodology involved a systematic literature search by means of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library search engines. The search covered the period of the past 10 years and had the following criteria: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study of the use of pterygopalatine blockade with a local anesthetic versus placebo. For each included study, a standardized magnitude of the analgesic effect of pterygopalatine blockade compared to placebo was calculated, with pain assessing in 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the blockade was performed. Meta-analyses were conducted for each endpoint. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 11.0 application programs ((The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom).Results. Five randomized controlled trials involving 269 patients met the inclusion criteria, and involved analyzing the pterygopalatine blockade with local anesthetic (n=140) against placebo (n=129). In 15 minutes after pterygopalatine blockade was performed, the difference in mean pain intensity compared to the control group was -2.5 points, the mean level was lower in the pterygopalatine blockade group, MD=-2.5 [95% CI -3.7; -1.7]. After 30 minutes: -2.7 points, MD=-2.7 [95% CI -4.5; -1.5], after 60 minutes: -1.7 points, MD=-1.7 [95% CI -4.0; -0.5]. The relative risk of adverse effects, such as nasopharyngeal symptoms, after performing a pterygopalatine blockade with a local anesthetic accounted for (RR =1.31 [95% CI 0.5–3.04]). In this regard, the incidence of complications and their variants that can be caused by pterygopalatine blockade is a matter for further clinical research.Conclusion. The results obtained in the meta-analysis testify to the analgesic effect of the pterygopalatine blockade as a monotherapy in patients with pain of different origins oculotemporal area in 15, 30, and 60 minutes after its performance. These data may be relevant when choosing a method for first-line anesthetic management of pain syndrome of oculotemporal area.","PeriodicalId":33483,"journal":{"name":"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Analgetic Efficacy of Pterygopalatine Blockade for Pain Treatment in Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"I. Oleshchenko, T. Iureva, D. Zabolotskii\",\"doi\":\"10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-2-76-88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The use of regional blockades for the purpose of analgesia is widely used in all fields of medicine, however, the analgesic efficacy of the pterygopalatine blockade, as an independent method of treating pain of various genesis, has not been studied enough. Therefore, there is a need to analyze the results of clinical trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of the pterygopalatine blockade as an independent method of anesthesia.Objective — to investigate the analgesic effect of pterygopalatine blockade as a monotherapy in patients with pain of various origins of oculotemporal area, conducting a meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials.Methods. The methodology involved a systematic literature search by means of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library search engines. The search covered the period of the past 10 years and had the following criteria: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study of the use of pterygopalatine blockade with a local anesthetic versus placebo. For each included study, a standardized magnitude of the analgesic effect of pterygopalatine blockade compared to placebo was calculated, with pain assessing in 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the blockade was performed. Meta-analyses were conducted for each endpoint. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 11.0 application programs ((The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom).Results. Five randomized controlled trials involving 269 patients met the inclusion criteria, and involved analyzing the pterygopalatine blockade with local anesthetic (n=140) against placebo (n=129). In 15 minutes after pterygopalatine blockade was performed, the difference in mean pain intensity compared to the control group was -2.5 points, the mean level was lower in the pterygopalatine blockade group, MD=-2.5 [95% CI -3.7; -1.7]. After 30 minutes: -2.7 points, MD=-2.7 [95% CI -4.5; -1.5], after 60 minutes: -1.7 points, MD=-1.7 [95% CI -4.0; -0.5]. The relative risk of adverse effects, such as nasopharyngeal symptoms, after performing a pterygopalatine blockade with a local anesthetic accounted for (RR =1.31 [95% CI 0.5–3.04]). In this regard, the incidence of complications and their variants that can be caused by pterygopalatine blockade is a matter for further clinical research.Conclusion. The results obtained in the meta-analysis testify to the analgesic effect of the pterygopalatine blockade as a monotherapy in patients with pain of different origins oculotemporal area in 15, 30, and 60 minutes after its performance. These data may be relevant when choosing a method for first-line anesthetic management of pain syndrome of oculotemporal area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-2-76-88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-2-76-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。局部阻断镇痛的应用已广泛应用于医学的各个领域,然而翼状腭氨酸阻断作为一种独立治疗各种原因疼痛的方法,其镇痛效果的研究还不够。因此,有必要对临床试验结果进行分析,以评价翼腭氨酸阻断剂作为独立麻醉方法的镇痛效果。目的:通过对已发表的随机临床试验结果进行荟萃分析,探讨翼状腭碱阻滞剂作为单一疗法对不同来源的眼颞区疼痛患者的镇痛效果。方法包括通过PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆搜索引擎进行系统的文献检索。这项研究涵盖了过去10年的时间,并有以下标准:一项双盲、随机、对照研究,将翼腭碱阻断剂与局部麻醉剂与安慰剂联合使用。对于每一项纳入的研究,计算翼状腭碱阻断剂与安慰剂相比镇痛效果的标准化程度,并在阻断后15分钟、30分钟和60分钟评估疼痛。对每个终点进行meta分析。meta分析采用Stata 11.0应用程序(The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom)。5项随机对照试验纳入269例患者,符合纳入标准,并分析了局麻药(n=140)与安慰剂(n=129)的翼状腭氨酸阻断。翼状腭碱阻断治疗后15分钟,平均疼痛强度与对照组的差异为-2.5分,翼状腭碱阻断组的平均水平较低,MD=-2.5 [95% CI -3.7;-1.7]。30分钟后:-2.7分,MD=-2.7 [95% CI -4.5;-1.5分],60分钟后:-1.7分,MD=-1.7 [95% CI -4.0;-0.5]。用局麻药进行翼腭肽阻断后出现鼻咽症状等不良反应的相对风险(RR =1.31 [95% CI 0.5-3.04])。因此,翼状腭氨酸阻断术引起的并发症及其变异的发生率有待于进一步的临床研究。meta分析的结果证实了翼状腭碱阻滞剂作为单一疗法对不同来源的眼颞区疼痛患者在15、30和60分钟后的镇痛效果。这些数据可能与选择眼颞区疼痛综合征的一线麻醉治疗方法有关。
The Analgetic Efficacy of Pterygopalatine Blockade for Pain Treatment in Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background. The use of regional blockades for the purpose of analgesia is widely used in all fields of medicine, however, the analgesic efficacy of the pterygopalatine blockade, as an independent method of treating pain of various genesis, has not been studied enough. Therefore, there is a need to analyze the results of clinical trials to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of the pterygopalatine blockade as an independent method of anesthesia.Objective — to investigate the analgesic effect of pterygopalatine blockade as a monotherapy in patients with pain of various origins of oculotemporal area, conducting a meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials.Methods. The methodology involved a systematic literature search by means of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library search engines. The search covered the period of the past 10 years and had the following criteria: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study of the use of pterygopalatine blockade with a local anesthetic versus placebo. For each included study, a standardized magnitude of the analgesic effect of pterygopalatine blockade compared to placebo was calculated, with pain assessing in 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the blockade was performed. Meta-analyses were conducted for each endpoint. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 11.0 application programs ((The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom).Results. Five randomized controlled trials involving 269 patients met the inclusion criteria, and involved analyzing the pterygopalatine blockade with local anesthetic (n=140) against placebo (n=129). In 15 minutes after pterygopalatine blockade was performed, the difference in mean pain intensity compared to the control group was -2.5 points, the mean level was lower in the pterygopalatine blockade group, MD=-2.5 [95% CI -3.7; -1.7]. After 30 minutes: -2.7 points, MD=-2.7 [95% CI -4.5; -1.5], after 60 minutes: -1.7 points, MD=-1.7 [95% CI -4.0; -0.5]. The relative risk of adverse effects, such as nasopharyngeal symptoms, after performing a pterygopalatine blockade with a local anesthetic accounted for (RR =1.31 [95% CI 0.5–3.04]). In this regard, the incidence of complications and their variants that can be caused by pterygopalatine blockade is a matter for further clinical research.Conclusion. The results obtained in the meta-analysis testify to the analgesic effect of the pterygopalatine blockade as a monotherapy in patients with pain of different origins oculotemporal area in 15, 30, and 60 minutes after its performance. These data may be relevant when choosing a method for first-line anesthetic management of pain syndrome of oculotemporal area.