COVID-19大流行中风湿病从业者的学术出版活动和观点

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Archives of rheumatology Pub Date : 2023-02-16 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9957
Abdulvahap Kahveci, Alper Gümüştepe, Nurhan Güven, İsmihan Sunar, Şebnem Ataman
{"title":"COVID-19大流行中风湿病从业者的学术出版活动和观点","authors":"Abdulvahap Kahveci, Alper Gümüştepe, Nurhan Güven, İsmihan Sunar, Şebnem Ataman","doi":"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the research, publication activities, and perspectives on clinical practices of rheumatology practitioners during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The survey-based cross-sectional study was designed online and included 24 closed-ended questions. After performing a pilot test and validation of survey, it was conducted among clinicians between September 2021 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred fifteen clinicians (54 males, 61 females; 78.1% in rheumatology practice for at least five years) responded to the survey. The respondents indicated that they worked in coronavirus-related departments, comprising inpatient service (50.4%), consultancy (42.6%), and outpatient clinic (27.8%). Around 40% of clinicians stated they spent less time on scientific research (43.1%) and clinical learning activities (43.2%), while almost the same proportion of them spent more (41.1% and 45.0%, respectively). This study revealed that 53.5% published at least one paper covering mostly COVID-19 in the scientific citation index (SCI) or SCI-expanded (SCI-E) indexed journals. However, nearly half of them did not have any papers published in the SCI/SCI-E (46.5%) or non-SCI/SCI-E indexed (44.6%) journals. Regarding the perspectives of clinicians about clinical practices, they considered fewer biological (57.0%) and nonbiological (55.0%) drug usage, reported fewer outpatient clinic visits (88.2%), more newly diagnosed rheumatic diseases (62.5%), and more disease exacerbations (31.2%). Most of the clinicians (range, 76.2 to 86.3%) thought they accurately managed their patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians published mostly coronavirus-related papers in the pandemic era, and in the self-assessment, clinicians thought that they correctly manage their patients. In addition, this study reflected the frequency of academic publications and clinicians' work routines during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":8328,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic publication activities and perspectives of rheumatology practitioners in the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulvahap Kahveci, Alper Gümüştepe, Nurhan Güven, İsmihan Sunar, Şebnem Ataman\",\"doi\":\"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the research, publication activities, and perspectives on clinical practices of rheumatology practitioners during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The survey-based cross-sectional study was designed online and included 24 closed-ended questions. After performing a pilot test and validation of survey, it was conducted among clinicians between September 2021 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred fifteen clinicians (54 males, 61 females; 78.1% in rheumatology practice for at least five years) responded to the survey. The respondents indicated that they worked in coronavirus-related departments, comprising inpatient service (50.4%), consultancy (42.6%), and outpatient clinic (27.8%). Around 40% of clinicians stated they spent less time on scientific research (43.1%) and clinical learning activities (43.2%), while almost the same proportion of them spent more (41.1% and 45.0%, respectively). This study revealed that 53.5% published at least one paper covering mostly COVID-19 in the scientific citation index (SCI) or SCI-expanded (SCI-E) indexed journals. However, nearly half of them did not have any papers published in the SCI/SCI-E (46.5%) or non-SCI/SCI-E indexed (44.6%) journals. Regarding the perspectives of clinicians about clinical practices, they considered fewer biological (57.0%) and nonbiological (55.0%) drug usage, reported fewer outpatient clinic visits (88.2%), more newly diagnosed rheumatic diseases (62.5%), and more disease exacerbations (31.2%). Most of the clinicians (range, 76.2 to 86.3%) thought they accurately managed their patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians published mostly coronavirus-related papers in the pandemic era, and in the self-assessment, clinicians thought that they correctly manage their patients. In addition, this study reflected the frequency of academic publications and clinicians' work routines during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9957\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间风湿病医生的研究、发表活动和临床实践观点。材料与方法:基于调查的横断面研究采用在线设计,包括24个封闭式问题。在进行试点测试和调查验证后,于2021年9月至2021年12月在临床医生中进行了调查。结果:临床医生115名,其中男性54名,女性61名;78.1%在风湿病学实践至少5年)回应了调查。受访者表示,他们在与冠状病毒相关的部门工作,包括住院服务(50.4%)、咨询(42.6%)和门诊(27.8%)。约40%的临床医生表示他们花在科研(43.1%)和临床学习活动(43.2%)上的时间较少,而几乎相同比例的临床医生花在临床学习活动上的时间较多(分别为41.1%和45.0%)。研究发现,53.5%的人在SCI或SCI-e索引期刊上发表了至少一篇以COVID-19为主要内容的论文。然而,近一半的人(46.5%)没有在SCI/SCI- e或非SCI/SCI- e索引期刊上发表过论文(44.6%)。关于临床医生对临床实践的看法,他们认为较少的生物(57.0%)和非生物(55.0%)药物使用,较少的门诊就诊(88.2%),更多的新诊断的风湿病(62.5%)和更多的疾病加重(31.2%)。大多数临床医生(范围为76.2至86.3%)认为他们在COVID-19大流行期间准确地管理了患者。结论:大流行时期临床医生发表的冠状病毒相关论文居多,自我评估中临床医生认为自己对患者的管理是正确的。此外,该研究反映了大流行期间学术出版物的频率和临床医生的工作惯例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic publication activities and perspectives of rheumatology practitioners in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the research, publication activities, and perspectives on clinical practices of rheumatology practitioners during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Materials and methods: The survey-based cross-sectional study was designed online and included 24 closed-ended questions. After performing a pilot test and validation of survey, it was conducted among clinicians between September 2021 and December 2021.

Results: One-hundred fifteen clinicians (54 males, 61 females; 78.1% in rheumatology practice for at least five years) responded to the survey. The respondents indicated that they worked in coronavirus-related departments, comprising inpatient service (50.4%), consultancy (42.6%), and outpatient clinic (27.8%). Around 40% of clinicians stated they spent less time on scientific research (43.1%) and clinical learning activities (43.2%), while almost the same proportion of them spent more (41.1% and 45.0%, respectively). This study revealed that 53.5% published at least one paper covering mostly COVID-19 in the scientific citation index (SCI) or SCI-expanded (SCI-E) indexed journals. However, nearly half of them did not have any papers published in the SCI/SCI-E (46.5%) or non-SCI/SCI-E indexed (44.6%) journals. Regarding the perspectives of clinicians about clinical practices, they considered fewer biological (57.0%) and nonbiological (55.0%) drug usage, reported fewer outpatient clinic visits (88.2%), more newly diagnosed rheumatic diseases (62.5%), and more disease exacerbations (31.2%). Most of the clinicians (range, 76.2 to 86.3%) thought they accurately managed their patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion: Clinicians published mostly coronavirus-related papers in the pandemic era, and in the self-assessment, clinicians thought that they correctly manage their patients. In addition, this study reflected the frequency of academic publications and clinicians' work routines during the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of rheumatology
Archives of rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Archives of Rheumatology is an official journal of the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) and is published quarterly in March, June, September, and December. It publishes original work on all aspects of rheumatology and disorders of the musculoskeletal system. The priority of the Archives of Rheumatology is to publish high-quality original research articles, especially in inflammatory rheumatic disorders. In addition to research articles, brief reports, reviews, editorials, letters to the editor can also be published. It is an independent peer-reviewed international journal printed in English. Manuscripts are refereed by a "double-blind peer-reviewed" process for both referees and authors. Editorial Board of the Archives of Rheumatology works under the principles of The World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), the International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Pandemic of the century: COVID-19 in inflammatory rheumatic diseases of a national cohort with 3,532 patients Biological treatment in elderly and young patients with ankylosing spondylitis: TURKBIO real-life data results Alarming serum antiprotease levels in axial spondyloarthritis Can serum granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and CCL17 levels be a marker of disease activation in spondyloarthritis? COVID-19 vaccination rates and factors affecting vaccination in children with rheumatic disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1