海洋养殖——海藻是气候的快速解决方案?

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI:10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792
M. Troell, P. Henriksson, A. Buschmann, T. Chopin, S. Quahe
{"title":"海洋养殖——海藻是气候的快速解决方案?","authors":"M. Troell, P. Henriksson, A. Buschmann, T. Chopin, S. Quahe","doi":"10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Finding ways to keep global warming under 1.5 degrees Celsius is urgent and will need a portfolio of solutions. Seaweeds are marine photosynthetic organisms that humans harvest either from the wild or farm, to be used in many applications and providing various ecosystem services. Large scale farming of seaweeds for absorbing carbon has lately been promoted as a climate “fix”. The major shortcomings of this argument relate to the idea that a carbon sink function should exist through carbon accumulation in seaweed biomass simultaneously as seaweeds are consumed as food by humans, fed to animals, or used in many alternative applications. This carbon instead enters the fast carbon cycle and does not provide any “carbon sink” function. Radical suggestions of intentionally transfer of farmed seaweeds to the deep-sea to accomplish a longer removal are highly questionable from feasibility, economic, ecosystem effects and ethical resource use perspectives. Development of “ocean forests” for carbon capturing through farming should not be compared to forests on land as these provide carbon removal from the atmosphere at sufficiently long time scales to be qualified as carbon sequestration - thus making a difference related to reducing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Seaweeds can, however, play a role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the overall food system through carbon offset - i.e. if replacing food, feed, and/or materials that have larger carbon footprints. The fate/cycling of carbon as particulate and dissolved matter from both farmed and wild seaweeds, are however not fully understood, especially with respect to pathways and time scales relevant for carbon removal/storage. Another potential pathway for their role in decarbonization may be through reducing enteric methane emissions from ruminants and also through bioenergy production. More research is, however, needed for understanding the contributions from such interventions. Presenting seaweed farming as a quick fix for the climate risks facilitating misdirected investments (for carbon abatement solutions) and reducing demand for specific research and technological development that will be needed for increasing our understanding about seaweeds’ contribution to food/feed systems and additional sustainability services and benefits. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792 .","PeriodicalId":21183,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture","volume":"31 1","pages":"285 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farming the Ocean – Seaweeds as a Quick Fix for the Climate?\",\"authors\":\"M. Troell, P. Henriksson, A. Buschmann, T. Chopin, S. Quahe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Finding ways to keep global warming under 1.5 degrees Celsius is urgent and will need a portfolio of solutions. Seaweeds are marine photosynthetic organisms that humans harvest either from the wild or farm, to be used in many applications and providing various ecosystem services. Large scale farming of seaweeds for absorbing carbon has lately been promoted as a climate “fix”. The major shortcomings of this argument relate to the idea that a carbon sink function should exist through carbon accumulation in seaweed biomass simultaneously as seaweeds are consumed as food by humans, fed to animals, or used in many alternative applications. This carbon instead enters the fast carbon cycle and does not provide any “carbon sink” function. Radical suggestions of intentionally transfer of farmed seaweeds to the deep-sea to accomplish a longer removal are highly questionable from feasibility, economic, ecosystem effects and ethical resource use perspectives. Development of “ocean forests” for carbon capturing through farming should not be compared to forests on land as these provide carbon removal from the atmosphere at sufficiently long time scales to be qualified as carbon sequestration - thus making a difference related to reducing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Seaweeds can, however, play a role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the overall food system through carbon offset - i.e. if replacing food, feed, and/or materials that have larger carbon footprints. The fate/cycling of carbon as particulate and dissolved matter from both farmed and wild seaweeds, are however not fully understood, especially with respect to pathways and time scales relevant for carbon removal/storage. Another potential pathway for their role in decarbonization may be through reducing enteric methane emissions from ruminants and also through bioenergy production. More research is, however, needed for understanding the contributions from such interventions. Presenting seaweed farming as a quick fix for the climate risks facilitating misdirected investments (for carbon abatement solutions) and reducing demand for specific research and technological development that will be needed for increasing our understanding about seaweeds’ contribution to food/feed systems and additional sustainability services and benefits. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":21183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"285 - 295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

摘要找到将全球变暖控制在1.5摄氏度以下的方法是当务之急,需要一系列解决方案。海藻是人类从野外或农场收获的海洋光合生物,可用于许多应用并提供各种生态系统服务。大规模种植海藻以吸收碳最近被宣传为气候“修复”措施。这一论点的主要缺点与这样一种观点有关,即在海藻被人类作为食物、喂养动物或用于许多替代应用的同时,碳汇功能应该通过海藻生物量中的碳积累而存在。这种碳反而进入了快速碳循环,不提供任何“碳汇”功能。从可行性、经济、生态系统影响和资源使用伦理角度来看,有意将养殖海藻转移到深海以实现更长时间清除的激进建议非常值得怀疑。不应将通过农业捕获碳的“海洋森林”的开发与陆地上的森林进行比较,因为这些森林可以在足够长的时间内从大气中去除碳,从而符合碳固存的资格,从而在降低大气温室气体浓度方面发挥作用。然而,海藻可以通过碳抵消在减少整个食品系统的温室气体排放方面发挥作用,即如果取代碳足迹较大的食品、饲料和/或材料。然而,人们对养殖和野生海藻中碳作为颗粒物和溶解物的命运/循环还没有完全了解,尤其是在与碳去除/储存相关的途径和时间尺度方面。它们在脱碳中发挥作用的另一个潜在途径可能是减少反刍动物的肠道甲烷排放,也可以通过生物能源生产。然而,需要更多的研究来了解这种干预措施的贡献。将海藻养殖作为气候风险的快速解决方案,有助于误导投资(碳减排解决方案),并减少对特定研究和技术开发的需求,这将是提高我们对海藻对粮食/饲料系统的贡献以及额外可持续性服务和效益的理解所必需的。本文的补充数据可在线获取,网址为https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Farming the Ocean – Seaweeds as a Quick Fix for the Climate?
Abstract Finding ways to keep global warming under 1.5 degrees Celsius is urgent and will need a portfolio of solutions. Seaweeds are marine photosynthetic organisms that humans harvest either from the wild or farm, to be used in many applications and providing various ecosystem services. Large scale farming of seaweeds for absorbing carbon has lately been promoted as a climate “fix”. The major shortcomings of this argument relate to the idea that a carbon sink function should exist through carbon accumulation in seaweed biomass simultaneously as seaweeds are consumed as food by humans, fed to animals, or used in many alternative applications. This carbon instead enters the fast carbon cycle and does not provide any “carbon sink” function. Radical suggestions of intentionally transfer of farmed seaweeds to the deep-sea to accomplish a longer removal are highly questionable from feasibility, economic, ecosystem effects and ethical resource use perspectives. Development of “ocean forests” for carbon capturing through farming should not be compared to forests on land as these provide carbon removal from the atmosphere at sufficiently long time scales to be qualified as carbon sequestration - thus making a difference related to reducing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Seaweeds can, however, play a role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the overall food system through carbon offset - i.e. if replacing food, feed, and/or materials that have larger carbon footprints. The fate/cycling of carbon as particulate and dissolved matter from both farmed and wild seaweeds, are however not fully understood, especially with respect to pathways and time scales relevant for carbon removal/storage. Another potential pathway for their role in decarbonization may be through reducing enteric methane emissions from ruminants and also through bioenergy production. More research is, however, needed for understanding the contributions from such interventions. Presenting seaweed farming as a quick fix for the climate risks facilitating misdirected investments (for carbon abatement solutions) and reducing demand for specific research and technological development that will be needed for increasing our understanding about seaweeds’ contribution to food/feed systems and additional sustainability services and benefits. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2048792 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture provides an important forum for the publication of up-to-date reviews covering a broad range of subject areas including management, aquaculture, taxonomy, behavior, stock identification, genetics, nutrition, and physiology. Issues concerning finfish and aquatic invertebrates prized for their economic or recreational importance, their value as indicators of environmental health, or their natural beauty are addressed. An important resource that keeps you apprised of the latest changes in the field, each issue of Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture presents useful information to fisheries and aquaculture scientists in academia, state and federal natural resources agencies, and the private sector.
期刊最新文献
Fish for Health: Role of Fish in Global Food and Animal Protein Supply Research in Aquaculture Nutrition: What Makes an Experimental Feeding Trial Successful? Reestablishing Histopathology as an Essential Component of Health Assessment for Farmed Shrimp in the Era of Molecular Diagnostics Understanding the Threats to Fish Migration: Applying the Global Swimways Concept to the Lower Mekong Ecosystem Services Provided by Seaweed Cultivation: State of the Art, Knowledge Gaps, Constraints and Future Needs for Achieving Maximum Potential in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1