异丙酚和七氟醚麻醉中苯妥英和苯妥英静注对血流动力学的影响及QTc的变化

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1758483
K. R. Maremanda, Singam Geetha, B. S. Reddy, P. Durga, Kolli L. Bramarambha
{"title":"异丙酚和七氟醚麻醉中苯妥英和苯妥英静注对血流动力学的影响及QTc的变化","authors":"K. R. Maremanda, Singam Geetha, B. S. Reddy, P. Durga, Kolli L. Bramarambha","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Phenytoin is a commonly used antiepileptic drug (AED) for postoperative seizure prophylaxis; it is associated with adverse cardiovascular effects. Fosphenytoin is considered a safer alternative but can produce prolongation of QT interval. This hypothesis generating pilot study evaluated the changes in hemodynamics and the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) with phenytoin and fosphenytoin during propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods  Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients aged 20 to 60 years undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy requiring a loading dose of the intraoperative AED for seizure prophylaxis were randomized into four groups: group PP, receiving propofol (0.2 mg/kg/min) for maintenance and phenytoin (15 mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; group SP, receiving sevoflurane (1 minimal alveolar concentration) for maintenance and phenytoin(15mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; group PF, receiving propofol for maintenance and fosphenytoin (22.5 mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; and group SF, receiving sevoflurane for maintenance and fosphenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. The heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, and QTc were measured at baseline before anesthesia, during maintenance of anesthesia, and during various phases of AED infusion and up to 1 hour after completion of AED administration. Appropriate statistical analysis was done and a two-tailed p -value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results  The incidence of changes in the heart rate and hypotension was not significant among the groups. Administration of fosphenytoin significantly prolonged QTc, which was more remarkable when coadministered with sevoflurane than with phenytoin. Conclusion  Fosphenytoin did not confer hemodynamic benefits over phenytoin. Fosphenytoin produces prolongation of QTc, and when coadministered with sevoflurane, the prolongation is more significant, suggesting a possible additive effect.","PeriodicalId":16574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic Effects and QTc Changes with Intravenous Phenytoin and Fosphenytoin during Propofol and Sevoflurane Anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"K. R. Maremanda, Singam Geetha, B. S. Reddy, P. Durga, Kolli L. Bramarambha\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1758483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background  Phenytoin is a commonly used antiepileptic drug (AED) for postoperative seizure prophylaxis; it is associated with adverse cardiovascular effects. Fosphenytoin is considered a safer alternative but can produce prolongation of QT interval. This hypothesis generating pilot study evaluated the changes in hemodynamics and the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) with phenytoin and fosphenytoin during propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods  Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients aged 20 to 60 years undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy requiring a loading dose of the intraoperative AED for seizure prophylaxis were randomized into four groups: group PP, receiving propofol (0.2 mg/kg/min) for maintenance and phenytoin (15 mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; group SP, receiving sevoflurane (1 minimal alveolar concentration) for maintenance and phenytoin(15mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; group PF, receiving propofol for maintenance and fosphenytoin (22.5 mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; and group SF, receiving sevoflurane for maintenance and fosphenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. The heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, and QTc were measured at baseline before anesthesia, during maintenance of anesthesia, and during various phases of AED infusion and up to 1 hour after completion of AED administration. Appropriate statistical analysis was done and a two-tailed p -value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results  The incidence of changes in the heart rate and hypotension was not significant among the groups. Administration of fosphenytoin significantly prolonged QTc, which was more remarkable when coadministered with sevoflurane than with phenytoin. Conclusion  Fosphenytoin did not confer hemodynamic benefits over phenytoin. Fosphenytoin produces prolongation of QTc, and when coadministered with sevoflurane, the prolongation is more significant, suggesting a possible additive effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景 苯妥英钠是一种常用的抗癫痫药物(AED),用于预防术后癫痫发作;它与不良心血管影响有关。Fosphenytoin被认为是一种更安全的替代品,但可以延长QT间期。这项产生假设的初步研究评估了丙泊酚和七氟醚麻醉期间,苯妥英和磷妥英对血液动力学和心率校正QT间期(QTc)的影响。方法 80名年龄在20至60岁的美国麻醉师协会I和II期患者接受选择性幕上开颅术,需要术中AED的负荷剂量来预防癫痫发作,他们被随机分为四组:PP组,接受丙泊酚(0.2 mg/kg/min)和苯妥英(15 mg/kg)用于癫痫预防;SP组,给予七氟醚(最低肺泡浓度1)维持治疗,苯妥英(15mg/kg)预防癫痫发作;PF组,接受丙泊酚维持和磷妥英(22.5 mg/kg)用于癫痫预防;SF组接受七氟烷维持治疗和磷妥英预防癫痫发作。在麻醉前、麻醉维持期间、AED输注的各个阶段以及AED给药完成后1小时内,在基线测量心率、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压和QTc。进行了适当的统计分析,双尾p值小于0.05被认为是显著的。后果 心率变化和低血压的发生率在各组之间并不显著。磷妥英给药显著延长QTc,与七氟醚联合给药比与苯妥英联合给药更显著。结论 与苯妥英相比,Fosphenytoin并未带来血液动力学益处。Fosphenytoin使QTc延长,当与七氟醚联合给药时,QTc延长更显著,这表明可能存在加性效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hemodynamic Effects and QTc Changes with Intravenous Phenytoin and Fosphenytoin during Propofol and Sevoflurane Anesthesia
Abstract Background  Phenytoin is a commonly used antiepileptic drug (AED) for postoperative seizure prophylaxis; it is associated with adverse cardiovascular effects. Fosphenytoin is considered a safer alternative but can produce prolongation of QT interval. This hypothesis generating pilot study evaluated the changes in hemodynamics and the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) with phenytoin and fosphenytoin during propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods  Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients aged 20 to 60 years undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy requiring a loading dose of the intraoperative AED for seizure prophylaxis were randomized into four groups: group PP, receiving propofol (0.2 mg/kg/min) for maintenance and phenytoin (15 mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; group SP, receiving sevoflurane (1 minimal alveolar concentration) for maintenance and phenytoin(15mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; group PF, receiving propofol for maintenance and fosphenytoin (22.5 mg/kg) for seizure prophylaxis; and group SF, receiving sevoflurane for maintenance and fosphenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. The heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, and QTc were measured at baseline before anesthesia, during maintenance of anesthesia, and during various phases of AED infusion and up to 1 hour after completion of AED administration. Appropriate statistical analysis was done and a two-tailed p -value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results  The incidence of changes in the heart rate and hypotension was not significant among the groups. Administration of fosphenytoin significantly prolonged QTc, which was more remarkable when coadministered with sevoflurane than with phenytoin. Conclusion  Fosphenytoin did not confer hemodynamic benefits over phenytoin. Fosphenytoin produces prolongation of QTc, and when coadministered with sevoflurane, the prolongation is more significant, suggesting a possible additive effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic Challenges in Hirayama Disease Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery—A Case Series Management and Outcomes of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Associated with Vasospasm Post Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the National Neurosurgical Center in Ireland Chronic Epidural Hematoma in an Elderly Patient: A Rare Encounter!! The Emerging Role of Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) Technique and C-MAC Videolaryngoscope for Difficult Airway Management in a Patient with Klippel–Feil Syndrome: A Case Report Intense Noxious Stimulus during an Adequate Depth of General Anesthesia Produces a Transient Burst Suppression Pattern in a Density Spectral Array
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1