民主化摄影测量:精度视角

Jie Shan, Zhixin Li, Damon J. Lercel, Kevan Tissue, J. Hupy, Joshua Carpenter
{"title":"民主化摄影测量:精度视角","authors":"Jie Shan, Zhixin Li, Damon J. Lercel, Kevan Tissue, J. Hupy, Joshua Carpenter","doi":"10.1080/10095020.2023.2178336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Photogrammetry is experiencing an era of democratization mostly due to the popularity and availability of many commercial off-the-shelf devices, such as drones and smartphones. They are used as the most convenient and effective tools for high-resolution image acquisition for a wide range of applications in science, engineering, management, and cultural heritage. However, the quality, particularly the geometric accuracy, of the outcomes from such consumer sensors is still unclear. Furthermore, the expected quality under different control schemes has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This paper intends to answer those questions with a comprehensive comparative evaluation. Photogrammetry, in particular, structure from motion, has been used to reconstruct a 3D building model from smartphone and consumer drone images, as well as from professional drone images, all under various ground control schemes. Results from this study show that the positioning accuracy of smartphone images under direct geo-referencing is 165.4 cm, however, this could be improved to 43.3 cm and 14.5 cm when introducing aerial lidar data and total station surveys as ground control, respectively. Similar results are found for consumer drone images as well. For comparison, this study shows the use of the professional drone is able to achieve a positioning accuracy of 3.7 cm. Furthermore, we demonstrate that through the combined use of drone and smartphone images we are able to obtain full coverage of the entire target with a 2.3 cm positioning accuracy. Our study concludes that smartphone images can achieve an accuracy equivalent to consumer drone images and can be used as the primary data source for building facade data collection.","PeriodicalId":58518,"journal":{"name":"武测译文","volume":"26 1","pages":"175 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratizing photogrammetry: an accuracy perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jie Shan, Zhixin Li, Damon J. Lercel, Kevan Tissue, J. Hupy, Joshua Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10095020.2023.2178336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Photogrammetry is experiencing an era of democratization mostly due to the popularity and availability of many commercial off-the-shelf devices, such as drones and smartphones. They are used as the most convenient and effective tools for high-resolution image acquisition for a wide range of applications in science, engineering, management, and cultural heritage. However, the quality, particularly the geometric accuracy, of the outcomes from such consumer sensors is still unclear. Furthermore, the expected quality under different control schemes has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This paper intends to answer those questions with a comprehensive comparative evaluation. Photogrammetry, in particular, structure from motion, has been used to reconstruct a 3D building model from smartphone and consumer drone images, as well as from professional drone images, all under various ground control schemes. Results from this study show that the positioning accuracy of smartphone images under direct geo-referencing is 165.4 cm, however, this could be improved to 43.3 cm and 14.5 cm when introducing aerial lidar data and total station surveys as ground control, respectively. Similar results are found for consumer drone images as well. For comparison, this study shows the use of the professional drone is able to achieve a positioning accuracy of 3.7 cm. Furthermore, we demonstrate that through the combined use of drone and smartphone images we are able to obtain full coverage of the entire target with a 2.3 cm positioning accuracy. Our study concludes that smartphone images can achieve an accuracy equivalent to consumer drone images and can be used as the primary data source for building facade data collection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":58518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"武测译文\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"175 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"武测译文\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2023.2178336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"武测译文","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2023.2178336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摄影测量学正在经历一个民主化的时代,这主要是由于许多商业现成设备的普及和可用性,如无人机和智能手机。它们是在科学、工程、管理和文化遗产领域广泛应用的最方便、最有效的高分辨率图像采集工具。然而,这种消费者传感器的质量,特别是几何精度,仍然不清楚。此外,不同控制方案下的预期质量还有待深入研究。本文试图通过全面的比较评价来回答这些问题。摄影测量学,特别是运动结构,已用于从智能手机和消费者无人机图像重建3D建筑模型,以及专业无人机图像,所有这些都在各种地面控制方案下。研究结果表明,在直接地理参考条件下,智能手机图像的定位精度为165.4 cm,而在引入航空激光雷达数据和全站仪测量作为地面控制时,定位精度分别可以提高到43.3 cm和14.5 cm。类似的结果也适用于消费级无人机图像。为了比较,本研究表明,使用专业无人机能够实现3.7厘米的定位精度。此外,我们证明,通过结合使用无人机和智能手机图像,我们能够以2.3厘米的定位精度获得整个目标的全覆盖。我们的研究得出结论,智能手机图像可以达到与消费者无人机图像相当的精度,可以用作建筑立面数据收集的主要数据源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Democratizing photogrammetry: an accuracy perspective
ABSTRACT Photogrammetry is experiencing an era of democratization mostly due to the popularity and availability of many commercial off-the-shelf devices, such as drones and smartphones. They are used as the most convenient and effective tools for high-resolution image acquisition for a wide range of applications in science, engineering, management, and cultural heritage. However, the quality, particularly the geometric accuracy, of the outcomes from such consumer sensors is still unclear. Furthermore, the expected quality under different control schemes has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This paper intends to answer those questions with a comprehensive comparative evaluation. Photogrammetry, in particular, structure from motion, has been used to reconstruct a 3D building model from smartphone and consumer drone images, as well as from professional drone images, all under various ground control schemes. Results from this study show that the positioning accuracy of smartphone images under direct geo-referencing is 165.4 cm, however, this could be improved to 43.3 cm and 14.5 cm when introducing aerial lidar data and total station surveys as ground control, respectively. Similar results are found for consumer drone images as well. For comparison, this study shows the use of the professional drone is able to achieve a positioning accuracy of 3.7 cm. Furthermore, we demonstrate that through the combined use of drone and smartphone images we are able to obtain full coverage of the entire target with a 2.3 cm positioning accuracy. Our study concludes that smartphone images can achieve an accuracy equivalent to consumer drone images and can be used as the primary data source for building facade data collection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current and potential use of augmented reality in (geographic) citizen science projects: a survey Innovative remote sensing methodologies and applications in coastal and marine environments Glacier melt detection at different sites of Greenland ice sheet using dual-polarized Sentinel-1 images Estimating pedestrian traffic with Bluetooth sensor technology Tightly coupled multi-frequency PPP-RTK/INS integration model and its application in an urban environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1