黑人百人会与俄罗斯东正教神职人员

S. A. Stepanov
{"title":"黑人百人会与俄罗斯东正教神职人员","authors":"S. A. Stepanov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2021.1916322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Black Hundreds unions positioned themselves as committed champions and defenders of Russian Orthodoxy. The Black Hundreds’ ideology was based on the three-part formula of “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationhood,” formulated by S.S. Uvarov and M.P. Pogodin during the reign of Nicholas I. The ideologues of the extreme right emphasized that the Russian people were tied by indestructible bonds to Orthodoxy—“the sole true, apostolic, and paternalistic church.” The monarchists conducted their processions under gonfalons, every branch had icons, and meetings and rallies began with prayers. Congresses of “Russians” were accompanied by ceremonial prayer services. The extreme rightists’ close ties to the Russian Orthodox Church were so obvious that Soviet historiography equated the Orthodox clergy with the Black Hundreds. Up to the end of the 1920s, a good number of articles and pamphlets were published about the ties between the Black Hundreds and the Church that had a sharply anticlerical tone. These works treated the Orthodox Church as a reactionary force that was the main pillar of the Black Hundreds movement. Paradoxically, the concept of total identification of the extreme right with the Orthodox clergy still exists today, but it has merely replaced a negative assessment with a solely positive one. Works published by the Institute of Russian Civilization present the “holy Black Hundreds,” consisting of zealots and martyrs who gave their lives for the Orthodox faith during the revolution and the Civil War. It would be wrong to suggest, however, that the entire Orthodox clergy during the prerevolutionary period supported the extreme right. By the same token, one cannot say that the extreme right relied solely on Orthodox clergymen. The Black Hundreds did not shun cooperation with other religions. The Union of the Russian People in its “Founding Principles,” a kind of symbol of faith, stated that “non-Orthodox and","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"59 1","pages":"124 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Black Hundreds and the Russian Orthodox Clergy\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Stepanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611983.2021.1916322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Black Hundreds unions positioned themselves as committed champions and defenders of Russian Orthodoxy. The Black Hundreds’ ideology was based on the three-part formula of “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationhood,” formulated by S.S. Uvarov and M.P. Pogodin during the reign of Nicholas I. The ideologues of the extreme right emphasized that the Russian people were tied by indestructible bonds to Orthodoxy—“the sole true, apostolic, and paternalistic church.” The monarchists conducted their processions under gonfalons, every branch had icons, and meetings and rallies began with prayers. Congresses of “Russians” were accompanied by ceremonial prayer services. The extreme rightists’ close ties to the Russian Orthodox Church were so obvious that Soviet historiography equated the Orthodox clergy with the Black Hundreds. Up to the end of the 1920s, a good number of articles and pamphlets were published about the ties between the Black Hundreds and the Church that had a sharply anticlerical tone. These works treated the Orthodox Church as a reactionary force that was the main pillar of the Black Hundreds movement. Paradoxically, the concept of total identification of the extreme right with the Orthodox clergy still exists today, but it has merely replaced a negative assessment with a solely positive one. Works published by the Institute of Russian Civilization present the “holy Black Hundreds,” consisting of zealots and martyrs who gave their lives for the Orthodox faith during the revolution and the Civil War. It would be wrong to suggest, however, that the entire Orthodox clergy during the prerevolutionary period supported the extreme right. By the same token, one cannot say that the extreme right relied solely on Orthodox clergymen. The Black Hundreds did not shun cooperation with other religions. The Union of the Russian People in its “Founding Principles,” a kind of symbol of faith, stated that “non-Orthodox and\",\"PeriodicalId\":89267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian studies in history\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"124 - 136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian studies in history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2021.1916322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian studies in history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2021.1916322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“黑色百人”工会将自己定位为俄罗斯东正教的忠实拥护者和捍卫者。“黑色百人团”的意识形态基于尼古拉一世统治时期由乌瓦洛夫和波戈金制定的“东正教、专制、国家”三部分公式。极右翼理论家强调,俄罗斯人民与东正教有着牢不可破的纽带——“唯一真正的、使徒式的、家长式的教会”。君主派在旗子下进行游行,每个分支都有圣像,会议和集会以祈祷开始。“俄国人”代表大会伴随着祈祷仪式。极右分子与俄罗斯东正教的密切联系是如此明显,以至于苏联史学将东正教神职人员等同于黑色百人团。直到20世纪20年代末,出版了大量关于黑人百人团与教会之间关系的文章和小册子,这些文章和小册子都带有强烈的反教权基调。这些作品将东正教视为一股反动力量,而这正是“黑色百人”运动的主要支柱。矛盾的是,将极右翼与东正教神职人员完全等同的概念今天仍然存在,但它只是用一种完全积极的评价取代了一种消极的评价。俄罗斯文明研究所出版的作品展示了“神圣的黑色百人”,他们是在革命和内战期间为东正教信仰献出生命的狂热者和烈士。然而,如果认为整个东正教神职人员在前革命时期都支持极右翼,那就错了。同样的道理,我们也不能说极右翼只依靠东正教神职人员。黑色百人会并不回避与其他宗教的合作。俄罗斯人民联盟在其“建国原则”中,一种信仰的象征,声明“非东正教和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Black Hundreds and the Russian Orthodox Clergy
The Black Hundreds unions positioned themselves as committed champions and defenders of Russian Orthodoxy. The Black Hundreds’ ideology was based on the three-part formula of “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationhood,” formulated by S.S. Uvarov and M.P. Pogodin during the reign of Nicholas I. The ideologues of the extreme right emphasized that the Russian people were tied by indestructible bonds to Orthodoxy—“the sole true, apostolic, and paternalistic church.” The monarchists conducted their processions under gonfalons, every branch had icons, and meetings and rallies began with prayers. Congresses of “Russians” were accompanied by ceremonial prayer services. The extreme rightists’ close ties to the Russian Orthodox Church were so obvious that Soviet historiography equated the Orthodox clergy with the Black Hundreds. Up to the end of the 1920s, a good number of articles and pamphlets were published about the ties between the Black Hundreds and the Church that had a sharply anticlerical tone. These works treated the Orthodox Church as a reactionary force that was the main pillar of the Black Hundreds movement. Paradoxically, the concept of total identification of the extreme right with the Orthodox clergy still exists today, but it has merely replaced a negative assessment with a solely positive one. Works published by the Institute of Russian Civilization present the “holy Black Hundreds,” consisting of zealots and martyrs who gave their lives for the Orthodox faith during the revolution and the Civil War. It would be wrong to suggest, however, that the entire Orthodox clergy during the prerevolutionary period supported the extreme right. By the same token, one cannot say that the extreme right relied solely on Orthodox clergymen. The Black Hundreds did not shun cooperation with other religions. The Union of the Russian People in its “Founding Principles,” a kind of symbol of faith, stated that “non-Orthodox and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
War and Peace in “Asiatic Russia” The Russian Army in the Caucasus: A War of Private Actors Special Features and Mechanisms of Russia’s Trade and Economic Activities in Persia through Astrakhan in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century Conflict as a Resource: An Anatomy of the “Turkmen Unrest” in Khorezm, 1914–1916 Early Modern Trade in the Caspian Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1