气候变化中的集体诉讼

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2021.2002186
E. Schuster
{"title":"气候变化中的集体诉讼","authors":"E. Schuster","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2021.2002186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The need for decisive action on climate change is becoming increasingly urgent. The International Panel on Climate Change has warned that, on the current trajectory, global warming is likely to reach 1.5° Celsius above pre-industrial levels in the next ten to thirty years. This paper investigates the potential for a strategic climate change class action in South Africa by tracking two procedural devices: the class action and the public interest action. The example of Urgenda, a landmark judgement from the Netherlands, is used to show that while class actions may serve a limited purpose in a climate change litigation (particularly where there is a claim for damages) the public interest action will continue to be the more appropriate mechanism for strategic climate change litigation.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"102 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Class actions in a changing climate\",\"authors\":\"E. Schuster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02587203.2021.2002186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The need for decisive action on climate change is becoming increasingly urgent. The International Panel on Climate Change has warned that, on the current trajectory, global warming is likely to reach 1.5° Celsius above pre-industrial levels in the next ten to thirty years. This paper investigates the potential for a strategic climate change class action in South Africa by tracking two procedural devices: the class action and the public interest action. The example of Urgenda, a landmark judgement from the Netherlands, is used to show that while class actions may serve a limited purpose in a climate change litigation (particularly where there is a claim for damages) the public interest action will continue to be the more appropriate mechanism for strategic climate change litigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2021.2002186\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2021.2002186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对气候变化采取果断行动的必要性变得越来越迫切。国际气候变化专门委员会警告说,按照目前的轨迹,未来10到30年,全球变暖可能会比工业化前的水平高出1.5摄氏度。本文通过对集体诉讼和公共利益诉讼这两种诉讼手段的跟踪,探讨了南非气候变化集体诉讼的可能性。荷兰的一个具有里程碑意义的判决Urgenda的例子表明,虽然集体诉讼在气候变化诉讼中可能起到有限的作用(特别是在要求损害赔偿的情况下),但公共利益诉讼将继续是战略气候变化诉讼中更合适的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Class actions in a changing climate
Abstract The need for decisive action on climate change is becoming increasingly urgent. The International Panel on Climate Change has warned that, on the current trajectory, global warming is likely to reach 1.5° Celsius above pre-industrial levels in the next ten to thirty years. This paper investigates the potential for a strategic climate change class action in South Africa by tracking two procedural devices: the class action and the public interest action. The example of Urgenda, a landmark judgement from the Netherlands, is used to show that while class actions may serve a limited purpose in a climate change litigation (particularly where there is a claim for damages) the public interest action will continue to be the more appropriate mechanism for strategic climate change litigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1