支持穷人的税收监管工具的正当性

Oleksii Naidenko
{"title":"支持穷人的税收监管工具的正当性","authors":"Oleksii Naidenko","doi":"10.21511/ed.18(3).2019.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The system of taxation of personal income in Ukraine does not allow fully implementing the principle of social justice, which is regulated by the Tax Code of Ukraine. This is because in many cases, the taxpayers’ solvency is not taken into account when setting tax rates. The Ukrainian legislation does not regulate the list of poor people, and there is no clear compensatory mechanism of assistance to these social groups. As a result, the number of poor people is growing and, therefore, the social tension is increasing in Ukraine. The article focuses on the poor performance of Ukraine in various indices of socio-economic development, which results in the growth of poor people. There was no clear legislation to classify the poor in Ukraine. A list of poor people is offered. The main directions of poverty reduction in European countries are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the poor status of poverty reduction in Ukraine through tax policies, due to the poor implementation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy by the executive authorities. The instruments of tax regulation of low-income population in EU countries are considered, the main ones being tax rebate (tax credit), tax exemption, non-taxable minimum, and reduced tax rate. The list of instruments for tax regulation of low-income population in EU countries and Ukraine is summarized. The progressive scale of taxation of personal income is substantiated. The list of poor people is generalized. A non-taxable minimum income indicator is proposed based on the indicator used to determine the limit for applying the tax social benefit. Given the experience of EU countries, the introduction of separate instruments for tax regulation of lowincome groups in Ukraine is justified. Oleksii Naidenko (Ukraine) JUSTIFICATION OF TAX REGULATION TOOLS TO SUPPORT THE POOR poverty, tax exemptions, low-income groups, tax regulation instruments, tax-free minimum, personal income tax, tax rebate, social security tax, progressive tax rate","PeriodicalId":33449,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika rozvitku","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justification of tax regulation tools to support the poor\",\"authors\":\"Oleksii Naidenko\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/ed.18(3).2019.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The system of taxation of personal income in Ukraine does not allow fully implementing the principle of social justice, which is regulated by the Tax Code of Ukraine. This is because in many cases, the taxpayers’ solvency is not taken into account when setting tax rates. The Ukrainian legislation does not regulate the list of poor people, and there is no clear compensatory mechanism of assistance to these social groups. As a result, the number of poor people is growing and, therefore, the social tension is increasing in Ukraine. The article focuses on the poor performance of Ukraine in various indices of socio-economic development, which results in the growth of poor people. There was no clear legislation to classify the poor in Ukraine. A list of poor people is offered. The main directions of poverty reduction in European countries are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the poor status of poverty reduction in Ukraine through tax policies, due to the poor implementation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy by the executive authorities. The instruments of tax regulation of low-income population in EU countries are considered, the main ones being tax rebate (tax credit), tax exemption, non-taxable minimum, and reduced tax rate. The list of instruments for tax regulation of low-income population in EU countries and Ukraine is summarized. The progressive scale of taxation of personal income is substantiated. The list of poor people is generalized. A non-taxable minimum income indicator is proposed based on the indicator used to determine the limit for applying the tax social benefit. Given the experience of EU countries, the introduction of separate instruments for tax regulation of lowincome groups in Ukraine is justified. Oleksii Naidenko (Ukraine) JUSTIFICATION OF TAX REGULATION TOOLS TO SUPPORT THE POOR poverty, tax exemptions, low-income groups, tax regulation instruments, tax-free minimum, personal income tax, tax rebate, social security tax, progressive tax rate\",\"PeriodicalId\":33449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomika rozvitku\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomika rozvitku\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/ed.18(3).2019.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika rozvitku","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ed.18(3).2019.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

乌克兰的个人所得税制度不允许充分执行《乌克兰税法》规定的社会公正原则。这是因为在许多情况下,制定税率时没有考虑纳税人的偿付能力。乌克兰的立法没有规定穷人的名单,也没有明确的向这些社会群体提供援助的补偿机制。因此,贫困人口的数量正在增加,因此,乌克兰的社会紧张局势正在加剧。这篇文章的重点是乌克兰在各种社会经济发展指数中的糟糕表现,这导致了贫困人口的增长。乌克兰没有明确的立法对穷人进行分类。提供了一份穷人名单。分析了欧洲国家减贫的主要方向。提请注意乌克兰通过税收政策减贫情况不佳,原因是行政当局执行《减贫战略》不力。考虑了欧盟国家对低收入人口的税收监管工具,主要有退税(税收抵免)、免税、免税最低额和降低税率。概述了欧盟国家和乌克兰低收入人口税收监管工具清单。个人所得税的累进税率已得到证实。穷人的名单是广义的。根据用于确定税收社会福利适用限额的指标,提出了一个不征税的最低收入指标。鉴于欧盟国家的经验,引入单独的工具对乌克兰低收入群体进行税收监管是合理的。Oleksii Naidenko(乌克兰)支持贫困人口的税收监管工具的合理性、免税、低收入群体、税收监管工具、免税最低额、个人所得税、退税、社会保障税、累进税率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Justification of tax regulation tools to support the poor
The system of taxation of personal income in Ukraine does not allow fully implementing the principle of social justice, which is regulated by the Tax Code of Ukraine. This is because in many cases, the taxpayers’ solvency is not taken into account when setting tax rates. The Ukrainian legislation does not regulate the list of poor people, and there is no clear compensatory mechanism of assistance to these social groups. As a result, the number of poor people is growing and, therefore, the social tension is increasing in Ukraine. The article focuses on the poor performance of Ukraine in various indices of socio-economic development, which results in the growth of poor people. There was no clear legislation to classify the poor in Ukraine. A list of poor people is offered. The main directions of poverty reduction in European countries are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the poor status of poverty reduction in Ukraine through tax policies, due to the poor implementation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy by the executive authorities. The instruments of tax regulation of low-income population in EU countries are considered, the main ones being tax rebate (tax credit), tax exemption, non-taxable minimum, and reduced tax rate. The list of instruments for tax regulation of low-income population in EU countries and Ukraine is summarized. The progressive scale of taxation of personal income is substantiated. The list of poor people is generalized. A non-taxable minimum income indicator is proposed based on the indicator used to determine the limit for applying the tax social benefit. Given the experience of EU countries, the introduction of separate instruments for tax regulation of lowincome groups in Ukraine is justified. Oleksii Naidenko (Ukraine) JUSTIFICATION OF TAX REGULATION TOOLS TO SUPPORT THE POOR poverty, tax exemptions, low-income groups, tax regulation instruments, tax-free minimum, personal income tax, tax rebate, social security tax, progressive tax rate
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Determining priorities for Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction in the conditions of preparation for EU membership Scientific and methodological principles of organizational capital management and its assessment Risk factors determination of enterprise external and internal environment during project implementation Identifying patterns of interest in the topic of managing equity capital of the enterprise Use of creative marketing in the implementation of enterprise strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1