社论:我们需要知道以前的判例法何时被“推翻”!-呼吁提高欧盟税收的法律确定性

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2023019
Axel Cordewener
{"title":"社论:我们需要知道以前的判例法何时被“推翻”!-呼吁提高欧盟税收的法律确定性","authors":"Axel Cordewener","doi":"10.54648/ecta2023019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its recent judgment inW AG the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) fundamentally departed in substance from earlier case-law concerning the treatment of ‘final losses’ incurred by foreign permanent establishments. However, like in other tax cases before, the Court did not clarify that previous decisions (in particular, Lidl Belgium) are ‘overruled’ now. This causes unnecessary damage to legal certainty in the area of EU tax law, and the CJEU should reconsider this approach towards ‘overruling’ in future cases. Furthermore, situations of ‘overruling’ also deserve special attention within the framework of the current reform of the preliminary ruling system.\noverruling, legal certainty, direct taxation, final losses, Marks & Spencer doctrine, preliminary ruling, Court of Justice, General Court, Grand Chamber, CJEU Statute, CJEU Rules of Procedure","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: We Need to Know When Previous Case-Law Has Been ‘Overruled’! - A Plea for More Legal Certainty in EU Tax\",\"authors\":\"Axel Cordewener\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/ecta2023019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In its recent judgment inW AG the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) fundamentally departed in substance from earlier case-law concerning the treatment of ‘final losses’ incurred by foreign permanent establishments. However, like in other tax cases before, the Court did not clarify that previous decisions (in particular, Lidl Belgium) are ‘overruled’ now. This causes unnecessary damage to legal certainty in the area of EU tax law, and the CJEU should reconsider this approach towards ‘overruling’ in future cases. Furthermore, situations of ‘overruling’ also deserve special attention within the framework of the current reform of the preliminary ruling system.\\noverruling, legal certainty, direct taxation, final losses, Marks & Spencer doctrine, preliminary ruling, Court of Justice, General Court, Grand Chamber, CJEU Statute, CJEU Rules of Procedure\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2023019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2023019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲联盟法院(CJEU)在其最近对联邦法院的判决中,在实质上从根本上背离了早先关于处理外国常设机构所造成的“最后损失”的判例法。然而,就像以前的其他税务案件一样,法院没有澄清以前的决定(特别是Lidl Belgium)现在被“推翻”。这对欧盟税法领域的法律确定性造成了不必要的损害,欧洲法院应该在未来的案件中重新考虑这种“推翻”的方法。此外,在当前初审制度改革的框架内,“推翻”的情况也值得特别关注。否决、法律确定性、直税、最终损失、玛莎原则、初步裁决、法院、普通法院、大分庭、欧洲法院规约、欧洲法院程序规则
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Editorial: We Need to Know When Previous Case-Law Has Been ‘Overruled’! - A Plea for More Legal Certainty in EU Tax
In its recent judgment inW AG the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) fundamentally departed in substance from earlier case-law concerning the treatment of ‘final losses’ incurred by foreign permanent establishments. However, like in other tax cases before, the Court did not clarify that previous decisions (in particular, Lidl Belgium) are ‘overruled’ now. This causes unnecessary damage to legal certainty in the area of EU tax law, and the CJEU should reconsider this approach towards ‘overruling’ in future cases. Furthermore, situations of ‘overruling’ also deserve special attention within the framework of the current reform of the preliminary ruling system. overruling, legal certainty, direct taxation, final losses, Marks & Spencer doctrine, preliminary ruling, Court of Justice, General Court, Grand Chamber, CJEU Statute, CJEU Rules of Procedure
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1