模拟学习中压力对学生表现的影响:一项先导随机试验

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE ATS scholar Pub Date : 2023-08-31 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0042OC
Rocco Cavaleri, Alexia Withington, K Jane Chalmers, Felicity Blackstock
{"title":"模拟学习中压力对学生表现的影响:一项先导随机试验","authors":"Rocco Cavaleri, Alexia Withington, K Jane Chalmers, Felicity Blackstock","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0042OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based learning is an important educational medium that is being implemented increasingly for the purpose of improved patient care and safety. However, there is evidence to suggest that simulation-based education (SBE) may increase anxiety, as illustrated through self-reporting and physiological responses. Despite such data, no studies have investigated whether anxiety and stress can be manipulated through SBE scenario design and delivery to facilitate optimal learning conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study examined perceived anxiety and physiological stress experienced by entry-level physiotherapy students while learning a skill using SBE and the relationship between this anxiety and their subsequent skill performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Final-year physiotherapy students were randomly allocated to one of three SBE experiences: low, medium, or high stress. The experiences were designed to induce increasing levels of stress and anxiety. Performance of the learned skill (endotracheal airway suctioning) was measured after the SBE using a bespoke assessment form. Cortisol levels, heart rate, and perceived anxiety measurements (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and visual analog scale) were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants completed the trial. There were significant differences in perceived stress and physiological response between the groups. The low-stress group demonstrated significantly better performance of airway suctioning than the higher-stress groups (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Higher anxiety was correlated with poorer skill performance (<i>r</i> = -0.410).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students report SBE to be stressful, and scenarios themselves can influence the stress and anxiety experienced. Greater stress is associated with poor learning outcomes during SBE. Healthcare educators involved in SBE scenario design need to consider the stress levels experienced. Future research to determine optimal stress and embed measurement of stress in SBE experiences is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Stress on Student Performance during Simulation-based Learning: A Pilot Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rocco Cavaleri, Alexia Withington, K Jane Chalmers, Felicity Blackstock\",\"doi\":\"10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0042OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based learning is an important educational medium that is being implemented increasingly for the purpose of improved patient care and safety. However, there is evidence to suggest that simulation-based education (SBE) may increase anxiety, as illustrated through self-reporting and physiological responses. Despite such data, no studies have investigated whether anxiety and stress can be manipulated through SBE scenario design and delivery to facilitate optimal learning conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study examined perceived anxiety and physiological stress experienced by entry-level physiotherapy students while learning a skill using SBE and the relationship between this anxiety and their subsequent skill performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Final-year physiotherapy students were randomly allocated to one of three SBE experiences: low, medium, or high stress. The experiences were designed to induce increasing levels of stress and anxiety. Performance of the learned skill (endotracheal airway suctioning) was measured after the SBE using a bespoke assessment form. Cortisol levels, heart rate, and perceived anxiety measurements (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and visual analog scale) were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants completed the trial. There were significant differences in perceived stress and physiological response between the groups. The low-stress group demonstrated significantly better performance of airway suctioning than the higher-stress groups (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Higher anxiety was correlated with poorer skill performance (<i>r</i> = -0.410).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students report SBE to be stressful, and scenarios themselves can influence the stress and anxiety experienced. Greater stress is associated with poor learning outcomes during SBE. Healthcare educators involved in SBE scenario design need to consider the stress levels experienced. Future research to determine optimal stress and embed measurement of stress in SBE experiences is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATS scholar\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773496/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATS scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0042OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0042OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:模拟学习是一种重要的教育手段,为了改善患者护理和提高安全性,越来越多的人开始使用这种手段。然而,有证据表明,模拟教育(SBE)可能会增加焦虑,自我报告和生理反应就说明了这一点。尽管有这些数据,但还没有研究表明焦虑和压力是否可以通过 SBE 情景设计和提供来调节,以促进最佳的学习条件:本试验性研究考察了初级物理治疗专业学生在使用 SBE 学习技能时感受到的焦虑和生理压力,以及这种焦虑与他们随后的技能表现之间的关系:最后一年的理疗专业学生被随机分配到三种 SBE 体验中的一种:低、中、高压力。设计这些体验的目的是诱导学生产生越来越大的压力和焦虑。SBE结束后,使用定制的评估表测量所学技能(气管插管吸痰)的表现。此外,还收集了皮质醇水平、心率和感知焦虑测量值(状态-特质焦虑量表和视觉模拟量表):结果:27 名参与者完成了试验。各组在感知压力和生理反应方面存在明显差异。低压力组在气道吸引方面的表现明显优于高压力组(P = 0.02)。焦虑程度越高,技能表现越差(r = -0.410):结论:学生认为 SBE 会给他们带来压力,而情景本身会影响所经历的压力和焦虑。结论:学生认为 SBE 会给他们带来压力,而情景本身会影响他们的压力和焦虑,压力越大,SBE 的学习效果越差。参与SBE情景设计的医疗保健教育者需要考虑到所经历的压力水平。未来有必要开展研究,以确定最佳压力,并对 SBE 体验中的压力进行嵌入式测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Influence of Stress on Student Performance during Simulation-based Learning: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Background: Simulation-based learning is an important educational medium that is being implemented increasingly for the purpose of improved patient care and safety. However, there is evidence to suggest that simulation-based education (SBE) may increase anxiety, as illustrated through self-reporting and physiological responses. Despite such data, no studies have investigated whether anxiety and stress can be manipulated through SBE scenario design and delivery to facilitate optimal learning conditions.

Objective: This pilot study examined perceived anxiety and physiological stress experienced by entry-level physiotherapy students while learning a skill using SBE and the relationship between this anxiety and their subsequent skill performance.

Methods: Final-year physiotherapy students were randomly allocated to one of three SBE experiences: low, medium, or high stress. The experiences were designed to induce increasing levels of stress and anxiety. Performance of the learned skill (endotracheal airway suctioning) was measured after the SBE using a bespoke assessment form. Cortisol levels, heart rate, and perceived anxiety measurements (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and visual analog scale) were also collected.

Results: Twenty-seven participants completed the trial. There were significant differences in perceived stress and physiological response between the groups. The low-stress group demonstrated significantly better performance of airway suctioning than the higher-stress groups (P = 0.02). Higher anxiety was correlated with poorer skill performance (r = -0.410).

Conclusions: Students report SBE to be stressful, and scenarios themselves can influence the stress and anxiety experienced. Greater stress is associated with poor learning outcomes during SBE. Healthcare educators involved in SBE scenario design need to consider the stress levels experienced. Future research to determine optimal stress and embed measurement of stress in SBE experiences is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Competency in Communication Skills: Curriculum Is Just the Beginning. Nonsurgical Treatment for Symptomatic Pulmonary Aspergilloma. Reply to Han and Kher: Treatment of Simple Pulmonary Aspergilloma. Video Speaks a Thousand Words: A Novel Educational Tool in Airway Management. Reply to Boppana and Mirsaeidi: Nonsurgical Treatment for Symptomatic Pulmonary Aspergilloma. Reply to Patel and LaNou: The Missing Piece: The Intersection of Pharmacist Board Certification and Tobacco Use Disorder Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1