对孟加拉国罗兴亚难民的不驱回原则分析

Y. Gunawan, Abdullah Teguh Thamrin Rettob, Kevin Kalagita
{"title":"对孟加拉国罗兴亚难民的不驱回原则分析","authors":"Y. Gunawan, Abdullah Teguh Thamrin Rettob, Kevin Kalagita","doi":"10.32801/lamlaj.v5i1.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Crime against humanity is still happening in some parts of the world for several reasons, includes the conflict of interest, politics as well as religion. It makes the victims like the Rohingya ethnic have to flee for finding peace and a secure place to survive. Non-Refoulement Principle which stated in 1951 Refugee Convention is being an important principle as the tools to protect the refugee and stateless person. In the Rohingya case, Bangladesh has argued about the ‘security problem’ of Rohingya’s pose, and Bangladesh also stated it became an important reason in sending the Rohingya back. From March 1, 2019, Bangladesh Authority no longer accepts refugees from Rohingya. The research aims to know further on the implementation of Non-Refoulement principle. In addition, the research was made by using library research analysis as the method of research; whole data and information that contained on the research were collected through literature review by referring to books, journals, articles and websites. The research found that Bangladesh does not apply the Non-Refoulement principle and violates the Humanitarian Assistance principle. Even though ‘security issues’ have been raised as land to repatriate refugees by Bangladesh to Myanmar, it cannot be applied and impose Non-Refoulement obligations to Bangladesh as a matter of customary international law. Keywords: Non-Refoulement Principles; Refugees; Stateless; Humanitarian Assistance","PeriodicalId":31238,"journal":{"name":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Analysis of Non-Refoulement Principle towards Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Y. Gunawan, Abdullah Teguh Thamrin Rettob, Kevin Kalagita\",\"doi\":\"10.32801/lamlaj.v5i1.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Crime against humanity is still happening in some parts of the world for several reasons, includes the conflict of interest, politics as well as religion. It makes the victims like the Rohingya ethnic have to flee for finding peace and a secure place to survive. Non-Refoulement Principle which stated in 1951 Refugee Convention is being an important principle as the tools to protect the refugee and stateless person. In the Rohingya case, Bangladesh has argued about the ‘security problem’ of Rohingya’s pose, and Bangladesh also stated it became an important reason in sending the Rohingya back. From March 1, 2019, Bangladesh Authority no longer accepts refugees from Rohingya. The research aims to know further on the implementation of Non-Refoulement principle. In addition, the research was made by using library research analysis as the method of research; whole data and information that contained on the research were collected through literature review by referring to books, journals, articles and websites. The research found that Bangladesh does not apply the Non-Refoulement principle and violates the Humanitarian Assistance principle. Even though ‘security issues’ have been raised as land to repatriate refugees by Bangladesh to Myanmar, it cannot be applied and impose Non-Refoulement obligations to Bangladesh as a matter of customary international law. Keywords: Non-Refoulement Principles; Refugees; Stateless; Humanitarian Assistance\",\"PeriodicalId\":31238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"13-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v5i1.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v5i1.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:危害人类罪仍在世界一些地区发生,原因有几个,包括利益冲突、政治和宗教。这使得像罗兴亚人这样的受害者不得不逃离,寻找和平和安全的生存之地。1951年《难民公约》规定的不强迫原则是保护难民和无国籍人的一项重要原则。在罗兴亚人案中,孟加拉国就罗兴亚的“安全问题”进行了争论,孟加拉国还表示,这成为遣返罗兴亚人员的一个重要原因。从2019年3月1日起,孟加拉国当局不再接收来自罗兴亚的难民。本研究旨在进一步了解非强制执行原则的实施情况。此外,本研究以图书馆研究分析为研究方法;通过查阅书籍、期刊、文章和网站进行文献综述,收集了本研究的全部数据和信息。研究发现,孟加拉国不适用不驱逐原则,违反了人道主义援助原则。尽管孟加拉国提出了将难民遣返缅甸的“安全问题”,但根据习惯国际法,这一问题不能适用,也不能对孟加拉国施加不遣返义务。关键词:无污染原则;难民;无国籍;人道主义援助
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Analysis of Non-Refoulement Principle towards Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh
Abstract: Crime against humanity is still happening in some parts of the world for several reasons, includes the conflict of interest, politics as well as religion. It makes the victims like the Rohingya ethnic have to flee for finding peace and a secure place to survive. Non-Refoulement Principle which stated in 1951 Refugee Convention is being an important principle as the tools to protect the refugee and stateless person. In the Rohingya case, Bangladesh has argued about the ‘security problem’ of Rohingya’s pose, and Bangladesh also stated it became an important reason in sending the Rohingya back. From March 1, 2019, Bangladesh Authority no longer accepts refugees from Rohingya. The research aims to know further on the implementation of Non-Refoulement principle. In addition, the research was made by using library research analysis as the method of research; whole data and information that contained on the research were collected through literature review by referring to books, journals, articles and websites. The research found that Bangladesh does not apply the Non-Refoulement principle and violates the Humanitarian Assistance principle. Even though ‘security issues’ have been raised as land to repatriate refugees by Bangladesh to Myanmar, it cannot be applied and impose Non-Refoulement obligations to Bangladesh as a matter of customary international law. Keywords: Non-Refoulement Principles; Refugees; Stateless; Humanitarian Assistance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of the Crime of Burning Peatlands in Banjar Regency Company Loans in Procurement of Goods Services Government Corruption Perspectives Forced Marriage as an Unlawful Act in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis Legal Protection of Peer to Peer Lending Loans in Standard Agreements Based on Legal Assurance Theory Implementation of Sustainable Plantation Principles Through Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil in North Aceh Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1