Kristine D. Swain, Jessica L. Hagaman, Elizabeth M. Leader-Janssen
{"title":"教师报告IEP目标数据收集方法","authors":"Kristine D. Swain, Jessica L. Hagaman, Elizabeth M. Leader-Janssen","doi":"10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Utilizing effective data collection methods to track student progress on Individual Education Program (IEP) goals is essential to quality programming and meeting each student’s specific needs. This study surveyed special education teachers in four midwestern states to understand IEP data collection methods and assessment training. Results indicated that IEP data collection methods varied by state and teaching level (elementary, middle, and high school), with the most frequently reported methods as observation (elementary and middle levels) and grades (high school level). Teachers reported lack of time, resources, and training as barriers to data collection. Recommendations provide specific areas of focus for professional development, educator preparation programs, and mentoring based on the results of this research. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849.","PeriodicalId":46774,"journal":{"name":"Preventing School Failure","volume":"66 1","pages":"118 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher-reported IEP goal data collection methods\",\"authors\":\"Kristine D. Swain, Jessica L. Hagaman, Elizabeth M. Leader-Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Utilizing effective data collection methods to track student progress on Individual Education Program (IEP) goals is essential to quality programming and meeting each student’s specific needs. This study surveyed special education teachers in four midwestern states to understand IEP data collection methods and assessment training. Results indicated that IEP data collection methods varied by state and teaching level (elementary, middle, and high school), with the most frequently reported methods as observation (elementary and middle levels) and grades (high school level). Teachers reported lack of time, resources, and training as barriers to data collection. Recommendations provide specific areas of focus for professional development, educator preparation programs, and mentoring based on the results of this research. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing School Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Utilizing effective data collection methods to track student progress on Individual Education Program (IEP) goals is essential to quality programming and meeting each student’s specific needs. This study surveyed special education teachers in four midwestern states to understand IEP data collection methods and assessment training. Results indicated that IEP data collection methods varied by state and teaching level (elementary, middle, and high school), with the most frequently reported methods as observation (elementary and middle levels) and grades (high school level). Teachers reported lack of time, resources, and training as barriers to data collection. Recommendations provide specific areas of focus for professional development, educator preparation programs, and mentoring based on the results of this research. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849.
期刊介绍:
Preventing School Failure provides a forum in which to examine critically emerging and evidence-based practices that are both data driven and practical for children and youth in general and alternative education systems. Authors are afforded the opportunity to discuss and debate critical and sometimes controversial issues that affect the education of children and adolescents in various settings. Preventing School Failure is a peer-reviewed academic journal for administrators, educators, mental health workers, juvenile justice and corrections personnel, day and residential treatment personnel, staff-development specialists, teacher educators, and others. Our goal is to share authoritative and timely information with a wide-ranging audience dedicated to serving children and adolescents in general education, special education, and alternative education programs. We accept for review manuscripts that contain critical and integrated literature reviews, objective program evaluations, evidence-based strategies and procedures, program descriptions, and policy-related content. As appropriate, manuscripts should contain enough detail that readers are able to put useful or innovative strategies or procedures into practice.