权力越大,影响力越小:欧洲危机后媒体对财政政策的辩论中的欧盟参与者

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2022.2115485
P. de Wilde
{"title":"权力越大,影响力越小:欧洲危机后媒体对财政政策的辩论中的欧盟参与者","authors":"P. de Wilde","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2022.2115485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stronger European Union (EU) competencies come with greater media presence, according to existing cross-sectional comparisons. While presence comes with the power to influence public discourse, we know little about how it affects the overall tone of public discourse. This article investigates the effect of the empowerment of EU institutions on media presence and the tone of debate in the EU. It does this through an original claims analysis of newspaper articles in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Denmark, and Poland during the height of the Euro crisis (2011–2012), the Greek bailout crisis (2015), and the Italian budget crisis (2018). EU media presence indeed increases following empowerment. However, this does not result in a more pro-European debate, because pro-European national voices are crowded out. While this does not affect the desirability of austerity, it does harden Eurosceptic public discourse.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"45 1","pages":"239 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More power, less influence: European union actors in media debates on fiscal policy after the eurocrisis\",\"authors\":\"P. de Wilde\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07036337.2022.2115485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Stronger European Union (EU) competencies come with greater media presence, according to existing cross-sectional comparisons. While presence comes with the power to influence public discourse, we know little about how it affects the overall tone of public discourse. This article investigates the effect of the empowerment of EU institutions on media presence and the tone of debate in the EU. It does this through an original claims analysis of newspaper articles in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Denmark, and Poland during the height of the Euro crisis (2011–2012), the Greek bailout crisis (2015), and the Italian budget crisis (2018). EU media presence indeed increases following empowerment. However, this does not result in a more pro-European debate, because pro-European national voices are crowded out. While this does not affect the desirability of austerity, it does harden Eurosceptic public discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2115485\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2115485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要根据现有的横向比较,欧盟(EU)的竞争力越强,媒体的影响力就越大。虽然存在具有影响公共话语的力量,但我们对它如何影响公共话语整体基调知之甚少。本文调查了欧盟机构的授权对媒体存在和欧盟辩论基调的影响。它通过对德国、法国、意大利、西班牙、丹麦和波兰在欧元危机最严重时期(2011-2012年)、希腊救助危机(2015年)和意大利预算危机(2018年)的报纸文章进行原始索赔分析来做到这一点。授权后,欧盟媒体的影响力确实有所增加。然而,这并没有导致更亲欧洲的辩论,因为亲欧洲的国家声音被挤出了。虽然这不会影响紧缩政策的可取性,但它确实强化了疑欧派的公共话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More power, less influence: European union actors in media debates on fiscal policy after the eurocrisis
ABSTRACT Stronger European Union (EU) competencies come with greater media presence, according to existing cross-sectional comparisons. While presence comes with the power to influence public discourse, we know little about how it affects the overall tone of public discourse. This article investigates the effect of the empowerment of EU institutions on media presence and the tone of debate in the EU. It does this through an original claims analysis of newspaper articles in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Denmark, and Poland during the height of the Euro crisis (2011–2012), the Greek bailout crisis (2015), and the Italian budget crisis (2018). EU media presence indeed increases following empowerment. However, this does not result in a more pro-European debate, because pro-European national voices are crowded out. While this does not affect the desirability of austerity, it does harden Eurosceptic public discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
External shocks, policy spillovers, and veto players: (post)exceptionalist common agricultural policy and the case of the 2023-2027 reform The Roma and the double-movement of Social Europe Democracy and European Union: beyond the dichotomy The quiet politics of migration supranationalization – Commission entrepreneurship and the intra-Corporate Transferee Directive The COVID-19 pandemic and institutional change in the EU’s financial assistance regime: the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1