利用间接信息检验线性假设

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique Pub Date : 2023-02-11 DOI:10.1002/cjs.11760
Andrew McCormack, Peter D. Hoff
{"title":"利用间接信息检验线性假设","authors":"Andrew McCormack,&nbsp;Peter D. Hoff","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In multigroup data settings with small within-group sample sizes, standard <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-tests of group-specific linear hypotheses can have low power, particularly if the within-group sample sizes are not large relative to the number of explanatory variables. To remedy this situation, in this article we derive alternative test statistics based on information sharing across groups. Each group-specific test has potentially much larger power than the standard <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-test, while still exactly maintaining a target type I error rate if the null hypothesis for the group is true. The proposed test for a given group uses a statistic that has optimal marginal power under a prior distribution derived from the data of the other groups. This statistic approaches the usual <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-statistic as the prior distribution becomes more diffuse, but approaches a limiting “cone” test statistic as the prior distribution becomes extremely concentrated. We compare the power and <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>P</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ P $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-values of the cone test to that of the <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-test in some high-dimensional asymptotic scenarios. An analysis of educational outcome data is provided, demonstrating empirically that the proposed test is more powerful than the <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-test.</p>","PeriodicalId":55281,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tests of linear hypotheses using indirect information\",\"authors\":\"Andrew McCormack,&nbsp;Peter D. Hoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjs.11760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In multigroup data settings with small within-group sample sizes, standard <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-tests of group-specific linear hypotheses can have low power, particularly if the within-group sample sizes are not large relative to the number of explanatory variables. To remedy this situation, in this article we derive alternative test statistics based on information sharing across groups. Each group-specific test has potentially much larger power than the standard <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-test, while still exactly maintaining a target type I error rate if the null hypothesis for the group is true. The proposed test for a given group uses a statistic that has optimal marginal power under a prior distribution derived from the data of the other groups. This statistic approaches the usual <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-statistic as the prior distribution becomes more diffuse, but approaches a limiting “cone” test statistic as the prior distribution becomes extremely concentrated. We compare the power and <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ P $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-values of the cone test to that of the <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-test in some high-dimensional asymptotic scenarios. An analysis of educational outcome data is provided, demonstrating empirically that the proposed test is more powerful than the <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ F $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjs.11760\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjs.11760","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在组内样本量较小的多组数据设置中,组内特定线性假设的标准F $$ F $$检验可能具有较低的功效,特别是当组内样本量相对于解释变量的数量并不大时。为了纠正这种情况,在本文中,我们基于组间的信息共享导出了可选的测试统计信息。如果组的零假设为真,则每个组特定的测试可能比标准F $$ F $$ - test的功率大得多,同时仍然完全保持目标I型错误率。对于给定的组,建议的测试使用在从其他组的数据导出的先验分布下具有最优边际功率的统计量。当先验分布变得更加分散时,该统计量接近通常的F $$ F $$统计量,但当先验分布变得极其集中时,该统计量接近极限“锥”检验统计量。在一些高维渐近情形下,我们比较了锥检验与F $$ F $$检验的幂和P $$ P $$ -值。对教育成果数据的分析提供,实证证明,提出的测试比F $$ F $$‐测试更强大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tests of linear hypotheses using indirect information

In multigroup data settings with small within-group sample sizes, standard F $$ F $$ -tests of group-specific linear hypotheses can have low power, particularly if the within-group sample sizes are not large relative to the number of explanatory variables. To remedy this situation, in this article we derive alternative test statistics based on information sharing across groups. Each group-specific test has potentially much larger power than the standard F $$ F $$ -test, while still exactly maintaining a target type I error rate if the null hypothesis for the group is true. The proposed test for a given group uses a statistic that has optimal marginal power under a prior distribution derived from the data of the other groups. This statistic approaches the usual F $$ F $$ -statistic as the prior distribution becomes more diffuse, but approaches a limiting “cone” test statistic as the prior distribution becomes extremely concentrated. We compare the power and P $$ P $$ -values of the cone test to that of the F $$ F $$ -test in some high-dimensional asymptotic scenarios. An analysis of educational outcome data is provided, demonstrating empirically that the proposed test is more powerful than the F $$ F $$ -test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Statistics is the official journal of the Statistical Society of Canada. It has a reputation internationally as an excellent journal. The editorial board is comprised of statistical scientists with applied, computational, methodological, theoretical and probabilistic interests. Their role is to ensure that the journal continues to provide an international forum for the discipline of Statistics. The journal seeks papers making broad points of interest to many readers, whereas papers making important points of more specific interest are better placed in more specialized journals. The levels of innovation and impact are key in the evaluation of submitted manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information True and false discoveries with independent and sequential e-values Multiple change-point detection for regression curves Robust estimation of loss-based measures of model performance under covariate shift An SIR-based Bayesian framework for COVID-19 infection estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1