来自其他地方

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Review Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1177/01417789221147548
J. Roy, Pavithra Prasad, R. Putcha, Omar Kasmani
{"title":"来自其他地方","authors":"J. Roy, Pavithra Prasad, R. Putcha, Omar Kasmani","doi":"10.1177/01417789221147548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a conversation that began elsewhere. Although primed and conditioned in typical spaces where scholarly discourse emerges—conferences, classrooms, coffee shops, living rooms—and in typical temporalities—20-minute Q&As following panels, early-morning or late-night wrangling of ideas onto a page, in the duration of a lecture—the affect of a less conventional hermeneutic seemed to permeate neatly drawn lines around carefully complicated scholarship on queer South Asia. Anjali Arondekar and Geeta Patel (2016) articulate this discursive move in ‘Area impossible: notes toward an introduction’, pushing queer studies past the ‘homing devices’ of geopolitical and identitarian boundaries that regulate areas studies, especially of the Global South. To move away from the necessity of location, of grounding or of cohesive intersectional identity sets global queer studies into a different orbit—one that prefers to decentre geography from the locus of queer relationality. For South Asia, this could mean a variety of things, but what we hope to do in this themed issue is to inhabit a speculative realm of possibility where the subcontinent ceases to declare itself. Rather, the elsewheres we seek reframe queerness as the organising logic of area (impossible) studies.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"133 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Elsewhere\",\"authors\":\"J. Roy, Pavithra Prasad, R. Putcha, Omar Kasmani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01417789221147548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a conversation that began elsewhere. Although primed and conditioned in typical spaces where scholarly discourse emerges—conferences, classrooms, coffee shops, living rooms—and in typical temporalities—20-minute Q&As following panels, early-morning or late-night wrangling of ideas onto a page, in the duration of a lecture—the affect of a less conventional hermeneutic seemed to permeate neatly drawn lines around carefully complicated scholarship on queer South Asia. Anjali Arondekar and Geeta Patel (2016) articulate this discursive move in ‘Area impossible: notes toward an introduction’, pushing queer studies past the ‘homing devices’ of geopolitical and identitarian boundaries that regulate areas studies, especially of the Global South. To move away from the necessity of location, of grounding or of cohesive intersectional identity sets global queer studies into a different orbit—one that prefers to decentre geography from the locus of queer relationality. For South Asia, this could mean a variety of things, but what we hope to do in this themed issue is to inhabit a speculative realm of possibility where the subcontinent ceases to declare itself. Rather, the elsewheres we seek reframe queerness as the organising logic of area (impossible) studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Review\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789221147548\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789221147548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一场从别处开始的对话。尽管在学术话语出现的典型空间——会议、教室、咖啡店、客厅——以及在典型的时间里——已经做好了准备和条件,但在小组讨论后的20分钟问答、清晨或深夜在一页纸上争论想法,在一次演讲中,一种不太传统的解释学的影响似乎渗透到了关于酷儿南亚的精心复杂的学术中。Anjali Arondekar和Geeta Patel(2016)在《不可能的领域:引入笔记》中阐述了这一论述性举措,将酷儿研究推过了地缘政治和身份主义边界的“归巢装置”,这些边界规范了区域研究,尤其是全球南部的区域研究。为了摆脱位置、基础或连贯的交叉身份的必要性,全球酷儿研究进入了一个不同的轨道——一个更倾向于将地理从酷儿关系的中心分离出来的轨道。对南亚来说,这可能意味着各种各样的事情,但我们希望在这个主题问题上做的是居住在一个猜测的可能性领域,在那里次大陆不再宣布自己。相反,我们寻求的其他方法将怪异重新定义为区域(不可能)研究的组织逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Elsewhere
This is a conversation that began elsewhere. Although primed and conditioned in typical spaces where scholarly discourse emerges—conferences, classrooms, coffee shops, living rooms—and in typical temporalities—20-minute Q&As following panels, early-morning or late-night wrangling of ideas onto a page, in the duration of a lecture—the affect of a less conventional hermeneutic seemed to permeate neatly drawn lines around carefully complicated scholarship on queer South Asia. Anjali Arondekar and Geeta Patel (2016) articulate this discursive move in ‘Area impossible: notes toward an introduction’, pushing queer studies past the ‘homing devices’ of geopolitical and identitarian boundaries that regulate areas studies, especially of the Global South. To move away from the necessity of location, of grounding or of cohesive intersectional identity sets global queer studies into a different orbit—one that prefers to decentre geography from the locus of queer relationality. For South Asia, this could mean a variety of things, but what we hope to do in this themed issue is to inhabit a speculative realm of possibility where the subcontinent ceases to declare itself. Rather, the elsewheres we seek reframe queerness as the organising logic of area (impossible) studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Review
Feminist Review WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Feminist Review is a peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal setting new agendas for the analysis of the social world. Currently based in London with an international scope, FR invites critical reflection on the relationship between materiality and representation, theory and practice, subjectivity and communities, contemporary and historical formations. The FR Collective is committed to exploring gender in its multiple forms and interrelationships. As well as academic articles we publish experimental pieces, visual and textual media and political interventions, including, for example, interviews, short stories, poems and photographic essays.
期刊最新文献
online public shaming as a feminist practice for social change, a double-edged sword for fighting gender violence: the case of the ‘feminist funa’ in Chile ‘we are not like them’: reinventing modernity within tradition in the debates on female khatna / female genital cutting in India un/desirable encounters at the intersections of caste, class and religion Summer, black solidarity through mail-based participatory visual research: exploring queer and feminist futures through an art, activism and archiving project with 2SLGBTQ+ youth amidst COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1