M. Rodda, N. Simonsson, E. Ercole, G. Khew, M. Niissalo, S. Rahayu, Tatyana Livshultz
{"title":"Hoya群(夹竹桃科、麻科)的系统发育研究:Anatopathus和Oreosport的位置","authors":"M. Rodda, N. Simonsson, E. Ercole, G. Khew, M. Niissalo, S. Rahayu, Tatyana Livshultz","doi":"10.3372/wi.50.50112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent molecular phylogenetic studies have shown that Hoya is paraphyletic without Absolmsia, Clemensiella, Madangia, and Micholitzia. These genera have been placed in synonymy with Hoya, but the monophyly of Hoya sensu lato relative to other genera of the broader Hoya group (Dischidia, Anatropanthus and Oreosparte, the latter two never included in a molecular phylogenetic analysis) remained unclear. Furthermore, no analysis has included both a significant sample of the Hoya group and outgroup genera of Marsdenieae to test the monophyly of the Hoya group and its position within the tribe. To address these gaps, we assembled two data sets: (1) the chloroplast trnT-trnL-trnF locus from 110 species and (2) three chloroplast loci (trnT-trnL-trnF, atpB-psbA spacer and matK) and two nuclear loci (nrDNA ITS and ETS) from 54 species. The Hoya group is monophyletic and nested in an Asian/Australian clade of Marsdenia s.l. The genus Hoya is paraphyletic unless Anatropanthus, Dischidia and Oreosparte are included. However, current evidence is not sufficient to synonymize Dischidia and Oreosparte with Hoya. Support for synonymy of Anatropanthus with Hoya is strong and the new name H. insularis is proposed. A clade of three new species with Oreosparte-like morphology is sister to the rest of the Hoya group and is described as the new genus Papuahoya.Citation: Rodda M., Simonsson N., Ercole E., Khew G., Niissalo M., Rahayu S. & Livshultz T. 2020: Phylogenetic studies in the Hoya group (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae): the position of Anatropanthus and Oreosparte. – Willdenowia 50: 119–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50112Version of record first published online on 27 March 2020 ahead of inclusion in April 2020 issue.","PeriodicalId":48969,"journal":{"name":"Willdenowia","volume":"50 1","pages":"119-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenetic studies in the Hoya group (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae): the position of Anatropanthus and Oreosparte\",\"authors\":\"M. Rodda, N. Simonsson, E. Ercole, G. Khew, M. Niissalo, S. Rahayu, Tatyana Livshultz\",\"doi\":\"10.3372/wi.50.50112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent molecular phylogenetic studies have shown that Hoya is paraphyletic without Absolmsia, Clemensiella, Madangia, and Micholitzia. These genera have been placed in synonymy with Hoya, but the monophyly of Hoya sensu lato relative to other genera of the broader Hoya group (Dischidia, Anatropanthus and Oreosparte, the latter two never included in a molecular phylogenetic analysis) remained unclear. Furthermore, no analysis has included both a significant sample of the Hoya group and outgroup genera of Marsdenieae to test the monophyly of the Hoya group and its position within the tribe. To address these gaps, we assembled two data sets: (1) the chloroplast trnT-trnL-trnF locus from 110 species and (2) three chloroplast loci (trnT-trnL-trnF, atpB-psbA spacer and matK) and two nuclear loci (nrDNA ITS and ETS) from 54 species. The Hoya group is monophyletic and nested in an Asian/Australian clade of Marsdenia s.l. The genus Hoya is paraphyletic unless Anatropanthus, Dischidia and Oreosparte are included. However, current evidence is not sufficient to synonymize Dischidia and Oreosparte with Hoya. Support for synonymy of Anatropanthus with Hoya is strong and the new name H. insularis is proposed. A clade of three new species with Oreosparte-like morphology is sister to the rest of the Hoya group and is described as the new genus Papuahoya.Citation: Rodda M., Simonsson N., Ercole E., Khew G., Niissalo M., Rahayu S. & Livshultz T. 2020: Phylogenetic studies in the Hoya group (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae): the position of Anatropanthus and Oreosparte. – Willdenowia 50: 119–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50112Version of record first published online on 27 March 2020 ahead of inclusion in April 2020 issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Willdenowia\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"119-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Willdenowia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Willdenowia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
最近的分子系统发育研究表明,Hoya是一种没有Absolmsia, Clemensiella, Madangia和micholitia的副葡萄球菌。这些属被认为与霍亚属同义,但霍亚属与霍亚属其他属(Dischidia, Anatropanthus和Oreosparte,后两者从未被纳入分子系统发育分析)的单系关系尚不清楚。此外,没有分析包括霍亚族和马氏外群属的重要样本来测试霍亚族的单系性及其在部落中的地位。为了解决这些空白,我们收集了两个数据集:(1)来自110个物种的叶绿体trnT-trnL-trnF位点;(2)来自54个物种的三个叶绿体位点(trnT-trnL-trnF、atpB-psbA间隔和matK)和两个核位点(nrDNA ITS和ETS)。Hoya属是单系的,巢居于Marsdenia s.l的亚洲/澳大利亚分支中。Hoya属是副系的,除非包括Anatropanthus、Dischidia和Oreosparte。然而,目前的证据不足以将Dischidia和Oreosparte与Hoya同义。Anatropanthus与Hoya同义的说法得到了强有力的支持,并提出了新名称H. insularis。具有Oreosparte-like形态学的三个新种的分支是其他Hoya组的姐妹,被描述为新属Papuahoya。引用本文:Rodda M., Simonsson N., Ercole E., Khew G., Niissalo M., Rahayu S. & Livshultz T. 2020: Hoya类群(Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae)的系统发育研究:Anatropanthus和Oreosparte的位置。-野生动物学报50:119-138。doi: https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50112Version of record于2020年3月27日首次在线发表,并将于2020年4月被收录。
Phylogenetic studies in the Hoya group (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae): the position of Anatropanthus and Oreosparte
Recent molecular phylogenetic studies have shown that Hoya is paraphyletic without Absolmsia, Clemensiella, Madangia, and Micholitzia. These genera have been placed in synonymy with Hoya, but the monophyly of Hoya sensu lato relative to other genera of the broader Hoya group (Dischidia, Anatropanthus and Oreosparte, the latter two never included in a molecular phylogenetic analysis) remained unclear. Furthermore, no analysis has included both a significant sample of the Hoya group and outgroup genera of Marsdenieae to test the monophyly of the Hoya group and its position within the tribe. To address these gaps, we assembled two data sets: (1) the chloroplast trnT-trnL-trnF locus from 110 species and (2) three chloroplast loci (trnT-trnL-trnF, atpB-psbA spacer and matK) and two nuclear loci (nrDNA ITS and ETS) from 54 species. The Hoya group is monophyletic and nested in an Asian/Australian clade of Marsdenia s.l. The genus Hoya is paraphyletic unless Anatropanthus, Dischidia and Oreosparte are included. However, current evidence is not sufficient to synonymize Dischidia and Oreosparte with Hoya. Support for synonymy of Anatropanthus with Hoya is strong and the new name H. insularis is proposed. A clade of three new species with Oreosparte-like morphology is sister to the rest of the Hoya group and is described as the new genus Papuahoya.Citation: Rodda M., Simonsson N., Ercole E., Khew G., Niissalo M., Rahayu S. & Livshultz T. 2020: Phylogenetic studies in the Hoya group (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae): the position of Anatropanthus and Oreosparte. – Willdenowia 50: 119–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50112Version of record first published online on 27 March 2020 ahead of inclusion in April 2020 issue.
期刊介绍:
Willdenowia is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing original research articles in English from the entire fields of plant, algal and fungal systematics, covering the evolution, taxonomy and nomenclature of these organisms as well as related fields such as floristics and plant geography. Articles on phylogeny and molecular systematics are especially welcome, as are review articles. Descriptions of new taxa may be considered, but only if supported by robust evidence. Narrowly regional studies of widespread taxa, routine typifications, checklists and new floristic records are generally not considered (excluding contributions to the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae). Authors are encouraged to deposit duplicates of their material, especially nomenclatural types, in the Berlin herbarium (B).