H. Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Mehran Azami, M. Zad, A. Hashiani
{"title":"氯胺酮、利多卡因、对乙酰氨基酚和右美托咪定联合吗啡患者自控镇痛治疗胫骨骨折术后鸦片成瘾患者的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验","authors":"H. Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Mehran Azami, M. Zad, A. Hashiani","doi":"10.4103/2221-6189.357456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effect of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group, the lidocaine group, the acetaminophen group, and the dexmedetomidine group. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, and arterial SaO2, alongside visual analog scale pain scores, sedation assessed by Ramsay score, nausea and vomiting, and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups. Results: This study included 140 patients, aged 37 (32, 41) years, with 92 males and 48 females, and each group had 35 patients. Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery, decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery, and more satisfactory sedation (P<0.05). Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores, or nausea and vomiting among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine, lidocaine, and acetaminophen for pain control, but the final choice hinges on the patients’ physical condition and the anesthesiologist′s preference. Clinical registarion: It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.","PeriodicalId":45984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Disease","volume":"11 1","pages":"181 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia in treating opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"H. Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Mehran Azami, M. Zad, A. Hashiani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2221-6189.357456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the effect of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group, the lidocaine group, the acetaminophen group, and the dexmedetomidine group. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, and arterial SaO2, alongside visual analog scale pain scores, sedation assessed by Ramsay score, nausea and vomiting, and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups. Results: This study included 140 patients, aged 37 (32, 41) years, with 92 males and 48 females, and each group had 35 patients. Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery, decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery, and more satisfactory sedation (P<0.05). Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores, or nausea and vomiting among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine, lidocaine, and acetaminophen for pain control, but the final choice hinges on the patients’ physical condition and the anesthesiologist′s preference. Clinical registarion: It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.357456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.357456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较氯胺酮、利多卡因、对乙酰氨基酚、右美托咪定联合吗啡对胫骨骨折术后鸦片依赖者自控镇痛的效果。方法:双盲临床试验纳入接受胫骨骨折手术的阿片成瘾患者。招募患者并随机分为氯胺酮组、利多卡因组、对乙酰氨基酚组和右美托咪定组。记录四组患者的血流动力学参数,如心率(HR)、平均动脉压、动脉SaO2、视觉模拟疼痛评分、拉姆齐评分(Ramsay score)评定的镇静程度、恶心呕吐和阿片类药物使用情况。结果:本研究纳入140例患者,年龄37(32,41)岁,其中男性92例,女性48例,每组35例。右美托咪定镇静组患者术后1 ~ 24 h血压最低,术后12、24 h HR降低,镇静效果更满意(P0.05)。结论:右美托咪定在镇痛作用上优于氯胺酮、利多卡因和对乙酰氨基酚,但最终的选择取决于患者的身体状况和麻醉医师的偏好。临床注册:在伊朗注册中心临床试验注册,注册代码为IRCT20141209020258N146。
Comparative efficacy of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia in treating opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Objective: To compare the effect of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group, the lidocaine group, the acetaminophen group, and the dexmedetomidine group. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, and arterial SaO2, alongside visual analog scale pain scores, sedation assessed by Ramsay score, nausea and vomiting, and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups. Results: This study included 140 patients, aged 37 (32, 41) years, with 92 males and 48 females, and each group had 35 patients. Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery, decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery, and more satisfactory sedation (P<0.05). Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores, or nausea and vomiting among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine, lidocaine, and acetaminophen for pain control, but the final choice hinges on the patients’ physical condition and the anesthesiologist′s preference. Clinical registarion: It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.
期刊介绍:
The articles published mainly deal with pre-hospital and hospital emergency medicine, cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation, critical cardiovascular disease, sepsis, severe infection, multiple organ failure, acute and critical diseases in different medical fields, sudden cardiac arrest, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), critical care medicine, disaster rescue medicine (earthquakes, fires, floods, mine disaster, air crash, et al.), acute trauma, acute toxicology, acute heart disease, and related topics. JAD sets up columns for special subjects in each issue.