氯胺酮、利多卡因、对乙酰氨基酚和右美托咪定联合吗啡患者自控镇痛治疗胫骨骨折术后鸦片成瘾患者的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验

IF 0.4 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Acute Disease Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.4103/2221-6189.357456
H. Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Mehran Azami, M. Zad, A. Hashiani
{"title":"氯胺酮、利多卡因、对乙酰氨基酚和右美托咪定联合吗啡患者自控镇痛治疗胫骨骨折术后鸦片成瘾患者的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验","authors":"H. Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Mehran Azami, M. Zad, A. Hashiani","doi":"10.4103/2221-6189.357456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effect of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group, the lidocaine group, the acetaminophen group, and the dexmedetomidine group. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, and arterial SaO2, alongside visual analog scale pain scores, sedation assessed by Ramsay score, nausea and vomiting, and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups. Results: This study included 140 patients, aged 37 (32, 41) years, with 92 males and 48 females, and each group had 35 patients. Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery, decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery, and more satisfactory sedation (P<0.05). Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores, or nausea and vomiting among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine, lidocaine, and acetaminophen for pain control, but the final choice hinges on the patients’ physical condition and the anesthesiologist′s preference. Clinical registarion: It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.","PeriodicalId":45984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Disease","volume":"11 1","pages":"181 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia in treating opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"H. Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Mehran Azami, M. Zad, A. Hashiani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2221-6189.357456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the effect of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group, the lidocaine group, the acetaminophen group, and the dexmedetomidine group. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, and arterial SaO2, alongside visual analog scale pain scores, sedation assessed by Ramsay score, nausea and vomiting, and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups. Results: This study included 140 patients, aged 37 (32, 41) years, with 92 males and 48 females, and each group had 35 patients. Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery, decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery, and more satisfactory sedation (P<0.05). Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores, or nausea and vomiting among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine, lidocaine, and acetaminophen for pain control, but the final choice hinges on the patients’ physical condition and the anesthesiologist′s preference. Clinical registarion: It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.357456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.357456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较氯胺酮、利多卡因、对乙酰氨基酚、右美托咪定联合吗啡对胫骨骨折术后鸦片依赖者自控镇痛的效果。方法:双盲临床试验纳入接受胫骨骨折手术的阿片成瘾患者。招募患者并随机分为氯胺酮组、利多卡因组、对乙酰氨基酚组和右美托咪定组。记录四组患者的血流动力学参数,如心率(HR)、平均动脉压、动脉SaO2、视觉模拟疼痛评分、拉姆齐评分(Ramsay score)评定的镇静程度、恶心呕吐和阿片类药物使用情况。结果:本研究纳入140例患者,年龄37(32,41)岁,其中男性92例,女性48例,每组35例。右美托咪定镇静组患者术后1 ~ 24 h血压最低,术后12、24 h HR降低,镇静效果更满意(P0.05)。结论:右美托咪定在镇痛作用上优于氯胺酮、利多卡因和对乙酰氨基酚,但最终的选择取决于患者的身体状况和麻醉医师的偏好。临床注册:在伊朗注册中心临床试验注册,注册代码为IRCT20141209020258N146。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative efficacy of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia in treating opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Objective: To compare the effect of ketamine, lidocaine, acetaminophen, and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group, the lidocaine group, the acetaminophen group, and the dexmedetomidine group. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, and arterial SaO2, alongside visual analog scale pain scores, sedation assessed by Ramsay score, nausea and vomiting, and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups. Results: This study included 140 patients, aged 37 (32, 41) years, with 92 males and 48 females, and each group had 35 patients. Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery, decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery, and more satisfactory sedation (P<0.05). Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores, or nausea and vomiting among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine, lidocaine, and acetaminophen for pain control, but the final choice hinges on the patients’ physical condition and the anesthesiologist′s preference. Clinical registarion: It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acute Disease
Journal of Acute Disease CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
652
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The articles published mainly deal with pre-hospital and hospital emergency medicine, cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation, critical cardiovascular disease, sepsis, severe infection, multiple organ failure, acute and critical diseases in different medical fields, sudden cardiac arrest, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), critical care medicine, disaster rescue medicine (earthquakes, fires, floods, mine disaster, air crash, et al.), acute trauma, acute toxicology, acute heart disease, and related topics. JAD sets up columns for special subjects in each issue.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for development of pneumothorax in patients with COVID-19 at a government health facility in North India: An exploratory case-control study Predictors of hemorrhagic manifestations in dengue: A prospective observational study from the Hadoti region of Rajasthan COVID-19 mortality trends before and after the national vaccination program in Iran: A joinpoint regression analysis Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection: A case series A public health perspective on dengue in Bangladesh in the twenty-first century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1