排斥性公民身份:公众惩罚和对投票限制的支持

IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Justice Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1080/07418825.2022.2111324
Cecilia Chouhy, Peter S. Lehmann, Alexa J. Singer
{"title":"排斥性公民身份:公众惩罚和对投票限制的支持","authors":"Cecilia Chouhy, Peter S. Lehmann, Alexa J. Singer","doi":"10.1080/07418825.2022.2111324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Much scholarship has discussed how the expansion of the carceral state in the U.S. has consequences for other facets of the democracy. Specifically, felony disenfranchisement laws create a class of “carceral citizens” comprised disproportionately of racially minoritized individuals, and voter ID laws likewise closely mirror racialized segregation efforts that parallel the effects of justice system policies. Despite these clear theoretical linkages, little research has examined whether the anti-welfarism, anti-immigrant attitudes, and symbolic racism which fuel public punitiveness similarly increase support for voting restrictions. Further, it is unknown whether punitiveness itself intervenes in these relationships. Analyses of data from the 2020 American National Election Survey (N = 7,453) reveal considerable overlap between the sources of both punitiveness and voting restriction policies, and punitiveness sets an indirect path through which these social sensibilities influence support for voting restrictions. Further, party-specific analyses reveal that these associations generally are stronger for Democrats than Republicans.","PeriodicalId":48233,"journal":{"name":"Justice Quarterly","volume":"40 1","pages":"506 - 533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exclusionary Citizenship: Public Punitiveness and Support for Voting Restrictions\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Chouhy, Peter S. Lehmann, Alexa J. Singer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07418825.2022.2111324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Much scholarship has discussed how the expansion of the carceral state in the U.S. has consequences for other facets of the democracy. Specifically, felony disenfranchisement laws create a class of “carceral citizens” comprised disproportionately of racially minoritized individuals, and voter ID laws likewise closely mirror racialized segregation efforts that parallel the effects of justice system policies. Despite these clear theoretical linkages, little research has examined whether the anti-welfarism, anti-immigrant attitudes, and symbolic racism which fuel public punitiveness similarly increase support for voting restrictions. Further, it is unknown whether punitiveness itself intervenes in these relationships. Analyses of data from the 2020 American National Election Survey (N = 7,453) reveal considerable overlap between the sources of both punitiveness and voting restriction policies, and punitiveness sets an indirect path through which these social sensibilities influence support for voting restrictions. Further, party-specific analyses reveal that these associations generally are stronger for Democrats than Republicans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justice Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"506 - 533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justice Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2111324\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2111324","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多学术研究都讨论了美国联邦政府的扩张如何对民主的其他方面产生影响。具体来说,剥夺重罪公民权的法律创造了一个由种族少数群体不成比例组成的“监禁公民”阶层,选民身份法同样密切反映了与司法系统政策的影响相平行的种族隔离努力。尽管有这些明确的理论联系,但很少有研究调查反福利主义、反移民态度和象征性种族主义是否同样增加了对投票限制的支持,这些态度助长了公众的惩罚。此外,还不清楚惩罚本身是否会干预这些关系。对2020年美国全国选举调查(N = 7,453)数据的分析显示,惩罚性和投票限制政策的来源之间存在相当大的重叠,惩罚性设置了一条间接途径,通过这条途径,这些社会敏感性影响了对投票限制的支持。此外,针对特定党派的分析表明,这些联系通常对民主党人比对共和党人更强烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exclusionary Citizenship: Public Punitiveness and Support for Voting Restrictions
Abstract Much scholarship has discussed how the expansion of the carceral state in the U.S. has consequences for other facets of the democracy. Specifically, felony disenfranchisement laws create a class of “carceral citizens” comprised disproportionately of racially minoritized individuals, and voter ID laws likewise closely mirror racialized segregation efforts that parallel the effects of justice system policies. Despite these clear theoretical linkages, little research has examined whether the anti-welfarism, anti-immigrant attitudes, and symbolic racism which fuel public punitiveness similarly increase support for voting restrictions. Further, it is unknown whether punitiveness itself intervenes in these relationships. Analyses of data from the 2020 American National Election Survey (N = 7,453) reveal considerable overlap between the sources of both punitiveness and voting restriction policies, and punitiveness sets an indirect path through which these social sensibilities influence support for voting restrictions. Further, party-specific analyses reveal that these associations generally are stronger for Democrats than Republicans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Justice Quarterly
Justice Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Justice Quarterly (JQ) is an official publication of the ACJS. JQ is a refereed, multi-disciplinary journal that publishes theoretical, empirical and interpretive studies of issues related to criminal justice. JQ is indexed in Criminology and Penology Abstracts, Police Science Abstracts, Criminal Justice Periodical Index, and Criminal Justice Abstracts. In the past decade, JQ has become a premier journal and it continues to be a major forum for criminal justice related scholarship, making it an essential part of any library"s holdings.
期刊最新文献
Toward a Standard Measure of Gun Ownership: A Methodological and Theoretical Quandary in Firearm Research Institutional Anomie Theory and Country-Level Public Corruption The Self-Control Ability Scale: Measuring a Key Construct of Situational Action Theory Navigating Entry: The Role of Exposure and Career Fit Negotiation in Women’s Pathways to Policing in the United States Validation of Short-Form Scales of Self-Control, Procedural Justice, and Moral Foundations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1