低碳水化合物饮食与低脂饮食对人体测量指标和体脂百分比影响的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Mina Darand, S. Hassanizadeh, S. Talebi, Zahra Darabi, M. Bagherniya, Fatemeh Yaghoubi, S. Alizadeh, Zeinab Darand, Yasaman Azamian, H. Abdollahzad
{"title":"低碳水化合物饮食与低脂饮食对人体测量指标和体脂百分比影响的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Mina Darand, S. Hassanizadeh, S. Talebi, Zahra Darabi, M. Bagherniya, Fatemeh Yaghoubi, S. Alizadeh, Zeinab Darand, Yasaman Azamian, H. Abdollahzad","doi":"10.18502/jnfs.v8i3.13297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although many studies have been conducted to compare the effect of adherence to a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) with a low-fat diet (LFD) on anthropometric indices and body fat percentage, there is still no definite conclusion in this regard. Therefore, the present study aims to summarize results of studies comparing a LFD and a LCD on weight loss. \nMethods: A systematic search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochran Library was performed up to November 2020. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of adherence to a LCD with a LFD on anthropometric indices and body fat percentage were included. Search results were limited to English-language publications. Sixty-three RCTs, including 7660 participants, were selected for the present study. \nResults: Pooled analysis indicated that adherence to LCD was significantly associated with a greater reduction in BMI (SMD = - 0.07, 95% CI: -0.14,-0.001; P = 0.04), weight (kg) (SMD = - 0.22, 95% CI: - 0.31, - 0.12; P ≤ 0.001), and percentage of body fat mass (SMD = - 0.28, 95% CI: -0.48, - 0.08; P = 0.006) compared to LFD. However, no significant difference in changes of kilogram of body fat mass and waist circumference was observed between the two diet programs. \nConclusion: Overall, adhering to LCD was more effective than LFD in losing weight and body fat percentage.","PeriodicalId":32114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition and Food Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effect of a Low-Carbohydrate Diet with a Low-Fat Diet on Anthropometric Indices and Body Fat Percentage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Mina Darand, S. Hassanizadeh, S. Talebi, Zahra Darabi, M. Bagherniya, Fatemeh Yaghoubi, S. Alizadeh, Zeinab Darand, Yasaman Azamian, H. Abdollahzad\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jnfs.v8i3.13297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Although many studies have been conducted to compare the effect of adherence to a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) with a low-fat diet (LFD) on anthropometric indices and body fat percentage, there is still no definite conclusion in this regard. Therefore, the present study aims to summarize results of studies comparing a LFD and a LCD on weight loss. \\nMethods: A systematic search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochran Library was performed up to November 2020. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of adherence to a LCD with a LFD on anthropometric indices and body fat percentage were included. Search results were limited to English-language publications. Sixty-three RCTs, including 7660 participants, were selected for the present study. \\nResults: Pooled analysis indicated that adherence to LCD was significantly associated with a greater reduction in BMI (SMD = - 0.07, 95% CI: -0.14,-0.001; P = 0.04), weight (kg) (SMD = - 0.22, 95% CI: - 0.31, - 0.12; P ≤ 0.001), and percentage of body fat mass (SMD = - 0.28, 95% CI: -0.48, - 0.08; P = 0.006) compared to LFD. However, no significant difference in changes of kilogram of body fat mass and waist circumference was observed between the two diet programs. \\nConclusion: Overall, adhering to LCD was more effective than LFD in losing weight and body fat percentage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition and Food Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition and Food Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jnfs.v8i3.13297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition and Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jnfs.v8i3.13297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管已经进行了许多研究来比较坚持低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)和低脂饮食(LFD)对人体测量指数和体脂百分比的影响,但在这方面仍然没有确切的结论。因此,本研究旨在总结LFD和LCD在减肥方面的比较研究结果。方法:截至2020年11月,对PubMed、Scopus和Cochran Library等数据库进行了系统检索。包括所有比较LCD和LFD对人体测量指数和体脂百分比的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。搜索结果仅限于英文出版物。本研究选择了63项随机对照试验,包括7660名参与者。结果:汇总分析表明,与LFD相比,坚持LCD与BMI(SMD=-0.07,95%CI:-0.14,-0.001;P=0.04)、体重(kg)(SMD=-0.22,95%CI:-0.31,-0.12;P≤0.001)和体脂百分比(SMD=0.28,95%CI:-0.58,-0.008;P=0.006)的降低显著相关。然而,在两种饮食方案之间,体重和腰围的变化没有显著差异。结论:总的来说,在减肥和体脂率方面,坚持LCD比LFD更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Effect of a Low-Carbohydrate Diet with a Low-Fat Diet on Anthropometric Indices and Body Fat Percentage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Although many studies have been conducted to compare the effect of adherence to a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) with a low-fat diet (LFD) on anthropometric indices and body fat percentage, there is still no definite conclusion in this regard. Therefore, the present study aims to summarize results of studies comparing a LFD and a LCD on weight loss. Methods: A systematic search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochran Library was performed up to November 2020. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of adherence to a LCD with a LFD on anthropometric indices and body fat percentage were included. Search results were limited to English-language publications. Sixty-three RCTs, including 7660 participants, were selected for the present study. Results: Pooled analysis indicated that adherence to LCD was significantly associated with a greater reduction in BMI (SMD = - 0.07, 95% CI: -0.14,-0.001; P = 0.04), weight (kg) (SMD = - 0.22, 95% CI: - 0.31, - 0.12; P ≤ 0.001), and percentage of body fat mass (SMD = - 0.28, 95% CI: -0.48, - 0.08; P = 0.006) compared to LFD. However, no significant difference in changes of kilogram of body fat mass and waist circumference was observed between the two diet programs. Conclusion: Overall, adhering to LCD was more effective than LFD in losing weight and body fat percentage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition and Food Security
Journal of Nutrition and Food Security Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Sodium Nitrite Replacement with Lycopene Pigment in German Sausage and Evaluation of Its Physicochemical, Antimicrobial and Sensory Properties Food Insecurity regarding the Diabetes Mellitus in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis The Study of Food Pathogens in Yazd Traditional Confectionary Products The Association between Dietary Acid Load and Non-Communicable Diseases: A Cohort Study in Shahrekord Women’s Perception and Readiness regarding Adoption of A Healthy and Sustainable Diet: A Cross-Sectional Study in Enugu City, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1