算法、代理和尊重人

Alan Rubel, Clinton Castro, Adam Pham
{"title":"算法、代理和尊重人","authors":"Alan Rubel, Clinton Castro, Adam Pham","doi":"10.5840/soctheorpract202062497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic systems play an increasingly important role in modern life. Much of the scholarship on the moral ramifications of such systems focuses on bias and harm. We argue that understanding the moral salience of algorithmic systems requires understanding the relation between algorithms, autonomy, and agency. We use recent cases in criminal sentencing and K-12 teacher evaluation to outline four key ways in which issues of agency, autonomy, and respect for persons can conflict with algorithmic decisionmaking. Three involve failures to treat individuals with sufficient respect. The fourth involves distancing oneself from morally suspect actions by laundering one’s agency.","PeriodicalId":82726,"journal":{"name":"Social theory and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithms, Agency, and Respect for Persons\",\"authors\":\"Alan Rubel, Clinton Castro, Adam Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/soctheorpract202062497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Algorithmic systems play an increasingly important role in modern life. Much of the scholarship on the moral ramifications of such systems focuses on bias and harm. We argue that understanding the moral salience of algorithmic systems requires understanding the relation between algorithms, autonomy, and agency. We use recent cases in criminal sentencing and K-12 teacher evaluation to outline four key ways in which issues of agency, autonomy, and respect for persons can conflict with algorithmic decisionmaking. Three involve failures to treat individuals with sufficient respect. The fourth involves distancing oneself from morally suspect actions by laundering one’s agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social theory and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract202062497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract202062497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

算法系统在现代生活中发挥着越来越重要的作用。关于这种制度的道德后果的大部分学术都集中在偏见和伤害上。我们认为,理解算法系统的道德显著性需要理解算法、自主性和代理之间的关系。我们利用最近在刑事判决和K-12教师评估中的案例,概述了代理、自主和尊重人的问题与算法决策冲突的四种关键方式。其中三个涉及未能充分尊重个人。第四种是通过清洗自己的机构,使自己远离道德上可疑的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Algorithms, Agency, and Respect for Persons
Algorithmic systems play an increasingly important role in modern life. Much of the scholarship on the moral ramifications of such systems focuses on bias and harm. We argue that understanding the moral salience of algorithmic systems requires understanding the relation between algorithms, autonomy, and agency. We use recent cases in criminal sentencing and K-12 teacher evaluation to outline four key ways in which issues of agency, autonomy, and respect for persons can conflict with algorithmic decisionmaking. Three involve failures to treat individuals with sufficient respect. The fourth involves distancing oneself from morally suspect actions by laundering one’s agency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Defeating Wrongdoing in advance Pleasures of the Flesh in advance Democracy, Epistocracy, and the Voting Age in advance Team Reasoning and Collective Moral Obligation in advance Deepfake Technology and Individual Rights in advance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1