广义DINA模型中q矩阵错配和模型误用对分类精度的影响

M. Gao, M. Miller, Ren Liu
{"title":"广义DINA模型中q矩阵错配和模型误用对分类精度的影响","authors":"M. Gao, M. Miller, Ren Liu","doi":"10.21031/EPOD.332712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This simulation study explored the impact of Q-matrix misspecification and model misuse on examinees’ classification accuracy within the generalized deterministic input, noisy “and” gate (G-DINA) model framework under the different conditions. The data was generated by saturated G-DINA model. Along with the generating model, two reduced models were used to fit the data: the additive CDM (A-CDM) and DINA model. The manipulated conditions included number of respondents, attribute correlations and test length. Two types of classification accuracy were examined: the overall classification accuracy and the class-specific classification accuracy. Results showed that the Q-matrix misspecification influenced classification accuracy more ominously than model misuse. The proportion of examinees classified correctly for each latent class was related to the types of Q-matrix misspecification. More test items had greater positive impact on classification accuracy than more respondents taking the test.","PeriodicalId":43015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD","volume":"8 1","pages":"391-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Q-matrix Misspecification and Model Misuse on Classification Accuracy in the Generalized DINA Model\",\"authors\":\"M. Gao, M. Miller, Ren Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.21031/EPOD.332712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This simulation study explored the impact of Q-matrix misspecification and model misuse on examinees’ classification accuracy within the generalized deterministic input, noisy “and” gate (G-DINA) model framework under the different conditions. The data was generated by saturated G-DINA model. Along with the generating model, two reduced models were used to fit the data: the additive CDM (A-CDM) and DINA model. The manipulated conditions included number of respondents, attribute correlations and test length. Two types of classification accuracy were examined: the overall classification accuracy and the class-specific classification accuracy. Results showed that the Q-matrix misspecification influenced classification accuracy more ominously than model misuse. The proportion of examinees classified correctly for each latent class was related to the types of Q-matrix misspecification. More test items had greater positive impact on classification accuracy than more respondents taking the test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"391-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21031/EPOD.332712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21031/EPOD.332712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本仿真研究探讨了在广义确定性输入、噪声和门(G-DINA)模型框架下,不同条件下q矩阵错配和模型误用对考生分类准确率的影响。数据采用饱和G-DINA模型生成。在生成模型的同时,使用了两个简化模型:加性CDM (A-CDM)模型和DINA模型来拟合数据。操纵条件包括应答者数量、属性相关性和测试长度。研究了两种类型的分类精度:整体分类精度和特定类别分类精度。结果表明,q矩阵的错配对分类精度的影响要大于模型的错配。每个潜在类别中被正确分类的考生比例与q矩阵错配的类型有关。更多的测试项目对分类准确性的正向影响大于更多的受访者参加测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Q-matrix Misspecification and Model Misuse on Classification Accuracy in the Generalized DINA Model
This simulation study explored the impact of Q-matrix misspecification and model misuse on examinees’ classification accuracy within the generalized deterministic input, noisy “and” gate (G-DINA) model framework under the different conditions. The data was generated by saturated G-DINA model. Along with the generating model, two reduced models were used to fit the data: the additive CDM (A-CDM) and DINA model. The manipulated conditions included number of respondents, attribute correlations and test length. Two types of classification accuracy were examined: the overall classification accuracy and the class-specific classification accuracy. Results showed that the Q-matrix misspecification influenced classification accuracy more ominously than model misuse. The proportion of examinees classified correctly for each latent class was related to the types of Q-matrix misspecification. More test items had greater positive impact on classification accuracy than more respondents taking the test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Learning analytics in formative assessment: A systematic literature review Analysis of Peer and Self-Assessments Using the Many-facet Rasch Measurement Model and Student Opinions Ability Estimation with Polytomous Items in Computerized Multistage Tests Investigation of The Measurement Invariance of Affective Characteristics Related to TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Achievement by Gender A Bibliometric Analysis on Power Analysis Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1