老年医疗保险患者糖尿病护理系统中医师绩效的价值:绩效报酬的含义

D. Maeng, G. Rohrer, Msph James M. Pitcavage, Do John B. Bulger
{"title":"老年医疗保险患者糖尿病护理系统中医师绩效的价值:绩效报酬的含义","authors":"D. Maeng, G. Rohrer, Msph James M. Pitcavage, Do John B. Bulger","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While pay-for-performance (P4P) is an appealing method of influencing physician behavior, the direct impact of P4P on quality performance and return on investment remains unknown. This study seeks to quantify in dollar terms the value of incremental improvements in Geisinger’s Diabetes System of Care (DSC) – i.e., an all-or-none “bundle” of nine diabetes-related performance measures – among Medicare Advantage members attributable to individual primary care physicians (PCPs). The results indicate that a one-percentage point improvement in the percent of a PCP’s patients with diabetes that met all the DSC elements in a given year – i.e., DSC bundle score – was associated with approximately $4 per-member-per-month (in 2006 dollars) reduction in total medical cost incurred in the same year.  This was driven mainly by reductions in inpatient cost. Moreover, there is variation in how much each DSC element contributes to the cost reduction.  Among the nine elements, urine protein testing and blood pressure measurements were most consistently associated with lower total medical costs. These findings suggest the DSC may be useful in establishing a feasible P4P scheme that incentivizes PCPs to improve diabetes care quality.","PeriodicalId":56181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Finance","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of Physician Performance in Diabetes System of Care Among the Elderly Medicare Patients: Implications for Pay-for-Performance\",\"authors\":\"D. Maeng, G. Rohrer, Msph James M. Pitcavage, Do John B. Bulger\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2330-0698.1483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While pay-for-performance (P4P) is an appealing method of influencing physician behavior, the direct impact of P4P on quality performance and return on investment remains unknown. This study seeks to quantify in dollar terms the value of incremental improvements in Geisinger’s Diabetes System of Care (DSC) – i.e., an all-or-none “bundle” of nine diabetes-related performance measures – among Medicare Advantage members attributable to individual primary care physicians (PCPs). The results indicate that a one-percentage point improvement in the percent of a PCP’s patients with diabetes that met all the DSC elements in a given year – i.e., DSC bundle score – was associated with approximately $4 per-member-per-month (in 2006 dollars) reduction in total medical cost incurred in the same year.  This was driven mainly by reductions in inpatient cost. Moreover, there is variation in how much each DSC element contributes to the cost reduction.  Among the nine elements, urine protein testing and blood pressure measurements were most consistently associated with lower total medical costs. These findings suggest the DSC may be useful in establishing a feasible P4P scheme that incentivizes PCPs to improve diabetes care quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然绩效付费(P4P)是一种影响医生行为的有吸引力的方法,但P4P对质量绩效和投资回报的直接影响仍然未知。这项研究试图用美元来量化盖辛格糖尿病护理系统(DSC)的增量改进的价值,即在个人初级保健医生(PCP)的Medicare Advantage成员中,九项糖尿病相关绩效指标的全部或全部“捆绑”。结果表明,在给定的一年中,符合所有DSC要素的PCP糖尿病患者的百分比(即DSC捆绑评分)提高一个百分点,与同一年每位会员每月(以2006年美元计)的总医疗费用减少约4美元有关。这主要是由于住院费用的降低。此外,每个DSC元件对成本降低的贡献程度存在变化。在这九项要素中,尿蛋白检测和血压测量与较低的总医疗成本最为一致。这些发现表明,DSC可能有助于建立一个可行的P4P计划,激励PCP提高糖尿病护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value of Physician Performance in Diabetes System of Care Among the Elderly Medicare Patients: Implications for Pay-for-Performance
While pay-for-performance (P4P) is an appealing method of influencing physician behavior, the direct impact of P4P on quality performance and return on investment remains unknown. This study seeks to quantify in dollar terms the value of incremental improvements in Geisinger’s Diabetes System of Care (DSC) – i.e., an all-or-none “bundle” of nine diabetes-related performance measures – among Medicare Advantage members attributable to individual primary care physicians (PCPs). The results indicate that a one-percentage point improvement in the percent of a PCP’s patients with diabetes that met all the DSC elements in a given year – i.e., DSC bundle score – was associated with approximately $4 per-member-per-month (in 2006 dollars) reduction in total medical cost incurred in the same year.  This was driven mainly by reductions in inpatient cost. Moreover, there is variation in how much each DSC element contributes to the cost reduction.  Among the nine elements, urine protein testing and blood pressure measurements were most consistently associated with lower total medical costs. These findings suggest the DSC may be useful in establishing a feasible P4P scheme that incentivizes PCPs to improve diabetes care quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Finance
Journal of Health Care Finance Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Finance is the only quarterly journal devoted solely to helping you meet your facility"s financial goals. Each issue targets a key area of health care finance. Stay alert to new trends, opportunities, and threats. Make easier, better decisions, with advice from industry experts. Learn from the experiences of other health care organizations. Experts in the field share their experiences on successful programs, proven strategies, practical management tools, and innovative alternatives. The Journal covers today"s most complex dollars-and-cents issues, including hospital/physician contracts, alternative delivery systems, generating maximum margins under PPS.
期刊最新文献
Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization. Equity Issuance of Health Care Firms after the 2007 Market Crash and the 2010 Affordable Care Act Value of Physician Performance in Diabetes System of Care Among the Elderly Medicare Patients: Implications for Pay-for-Performance Assessing the cost burden of United States FDA-mandated post-approval studies for medical devices. The Growing Importance of Cost Accounting for Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1