D. Maeng, G. Rohrer, Msph James M. Pitcavage, Do John B. Bulger
{"title":"老年医疗保险患者糖尿病护理系统中医师绩效的价值:绩效报酬的含义","authors":"D. Maeng, G. Rohrer, Msph James M. Pitcavage, Do John B. Bulger","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While pay-for-performance (P4P) is an appealing method of influencing physician behavior, the direct impact of P4P on quality performance and return on investment remains unknown. This study seeks to quantify in dollar terms the value of incremental improvements in Geisinger’s Diabetes System of Care (DSC) – i.e., an all-or-none “bundle” of nine diabetes-related performance measures – among Medicare Advantage members attributable to individual primary care physicians (PCPs). The results indicate that a one-percentage point improvement in the percent of a PCP’s patients with diabetes that met all the DSC elements in a given year – i.e., DSC bundle score – was associated with approximately $4 per-member-per-month (in 2006 dollars) reduction in total medical cost incurred in the same year. This was driven mainly by reductions in inpatient cost. Moreover, there is variation in how much each DSC element contributes to the cost reduction. Among the nine elements, urine protein testing and blood pressure measurements were most consistently associated with lower total medical costs. These findings suggest the DSC may be useful in establishing a feasible P4P scheme that incentivizes PCPs to improve diabetes care quality.","PeriodicalId":56181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Finance","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of Physician Performance in Diabetes System of Care Among the Elderly Medicare Patients: Implications for Pay-for-Performance\",\"authors\":\"D. Maeng, G. Rohrer, Msph James M. Pitcavage, Do John B. Bulger\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2330-0698.1483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While pay-for-performance (P4P) is an appealing method of influencing physician behavior, the direct impact of P4P on quality performance and return on investment remains unknown. This study seeks to quantify in dollar terms the value of incremental improvements in Geisinger’s Diabetes System of Care (DSC) – i.e., an all-or-none “bundle” of nine diabetes-related performance measures – among Medicare Advantage members attributable to individual primary care physicians (PCPs). The results indicate that a one-percentage point improvement in the percent of a PCP’s patients with diabetes that met all the DSC elements in a given year – i.e., DSC bundle score – was associated with approximately $4 per-member-per-month (in 2006 dollars) reduction in total medical cost incurred in the same year. This was driven mainly by reductions in inpatient cost. Moreover, there is variation in how much each DSC element contributes to the cost reduction. Among the nine elements, urine protein testing and blood pressure measurements were most consistently associated with lower total medical costs. These findings suggest the DSC may be useful in establishing a feasible P4P scheme that incentivizes PCPs to improve diabetes care quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Value of Physician Performance in Diabetes System of Care Among the Elderly Medicare Patients: Implications for Pay-for-Performance
While pay-for-performance (P4P) is an appealing method of influencing physician behavior, the direct impact of P4P on quality performance and return on investment remains unknown. This study seeks to quantify in dollar terms the value of incremental improvements in Geisinger’s Diabetes System of Care (DSC) – i.e., an all-or-none “bundle” of nine diabetes-related performance measures – among Medicare Advantage members attributable to individual primary care physicians (PCPs). The results indicate that a one-percentage point improvement in the percent of a PCP’s patients with diabetes that met all the DSC elements in a given year – i.e., DSC bundle score – was associated with approximately $4 per-member-per-month (in 2006 dollars) reduction in total medical cost incurred in the same year. This was driven mainly by reductions in inpatient cost. Moreover, there is variation in how much each DSC element contributes to the cost reduction. Among the nine elements, urine protein testing and blood pressure measurements were most consistently associated with lower total medical costs. These findings suggest the DSC may be useful in establishing a feasible P4P scheme that incentivizes PCPs to improve diabetes care quality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Health Care Finance is the only quarterly journal devoted solely to helping you meet your facility"s financial goals. Each issue targets a key area of health care finance. Stay alert to new trends, opportunities, and threats. Make easier, better decisions, with advice from industry experts. Learn from the experiences of other health care organizations. Experts in the field share their experiences on successful programs, proven strategies, practical management tools, and innovative alternatives. The Journal covers today"s most complex dollars-and-cents issues, including hospital/physician contracts, alternative delivery systems, generating maximum margins under PPS.