辐射诱发皮肤反应中皮内G-CSF浸润的随机II期试验

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BioMedicine-Taiwan Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.51248/.v43i3.736
Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar
{"title":"辐射诱发皮肤反应中皮内G-CSF浸润的随机II期试验","authors":"Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar","doi":"10.51248/.v43i3.736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.\n \nMaterials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.\n \nResults: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days  time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).\n \nConclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.","PeriodicalId":51650,"journal":{"name":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomised phase II trial of intra-dermal G-CSF infiltration in radiation induced skin reactions\",\"authors\":\"Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar\",\"doi\":\"10.51248/.v43i3.736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.\\n \\nMaterials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.\\n \\nResults: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days  time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).\\n \\nConclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的:辐射诱导的皮肤反应(RISR)通常会延迟治疗,影响依从性和结果。众所周知,粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可以募集成皮干细胞并帮助愈合。很少有研究评估其在这方面的潜力。与传统治疗3/4级RISR相比,本研究评估了G-CSF的皮内浸润的有效性、对治疗延迟和生活质量的影响。材料和方法:因2 Gy当量剂量的50 Gy以上的任何外照射方案而经历晚期RISR的患者被随机接受治疗,要么在病变边缘和基底进行皮内G-CSF浸润,要么接受常规治疗,要么只接受常规抗炎/抗生素治疗。实验组和对照组分别有62名和60名患者分析了再上皮化和治疗延迟所需的时间。Also.在治疗前和治疗后两周,对各组的整体生活质量和疼痛评分进行定性比较。结果:G-CSF组再上皮化平均耗时5.2天(95%可信区间4.4-5.7),明显少于常规治疗组(平均7.5天,95%可信区间6.8-8.1,p=0.002)。对照组与实验组相比,10天内未消退的毒性调整危险比为2.98(p=0.046)。G-CSF组的治疗差距显著较小(48.4%对68.3%,p=0.026),平均治疗延迟显著减少(p 0.001)。实验组10天延迟调整后的生存率显著提高(Mantel-Cox-Log秩检验,X2=12.26,p 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomised phase II trial of intra-dermal G-CSF infiltration in radiation induced skin reactions
Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.   Materials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.   Results: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days  time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).   Conclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioMedicine-Taiwan
BioMedicine-Taiwan MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acute kidney injury induced lithium toxicity with concomitant neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Effect of Mucuna pruriens seed extract on depression-like behavior derived from mild traumatic brain injury in rats. Effect of alantolactones on cardiac parameters of animals under artificially induced oxidative stress. Effect of inulin from dahlia tubers (Dahlia variabilis) extract on insulitis severity and insulin expression in diabetic rats. Loss of tyrosine 211 phosphorylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) enhances postnatal mammary gland development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1