农村学校跨层级实施积极行为支持的研究

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Rural Special Education Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1177/87568705221097114
Erin A. Chaparro, Angus Kittelman, Sara C. McDaniel, Heather Peshak George, J. VanLone, SoLing So
{"title":"农村学校跨层级实施积极行为支持的研究","authors":"Erin A. Chaparro, Angus Kittelman, Sara C. McDaniel, Heather Peshak George, J. VanLone, SoLing So","doi":"10.1177/87568705221097114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a prevention-oriented multitiered system of support. In this article, we discuss how PBIS implementation might be different for schools in rural settings. We used two subsamples of an extant data set of 11,561 schools in 44 U.S. states reporting on PBIS implementation fidelity during the 2018-19 school year. We examined PBIS implementation in rural and nonrural settings using a subsample of 6,631 schools during their first five years of PBIS implementation (2014-15 to 2018-19 school years). Further, we used a subsample of 2,266 schools to examine differences in implementation for rural schools, specifically (n = 1,215) in their first five years of PBIS implementation (2014-15 to 2018-19) compared to rural schools (n = 1,051) implementing six or more years (2000-01 to 2013-14). Rural schools differ from other school locales in the implementation of Tiers 2 and 3 systems during initial implementation. When examining the implementation in rural schools implementing PBIS for five or fewer years to those implementing for six years or more, those implementing longer had higher scores at Tiers 2 and 3. Practical implications across all three tiers, special education, and rural locales are presented.","PeriodicalId":45133,"journal":{"name":"Rural Special Education Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Rural School Implementation of Positive Behavioral Supports Across Tiers\",\"authors\":\"Erin A. Chaparro, Angus Kittelman, Sara C. McDaniel, Heather Peshak George, J. VanLone, SoLing So\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87568705221097114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a prevention-oriented multitiered system of support. In this article, we discuss how PBIS implementation might be different for schools in rural settings. We used two subsamples of an extant data set of 11,561 schools in 44 U.S. states reporting on PBIS implementation fidelity during the 2018-19 school year. We examined PBIS implementation in rural and nonrural settings using a subsample of 6,631 schools during their first five years of PBIS implementation (2014-15 to 2018-19 school years). Further, we used a subsample of 2,266 schools to examine differences in implementation for rural schools, specifically (n = 1,215) in their first five years of PBIS implementation (2014-15 to 2018-19) compared to rural schools (n = 1,051) implementing six or more years (2000-01 to 2013-14). Rural schools differ from other school locales in the implementation of Tiers 2 and 3 systems during initial implementation. When examining the implementation in rural schools implementing PBIS for five or fewer years to those implementing for six years or more, those implementing longer had higher scores at Tiers 2 and 3. Practical implications across all three tiers, special education, and rural locales are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural Special Education Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural Special Education Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221097114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Special Education Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221097114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

积极行为干预和支持(PBIS)是一个以预防为导向的多层支持系统。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了PBIS在农村环境中的实施可能会有什么不同。我们使用了美国44个州11561所学校的现有数据集的两个子样本,报告了2018-19学年PBIS实施的保真度。我们使用6631所学校在PBIS实施的前五年(2014-15至2018-19学年)的子样本,研究了农村和非农村环境中PBIS的实施情况。此外,我们使用2266所学校的子样本来研究农村学校的实施差异,特别是在实施PBIS的前五年(2014-15至2018-19),与实施六年或六年以上(2000-01至2013-14)的农村学校(n=1051)相比。在最初实施期间,农村学校在实施二级和三级系统方面与其他学校不同。在研究实施PBIS五年或五年以下的农村学校与实施PBIS六年或六年以上的农村学校的实施情况时,实施时间较长的学校在二级和三级的得分较高。介绍了所有三个层次、特殊教育和农村地区的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Rural School Implementation of Positive Behavioral Supports Across Tiers
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a prevention-oriented multitiered system of support. In this article, we discuss how PBIS implementation might be different for schools in rural settings. We used two subsamples of an extant data set of 11,561 schools in 44 U.S. states reporting on PBIS implementation fidelity during the 2018-19 school year. We examined PBIS implementation in rural and nonrural settings using a subsample of 6,631 schools during their first five years of PBIS implementation (2014-15 to 2018-19 school years). Further, we used a subsample of 2,266 schools to examine differences in implementation for rural schools, specifically (n = 1,215) in their first five years of PBIS implementation (2014-15 to 2018-19) compared to rural schools (n = 1,051) implementing six or more years (2000-01 to 2013-14). Rural schools differ from other school locales in the implementation of Tiers 2 and 3 systems during initial implementation. When examining the implementation in rural schools implementing PBIS for five or fewer years to those implementing for six years or more, those implementing longer had higher scores at Tiers 2 and 3. Practical implications across all three tiers, special education, and rural locales are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Rural Special Education Quarterly EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Preparing Future Special Education Faculty for Service in Rural Communities Riding Fences Inference Instruction for Students With Reading Disabilities A Survey of Rural Special Education Teachers’ Professional Development Experiences What Do Rural Special Education Teachers Say? Examining the Reported Needs and Recommendations for Retention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1