布鲁诺·拉图尔访谈

Nicola Manghi
{"title":"布鲁诺·拉图尔访谈","authors":"Nicola Manghi","doi":"10.4000/QDS.2075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bruno Latour is a renowned author whose works have influenced all branches of social sciences in the last thirty years. After his path-breaking ethnographies of scientific laboratories and the development, alongside M. Callon, of Actor-Network-Theory, his recent works focus mainly on political ecology and the issue of global warming. In this interview, we have asked Latour to retrace the path that, following a more linear trajectory than one might expect, brought him from the sociology of scientific knowledge to deal with political ecology.According to Latour, the concerns that stood at the core of his works on science and technology can provide deeper insights into the politics of climate change. What geologists have recently named as the “Anthropocene” (that is, our current geological era marked by anthropogenic climate change) is a hybrid entity just like the socio-technical networks he had described in Laboratory Life and Science in Action. Only by developing a social science that is hospitable to non-human entities is it possible to imagine a way to deal politically with environmental issues.The ecological crisis calls for a readjustment of political affects similar to the one that was brought about by the social question between XIX and XX centuries, that is, one that entails an alliance between social sciences, politics, science, and arts. Latour’s own recent work, by engaging in collaborations with both scientists and artists, points in this direction.","PeriodicalId":55721,"journal":{"name":"Quaderni di Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervista a Bruno Latour\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Manghi\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/QDS.2075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bruno Latour is a renowned author whose works have influenced all branches of social sciences in the last thirty years. After his path-breaking ethnographies of scientific laboratories and the development, alongside M. Callon, of Actor-Network-Theory, his recent works focus mainly on political ecology and the issue of global warming. In this interview, we have asked Latour to retrace the path that, following a more linear trajectory than one might expect, brought him from the sociology of scientific knowledge to deal with political ecology.According to Latour, the concerns that stood at the core of his works on science and technology can provide deeper insights into the politics of climate change. What geologists have recently named as the “Anthropocene” (that is, our current geological era marked by anthropogenic climate change) is a hybrid entity just like the socio-technical networks he had described in Laboratory Life and Science in Action. Only by developing a social science that is hospitable to non-human entities is it possible to imagine a way to deal politically with environmental issues.The ecological crisis calls for a readjustment of political affects similar to the one that was brought about by the social question between XIX and XX centuries, that is, one that entails an alliance between social sciences, politics, science, and arts. Latour’s own recent work, by engaging in collaborations with both scientists and artists, points in this direction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaderni di Sociologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaderni di Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/QDS.2075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderni di Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/QDS.2075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布鲁诺·拉图尔是一位著名的作家,他的作品在过去三十年中影响了社会科学的各个分支。在他开创性的科学实验室人种学和演员网络理论的发展之后,他最近的作品主要关注政治生态学和全球变暖问题。在这次采访中,我们请拉图尔沿着一条比人们预期的更线性的轨迹,重新走上一条道路,这条道路将他从科学知识社会学带到了处理政治生态学的道路上。拉图尔认为,他科学技术作品的核心问题可以为气候变化政治提供更深入的见解。地质学家最近称之为“人类世”(即我们当前以人为气候变化为标志的地质时代)是一个混合实体,就像他在《实验室生活与科学在行动》中描述的社会技术网络一样。只有发展出一种适合非人类实体的社会科学,才有可能想象出一种在政治上处理环境问题的方法。生态危机要求重新调整政治影响,类似于十九世纪至二十世纪社会问题带来的影响,即社会科学、政治、科学和艺术之间的联盟。拉图尔自己最近的作品,通过与科学家和艺术家的合作,指向了这个方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intervista a Bruno Latour
Bruno Latour is a renowned author whose works have influenced all branches of social sciences in the last thirty years. After his path-breaking ethnographies of scientific laboratories and the development, alongside M. Callon, of Actor-Network-Theory, his recent works focus mainly on political ecology and the issue of global warming. In this interview, we have asked Latour to retrace the path that, following a more linear trajectory than one might expect, brought him from the sociology of scientific knowledge to deal with political ecology.According to Latour, the concerns that stood at the core of his works on science and technology can provide deeper insights into the politics of climate change. What geologists have recently named as the “Anthropocene” (that is, our current geological era marked by anthropogenic climate change) is a hybrid entity just like the socio-technical networks he had described in Laboratory Life and Science in Action. Only by developing a social science that is hospitable to non-human entities is it possible to imagine a way to deal politically with environmental issues.The ecological crisis calls for a readjustment of political affects similar to the one that was brought about by the social question between XIX and XX centuries, that is, one that entails an alliance between social sciences, politics, science, and arts. Latour’s own recent work, by engaging in collaborations with both scientists and artists, points in this direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Moving away from civilization: the case of Italy. An overview and presentation Magda Talamo (1928-2022) Camilla Borgna, Studiare da straniero. Immigrazione e diseguaglianze nei sistemi scolastici europei Why it is not a shame to evade tax in Italy Human capital to come. Death and rebirth of a theory?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1