“不会留下任何伤疤”:执行团队成员的创伤和应对

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Prison Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1177/00328855211029623
Casey Chiappetta, Rob Johnson
{"title":"“不会留下任何伤疤”:执行团队成员的创伤和应对","authors":"Casey Chiappetta, Rob Johnson","doi":"10.1177/00328855211029623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A trauma framework is applied to the experiences of execution team members. A directed content analysis of three seminal publications is used to investigate how execution team members respond to observing and participating in executions, a potentially traumatic stressor. Through these texts, supplemented by other research, the study finds that the execution process, meant to facilitate executions and insulate execution team officers from stress, only partially achieves these goals. The findings suggest that many of the concepts central to understanding executioners at work—how they understand and cope with their roles—are dynamic rather than static and vary in degree across persons and situations. Execution team officers report varying degrees of difficulty fully rationalizing and diffusing responsibility for their actions, ultimately leading to internal conflict and stress about the death penalty and participation in executions.","PeriodicalId":47409,"journal":{"name":"Prison Journal","volume":"101 1","pages":"379 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00328855211029623","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“It’s Not Gonna Leave Any Scars”: Trauma and Coping Among Execution Team Members\",\"authors\":\"Casey Chiappetta, Rob Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00328855211029623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A trauma framework is applied to the experiences of execution team members. A directed content analysis of three seminal publications is used to investigate how execution team members respond to observing and participating in executions, a potentially traumatic stressor. Through these texts, supplemented by other research, the study finds that the execution process, meant to facilitate executions and insulate execution team officers from stress, only partially achieves these goals. The findings suggest that many of the concepts central to understanding executioners at work—how they understand and cope with their roles—are dynamic rather than static and vary in degree across persons and situations. Execution team officers report varying degrees of difficulty fully rationalizing and diffusing responsibility for their actions, ultimately leading to internal conflict and stress about the death penalty and participation in executions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prison Journal\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"379 - 397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00328855211029623\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prison Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211029623\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prison Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211029623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

创伤框架应用于执行团队成员的经历。对三份具有开创性意义的出版物进行了直接内容分析,以调查执行团队成员对观察和参与处决(一种潜在的创伤压力源)的反应。通过这些文本,再加上其他研究,研究发现,旨在促进处决并使行刑队官员免受压力的处决过程只部分实现了这些目标。研究结果表明,理解工作中的刽子手的许多核心概念——他们如何理解和应对自己的角色——是动态的,而不是静态的,并且在不同的人和情况下程度不同。执行小组官员报告说,在充分合理化和分散对其行为的责任方面存在不同程度的困难,最终导致内部冲突,并对死刑和参与处决感到压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“It’s Not Gonna Leave Any Scars”: Trauma and Coping Among Execution Team Members
A trauma framework is applied to the experiences of execution team members. A directed content analysis of three seminal publications is used to investigate how execution team members respond to observing and participating in executions, a potentially traumatic stressor. Through these texts, supplemented by other research, the study finds that the execution process, meant to facilitate executions and insulate execution team officers from stress, only partially achieves these goals. The findings suggest that many of the concepts central to understanding executioners at work—how they understand and cope with their roles—are dynamic rather than static and vary in degree across persons and situations. Execution team officers report varying degrees of difficulty fully rationalizing and diffusing responsibility for their actions, ultimately leading to internal conflict and stress about the death penalty and participation in executions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prison Journal
Prison Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The editorial team"s aim is to establish The Prison Journal as a focal point and the forum of choice for studies, ideas, and discussion of adult and juvenile confinement, treatment interventions, and alternative sanctions.
期刊最新文献
What Do Correctional Leaders Think About Faith-Based Programs? Results From a National Survey Walking an EmotionalTightrope: Examining the Carceral Emotion Culture(s) of Federal Prisons for Women in Canada Deconstructing the Power Dynamics of Prison Research Health-Related Experiences, Needs, and Challenges of Transgender People in Prisons: A Systematic Review When Checking a Box is not Enough: The (Un)Readability of PREA Messaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1