亚洲壶菌感染:我们知道多少?我们还需要知道什么?

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Herpetological Journal Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.33256/hj30.2.99111
Md. Mokhlesur Rahman, Mahatub Khan Badhon, M. Salauddin, Md. Fazle Rabbe, M. Islam
{"title":"亚洲壶菌感染:我们知道多少?我们还需要知道什么?","authors":"Md. Mokhlesur Rahman, Mahatub Khan Badhon, M. Salauddin, Md. Fazle Rabbe, M. Islam","doi":"10.33256/hj30.2.99111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the knowledge base for amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) infection in the continent of Asia. Despite an indication of geographic bias in terms of studying chytrid fungus distribution in Asia, 167 amphibian species (145 spp. native to Asia) from 16 countries have been reported as infected with Bd. Our meta-analysis shows that overall prevalence is 8.19 % (out of 28,433 samples), and Bd-positive rate in amphibia significantly varies among sampling sources (χ2= 380.57, DF= 6, P< 0.001) and age categories (χ2= 22.09, DF= 2, P< 0.001). We used Kernel Density analysis to produce a hotspot map for chytrid infection, and Digital Elevation Model to understand the distribution of chytrid positive locations across different elevations. In our meta-analysis, most of the Bd-positive sites range between 4.45–27.49 °C, 167–4,353 mm rainfall, 10–40°N, and at lower elevations (<500 m). Using land cover analysis, we did not find a statistically significant difference among six different land cover categories in relation to the prevalence of Bd across Asia. Although no mass die-off events have been reported so far, Maximum Entropy modelling shows that Bd distribution and infection may potentially occur across a vast region of south-east Asia. In conclusion, we call for more systematic research and monitoring strategies in place for countries with little to no information, but have a moderately higher risk of chytrid distribution and infection.","PeriodicalId":56131,"journal":{"name":"Herpetological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chytrid infection in Asia: How much do we know and what else do we need to know?\",\"authors\":\"Md. Mokhlesur Rahman, Mahatub Khan Badhon, M. Salauddin, Md. Fazle Rabbe, M. Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.33256/hj30.2.99111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the knowledge base for amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) infection in the continent of Asia. Despite an indication of geographic bias in terms of studying chytrid fungus distribution in Asia, 167 amphibian species (145 spp. native to Asia) from 16 countries have been reported as infected with Bd. Our meta-analysis shows that overall prevalence is 8.19 % (out of 28,433 samples), and Bd-positive rate in amphibia significantly varies among sampling sources (χ2= 380.57, DF= 6, P< 0.001) and age categories (χ2= 22.09, DF= 2, P< 0.001). We used Kernel Density analysis to produce a hotspot map for chytrid infection, and Digital Elevation Model to understand the distribution of chytrid positive locations across different elevations. In our meta-analysis, most of the Bd-positive sites range between 4.45–27.49 °C, 167–4,353 mm rainfall, 10–40°N, and at lower elevations (<500 m). Using land cover analysis, we did not find a statistically significant difference among six different land cover categories in relation to the prevalence of Bd across Asia. Although no mass die-off events have been reported so far, Maximum Entropy modelling shows that Bd distribution and infection may potentially occur across a vast region of south-east Asia. In conclusion, we call for more systematic research and monitoring strategies in place for countries with little to no information, but have a moderately higher risk of chytrid distribution and infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herpetological Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herpetological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.2.99111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herpetological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33256/hj30.2.99111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估亚洲大陆两栖动物壶菌Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis(Bd)感染的知识库。尽管在研究壶菌在亚洲的分布方面存在地理偏见,但据报道,来自16个国家的167种两栖动物(145种原产于亚洲)感染了Bd。我们的荟萃分析显示,总体患病率为8.19%(在28433个样本中),两栖动物的Bd阳性率在采样源(χ2=380.57,DF=6,P<0.001)和年龄类别(χ2=22.09,DF=2,P<0.001。在我们的荟萃分析中,大多数Bd阳性位点的温度范围在4.45–27.49°C、167–4353 mm降雨量、10–40°N之间,海拔较低(<500 m)。使用土地覆盖分析,我们没有发现六种不同的土地覆盖类别与亚洲Bd流行率之间存在统计学上的显著差异。尽管到目前为止还没有大规模死亡事件的报道,但最大熵模型显示,Bd的分布和感染可能发生在东南亚的广大地区。总之,我们呼吁对信息很少或根本没有信息,但乳糜泻分布和感染风险略高的国家进行更系统的研究和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chytrid infection in Asia: How much do we know and what else do we need to know?
We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the knowledge base for amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) infection in the continent of Asia. Despite an indication of geographic bias in terms of studying chytrid fungus distribution in Asia, 167 amphibian species (145 spp. native to Asia) from 16 countries have been reported as infected with Bd. Our meta-analysis shows that overall prevalence is 8.19 % (out of 28,433 samples), and Bd-positive rate in amphibia significantly varies among sampling sources (χ2= 380.57, DF= 6, P< 0.001) and age categories (χ2= 22.09, DF= 2, P< 0.001). We used Kernel Density analysis to produce a hotspot map for chytrid infection, and Digital Elevation Model to understand the distribution of chytrid positive locations across different elevations. In our meta-analysis, most of the Bd-positive sites range between 4.45–27.49 °C, 167–4,353 mm rainfall, 10–40°N, and at lower elevations (<500 m). Using land cover analysis, we did not find a statistically significant difference among six different land cover categories in relation to the prevalence of Bd across Asia. Although no mass die-off events have been reported so far, Maximum Entropy modelling shows that Bd distribution and infection may potentially occur across a vast region of south-east Asia. In conclusion, we call for more systematic research and monitoring strategies in place for countries with little to no information, but have a moderately higher risk of chytrid distribution and infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herpetological Journal
Herpetological Journal 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Herpetological Journal is the Society''s prestigious quarterly scientific journal.
期刊最新文献
The plasticity of metamorphic traits in the Chinese brown frog tadpoles fails to obey Richards' hypothesis Intensive and efficient egg-laying tempo of the parthenogenesis mourning gecko Lepidodactylus lugubris Fungal pathogen infection intensity associated with reproductive mode and elevation in an afrotropical anuran community Morphological anomalies of tadpoles from a contaminated stream in the state of Tlaxcala, Mexico Bayesian insights into Green Pit Viper Trimeresurus (Cryptelytrops) macrops sexual dimorphism with respect to influence of gravidity and habitat disturbance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1