技术干预口吃:系统回顾

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION Technology and Disability Pub Date : 2022-05-26 DOI:10.3233/tad-220379
C. Chaudhary, Sunila John, Senthil D. Kumaran, V. Guddattu, G. Krishnan
{"title":"技术干预口吃:系统回顾","authors":"C. Chaudhary, Sunila John, Senthil D. Kumaran, V. Guddattu, G. Krishnan","doi":"10.3233/tad-220379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Technology in recent times has shown exciting advancements. These advancements have been implemented in healthcare settings to improve therapeutic outcomes. Within the domain of communication disorders, stuttering has witnessed the implementation of a wide variety of technological interventions. The paper provides a comprehensive review and availability of the current status of technology-based stuttering intervention programs, their advantages and disadvantages, and a few directions for future research. AIM: This review aimed to systematically identify the technologies used in stuttering intervention and explore the effect of these interventions on dysfluencies in stuttering. METHOD: We followed the conventional systematic review process and searched six electronic databases using relevant keywords. We included intervention studies published since 1990 on individuals diagnosed with developmental stuttering. In addition, all studies that used technological intervention such as device(s), computer programs, and mobile phone applications were included. RESULT: Fifty-nine studies were included after a thorough eligibility check. The major categories of technological rehabilitation include telehealth technology, software programs, biofeedback, virtual reality, video-self modeling, neuromodulation, and altered auditory feedback. In general, the results show a beneficial effect of technological intervention in reducing stuttering. Further, this review identifies reduction of the duration and minimal to no side effects with such intervention technologies in stuttering. Finally, the percentage of stuttered syllables (%SS) emerged as the most common outcome measure in technology-based intervention in stuttering. CONCLUSION: A wide variety of technological applications have been implemented in stuttering intervention. Regardless of type, all the studies that aimed to examine the effect of the technological intervention on stuttering reported positive outcomes. This review highlights technology-based stuttering intervention programs’ current status and impact on stuttering dysfluencies. Further, it highlights several advantages and disadvantages of implementing technology-based, and a few directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":22201,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Disability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technological interventions in stuttering: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"C. Chaudhary, Sunila John, Senthil D. Kumaran, V. Guddattu, G. Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/tad-220379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Technology in recent times has shown exciting advancements. These advancements have been implemented in healthcare settings to improve therapeutic outcomes. Within the domain of communication disorders, stuttering has witnessed the implementation of a wide variety of technological interventions. The paper provides a comprehensive review and availability of the current status of technology-based stuttering intervention programs, their advantages and disadvantages, and a few directions for future research. AIM: This review aimed to systematically identify the technologies used in stuttering intervention and explore the effect of these interventions on dysfluencies in stuttering. METHOD: We followed the conventional systematic review process and searched six electronic databases using relevant keywords. We included intervention studies published since 1990 on individuals diagnosed with developmental stuttering. In addition, all studies that used technological intervention such as device(s), computer programs, and mobile phone applications were included. RESULT: Fifty-nine studies were included after a thorough eligibility check. The major categories of technological rehabilitation include telehealth technology, software programs, biofeedback, virtual reality, video-self modeling, neuromodulation, and altered auditory feedback. In general, the results show a beneficial effect of technological intervention in reducing stuttering. Further, this review identifies reduction of the duration and minimal to no side effects with such intervention technologies in stuttering. Finally, the percentage of stuttered syllables (%SS) emerged as the most common outcome measure in technology-based intervention in stuttering. CONCLUSION: A wide variety of technological applications have been implemented in stuttering intervention. Regardless of type, all the studies that aimed to examine the effect of the technological intervention on stuttering reported positive outcomes. This review highlights technology-based stuttering intervention programs’ current status and impact on stuttering dysfluencies. Further, it highlights several advantages and disadvantages of implementing technology-based, and a few directions for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Disability\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-220379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-220379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:近年来,科技取得了令人兴奋的进步。这些进步已在医疗保健环境中实施,以改善治疗结果。在沟通障碍领域,口吃已经见证了各种技术干预措施的实施。本文综述了以技术为基础的口吃干预方案的现状、优缺点以及今后的研究方向。目的:本综述旨在系统地识别用于口吃干预的技术,并探讨这些干预对口吃障碍的影响。方法:按照常规的系统综述流程,使用相关关键词检索6个电子数据库。我们纳入了自1990年以来发表的针对被诊断为发展性口吃的个体的干预研究。此外,所有使用技术干预(如设备、计算机程序和移动电话应用程序)的研究都被包括在内。结果:经过彻底的资格检查,纳入了59项研究。技术康复的主要类别包括远程医疗技术、软件程序、生物反馈、虚拟现实、视频自我建模、神经调节和改变的听觉反馈。总的来说,结果表明技术干预在减少口吃方面有有益的效果。此外,本综述确定了这种干预技术对口吃的持续时间缩短和副作用最小或没有副作用。最后,在以技术为基础的口吃干预中,口吃音节的百分比(%SS)成为最常见的测量结果。结论:在口吃干预中应用了多种技术手段。无论何种类型,所有旨在检验技术干预对口吃的影响的研究都报告了积极的结果。本文综述了以技术为基础的口吃干预方案的现状及其对口吃障碍的影响。进一步指出了实施基于技术的几种优缺点,以及未来研究的几个方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technological interventions in stuttering: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Technology in recent times has shown exciting advancements. These advancements have been implemented in healthcare settings to improve therapeutic outcomes. Within the domain of communication disorders, stuttering has witnessed the implementation of a wide variety of technological interventions. The paper provides a comprehensive review and availability of the current status of technology-based stuttering intervention programs, their advantages and disadvantages, and a few directions for future research. AIM: This review aimed to systematically identify the technologies used in stuttering intervention and explore the effect of these interventions on dysfluencies in stuttering. METHOD: We followed the conventional systematic review process and searched six electronic databases using relevant keywords. We included intervention studies published since 1990 on individuals diagnosed with developmental stuttering. In addition, all studies that used technological intervention such as device(s), computer programs, and mobile phone applications were included. RESULT: Fifty-nine studies were included after a thorough eligibility check. The major categories of technological rehabilitation include telehealth technology, software programs, biofeedback, virtual reality, video-self modeling, neuromodulation, and altered auditory feedback. In general, the results show a beneficial effect of technological intervention in reducing stuttering. Further, this review identifies reduction of the duration and minimal to no side effects with such intervention technologies in stuttering. Finally, the percentage of stuttered syllables (%SS) emerged as the most common outcome measure in technology-based intervention in stuttering. CONCLUSION: A wide variety of technological applications have been implemented in stuttering intervention. Regardless of type, all the studies that aimed to examine the effect of the technological intervention on stuttering reported positive outcomes. This review highlights technology-based stuttering intervention programs’ current status and impact on stuttering dysfluencies. Further, it highlights several advantages and disadvantages of implementing technology-based, and a few directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Disability
Technology and Disability Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Technology and Disability communicates knowledge about the field of assistive technology devices and services, within the context of the lives of end users - persons with disabilities and their family members. While the topics are technical in nature, the articles are written for broad comprehension despite the reader"s education or training. Technology and Disability"s contents cover research and development efforts, education and training programs, service and policy activities and consumer experiences. - The term Technology refers to assistive devices and services. - The term Disability refers to both permanent and temporary functional limitations experienced by people of any age within any circumstance.
期刊最新文献
A study of wheelchair, movement and environmental factors associated with concerns about falls among wheelchairs users Multisensory computer-based system for teaching sentence reading in Hindi and Bangla to children with dyslexia Inaccessibility maps to support sighted people using visually impaired people’s white cane data Design and development of a low-cost device to measure foot parameters in children with disability: A “footmeter” A comparative evaluation of sliding contact tactile systems displaying braille and raised print
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1