{"title":"黄金海岸:城市与建筑","authors":"David Nichols","doi":"10.1080/10331867.2022.2042779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"not addressed. Investigating architects’ homes through any of these other lenses would be another interesting and necessary book. Moreover, the editors recognise that only four of the case studies were the homes of women architects. Reflecting on what is not in Activism at Home helps to identify further issues to explore and threads to untangle by the editors themselves, the contributors, or anybody else building on this body of scholarship. This is a smart, though potentially dangerous, move in that it acknowledges the shortcomings of the project and anticipates where further criticism would focus. Ending the book with a reflection on precisely what is not there, however, can be seen as an homage or testament to what is already there. Doucet and Gosseye seem to consider that this carefully curated collection speaks — in visual and discursive terms — for itself.","PeriodicalId":42105,"journal":{"name":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","volume":"32 1","pages":"166 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gold Coast: City and Architecture\",\"authors\":\"David Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10331867.2022.2042779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"not addressed. Investigating architects’ homes through any of these other lenses would be another interesting and necessary book. Moreover, the editors recognise that only four of the case studies were the homes of women architects. Reflecting on what is not in Activism at Home helps to identify further issues to explore and threads to untangle by the editors themselves, the contributors, or anybody else building on this body of scholarship. This is a smart, though potentially dangerous, move in that it acknowledges the shortcomings of the project and anticipates where further criticism would focus. Ending the book with a reflection on precisely what is not there, however, can be seen as an homage or testament to what is already there. Doucet and Gosseye seem to consider that this carefully curated collection speaks — in visual and discursive terms — for itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"166 - 168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2022.2042779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2022.2042779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
not addressed. Investigating architects’ homes through any of these other lenses would be another interesting and necessary book. Moreover, the editors recognise that only four of the case studies were the homes of women architects. Reflecting on what is not in Activism at Home helps to identify further issues to explore and threads to untangle by the editors themselves, the contributors, or anybody else building on this body of scholarship. This is a smart, though potentially dangerous, move in that it acknowledges the shortcomings of the project and anticipates where further criticism would focus. Ending the book with a reflection on precisely what is not there, however, can be seen as an homage or testament to what is already there. Doucet and Gosseye seem to consider that this carefully curated collection speaks — in visual and discursive terms — for itself.