发展知识公正性,在南非高等教育中实现公正

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Citizenship and Social Justice Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI:10.1177/17461979211048665
S. Kumalo
{"title":"发展知识公正性,在南非高等教育中实现公正","authors":"S. Kumalo","doi":"10.1177/17461979211048665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In South Africa, the scholarship of epistemic justice has taken on an historical gaze with higher education framed as a social institution that might ameliorate the historical traumas of colonialism. Undoing the legacies of colonialism has been framed as the democratisation of the knowledge project. Using the White Paper 3 of 1997 that posits academic freedom, institutional autonomy and public accountability as fundamental to institutional governance, in part I of this analysis I broadened public accountability to include the social, political and economic factors that inhibit or act as catalyst to the attainment of educational desire. In this second part publication, I am interested in developing and proposing epistemic impartiality. This concept is developed from Mitova’s proposition of ‘decolonising knowledge without too much relativism’, which ultimately fosters epistemic justice through rigorously scrutinising each epistemic tradition. My suggestion is that epistemic impartiality enables dialogue between divergent traditions.","PeriodicalId":45472,"journal":{"name":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","volume":"18 1","pages":"85 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing epistemic impartiality to deliver on justice in higher education South Africa\",\"authors\":\"S. Kumalo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17461979211048665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In South Africa, the scholarship of epistemic justice has taken on an historical gaze with higher education framed as a social institution that might ameliorate the historical traumas of colonialism. Undoing the legacies of colonialism has been framed as the democratisation of the knowledge project. Using the White Paper 3 of 1997 that posits academic freedom, institutional autonomy and public accountability as fundamental to institutional governance, in part I of this analysis I broadened public accountability to include the social, political and economic factors that inhibit or act as catalyst to the attainment of educational desire. In this second part publication, I am interested in developing and proposing epistemic impartiality. This concept is developed from Mitova’s proposition of ‘decolonising knowledge without too much relativism’, which ultimately fosters epistemic justice through rigorously scrutinising each epistemic tradition. My suggestion is that epistemic impartiality enables dialogue between divergent traditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Citizenship and Social Justice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Citizenship and Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211048665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211048665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在南非,认识正义的学术受到了历史的关注,高等教育被视为一种可能减轻殖民主义历史创伤的社会制度。摆脱殖民主义的遗产被认为是知识项目的民主化。在本分析的第一部分中,我利用1997年的白皮书3,将学术自由、机构自治和公共问责制视为机构治理的基础,将公共问责制扩大到包括阻碍或促进实现教育愿望的社会、政治和经济因素。在这本第二部分的出版物中,我对发展和提出认识公正感兴趣。这一概念源于米托娃“在没有太多相对主义的情况下将知识非殖民化”的主张,该主张最终通过严格审查每一种认识传统来促进认识正义。我的建议是,认识上的公正性使不同传统之间能够进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing epistemic impartiality to deliver on justice in higher education South Africa
In South Africa, the scholarship of epistemic justice has taken on an historical gaze with higher education framed as a social institution that might ameliorate the historical traumas of colonialism. Undoing the legacies of colonialism has been framed as the democratisation of the knowledge project. Using the White Paper 3 of 1997 that posits academic freedom, institutional autonomy and public accountability as fundamental to institutional governance, in part I of this analysis I broadened public accountability to include the social, political and economic factors that inhibit or act as catalyst to the attainment of educational desire. In this second part publication, I am interested in developing and proposing epistemic impartiality. This concept is developed from Mitova’s proposition of ‘decolonising knowledge without too much relativism’, which ultimately fosters epistemic justice through rigorously scrutinising each epistemic tradition. My suggestion is that epistemic impartiality enables dialogue between divergent traditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Citizenship and Social Justice
Education Citizenship and Social Justice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Destination: Wokeness? Possibilities for exploring domestic educational travel as conscientizing praxis From influencing school food to handling hate speech: Methods, areas, and limitations of active citizenship in Finnish social studies textbooks Discerning risk-takers from avoiders: Which teachers are more likely to support teaching about the violent past in Ambon, Indonesia? Conceptualizing political information literacy among young people: A systematized review of the literature Pedagogies of generosity: Towards a multidimensional understanding that nurtures ‘critical generosity’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1