P-12学校的表演艺术教学艺术家:重新考虑准备,政策和专业挑战

Q1 Arts and Humanities Arts Education Policy Review Pub Date : 2022-02-23 DOI:10.1080/10632913.2022.2041140
J. McNamara, Doug Risner
{"title":"P-12学校的表演艺术教学艺术家:重新考虑准备,政策和专业挑战","authors":"J. McNamara, Doug Risner","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2022.2041140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This afterword gathers central themes from preceding articles in the issue, including the wide range of P-12 teaching artists’ preparation, parity in the field (gender, genre, race, funding, etc.), professional challenges, and potential to reform supporting policies, and brings them into dialogue with one another. It highlights both the tension and the partnership that exist at the intersection of “teacher” and “artist” identities, and suggests that the sites of pedagogical and policy overlap, divergence, and intertwining also invite deeper inquiry, in the best interest of the student and the community within which the student is located. There are questions about and implications for P-12 teaching artist preparation and work, funding structures, school and community investment, and administrative policy.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"127 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performing arts teaching artists in P-12 schools: reconsidering preparation, policy, and professional challenges\",\"authors\":\"J. McNamara, Doug Risner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632913.2022.2041140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This afterword gathers central themes from preceding articles in the issue, including the wide range of P-12 teaching artists’ preparation, parity in the field (gender, genre, race, funding, etc.), professional challenges, and potential to reform supporting policies, and brings them into dialogue with one another. It highlights both the tension and the partnership that exist at the intersection of “teacher” and “artist” identities, and suggests that the sites of pedagogical and policy overlap, divergence, and intertwining also invite deeper inquiry, in the best interest of the student and the community within which the student is located. There are questions about and implications for P-12 teaching artist preparation and work, funding structures, school and community investment, and administrative policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2022.2041140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2022.2041140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇后篇汇集了本期前几篇文章的中心主题,包括广泛的P-12教学艺术家的准备、领域平等(性别、流派、种族、资金等)、专业挑战和改革支持政策的潜力,并使他们彼此对话。它强调了存在于“教师”和“艺术家”身份交汇处的紧张关系和伙伴关系,并表明教学和政策重叠、分歧和交织的地点也邀请更深层次的探究,以学生和学生所在社区的最佳利益。有关于P-12教学艺术家的准备和工作、资金结构、学校和社区投资以及行政政策的问题和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performing arts teaching artists in P-12 schools: reconsidering preparation, policy, and professional challenges
Abstract This afterword gathers central themes from preceding articles in the issue, including the wide range of P-12 teaching artists’ preparation, parity in the field (gender, genre, race, funding, etc.), professional challenges, and potential to reform supporting policies, and brings them into dialogue with one another. It highlights both the tension and the partnership that exist at the intersection of “teacher” and “artist” identities, and suggests that the sites of pedagogical and policy overlap, divergence, and intertwining also invite deeper inquiry, in the best interest of the student and the community within which the student is located. There are questions about and implications for P-12 teaching artist preparation and work, funding structures, school and community investment, and administrative policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arts Education Policy Review
Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Recruit, retain, repair: Toward diversity in the North Carolina Music Educators Association The beat goes on? The current presence of music education in Australian public universities Who’s the best? Investigating the NAMM Foundation’s “Best Communities of Music Education” awardees Strengthening music teacher professional development: the P–12 music administrator’s role Arts education in Hong Kong kindergartens: provision of activities and impact of teachers’ demographics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1