中老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者股骨近端解剖参数的性别和年龄差异

Gaoxiang Xu, Liu Jiantao, Hao Zhang, Licheng Zhang, P. Tang
{"title":"中老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者股骨近端解剖参数的性别和年龄差异","authors":"Gaoxiang Xu, Liu Jiantao, Hao Zhang, Licheng Zhang, P. Tang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190924-00322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo determine the gender and age differences in anatomical parameters of proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture so as to provide theoretical evidence for development of internal fixation devices. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical and CT data of 375 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were analyzed retrospectively who had been treated at Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA from September 2009 to March 2017. The patients were divided into 4 age groups. The middle-aged group (from 45 to 59 years old) had 22 cases, 16 males and 6 females; the early elderly group (from 60 to 74 years old) had 87 cases, 37 males and 50 females; the elderly group (from 75 to 89 years old) had 238 cases, 76 males and 162 females; the late elderly group (≥90 years old) had 28 cases, 6 males and 22 females. The anteversion angle of femoral neck, femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral head diameter, femoral neck length, femoral neck offset and femoral neck width were measured on their images. The anatomical parameters of proximal femur were compared between genders in the same age group and between groups of the same gender. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no significant differences between male and female patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture in body mass index or AO classification, showing comparability(P>0.05). The anteversion angle of femoral neck (8.33°±5.00°) of the male middle-aged and elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture was significantly smaller than that of the female ones (11.28°±6.15°), but their femoral head diameter, femoral neck length, femoral neck offset and femoral neck width (49.10 mm±2.48 mm, 99.70 mm±5.22 mm, 7.18 mm±2.20 mm and 39.10 mm±4.92 mm) were significantly larger than those of the female ones (43.46 mm±2.79 mm, 90.00 mm ± 4.75 mm, 6.29 mm±2.07 mm and 33.49 mm±4.87 mm) (all P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nCompared with the middle-aged and elderly male patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture, the middle-aged and elderly female ones have a larger anteversion angle of femoral neck, smaller offset, width and length of femoral neck, and a smaller femoral head diameter. There are no significant age differences in anatomical parameters of the proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture. \n \n \nKey words: \nHip fractures; Femur; Clinical anatomy; Gender; Imaging, three-dimensional","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"224-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender and age differences in anatomical parameters of proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture\",\"authors\":\"Gaoxiang Xu, Liu Jiantao, Hao Zhang, Licheng Zhang, P. Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190924-00322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo determine the gender and age differences in anatomical parameters of proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture so as to provide theoretical evidence for development of internal fixation devices. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe clinical and CT data of 375 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were analyzed retrospectively who had been treated at Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA from September 2009 to March 2017. The patients were divided into 4 age groups. The middle-aged group (from 45 to 59 years old) had 22 cases, 16 males and 6 females; the early elderly group (from 60 to 74 years old) had 87 cases, 37 males and 50 females; the elderly group (from 75 to 89 years old) had 238 cases, 76 males and 162 females; the late elderly group (≥90 years old) had 28 cases, 6 males and 22 females. The anteversion angle of femoral neck, femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral head diameter, femoral neck length, femoral neck offset and femoral neck width were measured on their images. The anatomical parameters of proximal femur were compared between genders in the same age group and between groups of the same gender. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were no significant differences between male and female patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture in body mass index or AO classification, showing comparability(P>0.05). The anteversion angle of femoral neck (8.33°±5.00°) of the male middle-aged and elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture was significantly smaller than that of the female ones (11.28°±6.15°), but their femoral head diameter, femoral neck length, femoral neck offset and femoral neck width (49.10 mm±2.48 mm, 99.70 mm±5.22 mm, 7.18 mm±2.20 mm and 39.10 mm±4.92 mm) were significantly larger than those of the female ones (43.46 mm±2.79 mm, 90.00 mm ± 4.75 mm, 6.29 mm±2.07 mm and 33.49 mm±4.87 mm) (all P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nCompared with the middle-aged and elderly male patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture, the middle-aged and elderly female ones have a larger anteversion angle of femoral neck, smaller offset, width and length of femoral neck, and a smaller femoral head diameter. There are no significant age differences in anatomical parameters of the proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nHip fractures; Femur; Clinical anatomy; Gender; Imaging, three-dimensional\",\"PeriodicalId\":10145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"224-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190924-00322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190924-00322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解中老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者股骨近端解剖参数的性别和年龄差异,为内固定装置的研制提供理论依据。方法回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医疗中心骨科2009年9月至2017年3月收治的375例股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床及CT资料。患者分为4个年龄组。中年组(45 ~ 59岁)22例,男16例,女6例;早老年组(60 ~ 74岁)87例,男37例,女50例;老年组(75 ~ 89岁)238例,男76例,女162例;老年晚期组(≥90岁)28例,男6例,女22例。测量股骨颈前倾角、股骨颈轴角、股骨头直径、股骨颈长度、股骨颈偏移量和股骨颈宽度。比较同年龄组和同性别组间股骨近端解剖参数。结果股骨粗隆间骨折患者的体重指数及AO分型在男女间无显著差异,具有可比性(P < 0.05)。男性中老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者股骨颈前倾角(8.33°±5.00°)明显小于女性患者(11.28°±6.15°),但其股骨头直径、股骨颈长度、股骨颈偏移量和股骨颈宽度(49.10 mm±2.48 mm、99.70 mm±5.22 mm、7.18 mm±2.20 mm和39.10 mm±4.92 mm)明显大于女性患者(43.46 mm±2.79 mm、90.00 mm±4.75 mm、(6.29 mm±2.07 mm)和(33.49 mm±4.87 mm) (P均0.05)。结论与中老年男性股骨粗隆间骨折患者相比,中老年女性股骨颈前倾角较大,股骨颈偏移量、宽度和长度较小,股骨头直径较小。中老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者股骨近端解剖参数无明显年龄差异。关键词:髋部骨折;股骨;临床解剖学;性别;成像、三维
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender and age differences in anatomical parameters of proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture
Objective To determine the gender and age differences in anatomical parameters of proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture so as to provide theoretical evidence for development of internal fixation devices. Methods The clinical and CT data of 375 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were analyzed retrospectively who had been treated at Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA from September 2009 to March 2017. The patients were divided into 4 age groups. The middle-aged group (from 45 to 59 years old) had 22 cases, 16 males and 6 females; the early elderly group (from 60 to 74 years old) had 87 cases, 37 males and 50 females; the elderly group (from 75 to 89 years old) had 238 cases, 76 males and 162 females; the late elderly group (≥90 years old) had 28 cases, 6 males and 22 females. The anteversion angle of femoral neck, femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral head diameter, femoral neck length, femoral neck offset and femoral neck width were measured on their images. The anatomical parameters of proximal femur were compared between genders in the same age group and between groups of the same gender. Results There were no significant differences between male and female patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture in body mass index or AO classification, showing comparability(P>0.05). The anteversion angle of femoral neck (8.33°±5.00°) of the male middle-aged and elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture was significantly smaller than that of the female ones (11.28°±6.15°), but their femoral head diameter, femoral neck length, femoral neck offset and femoral neck width (49.10 mm±2.48 mm, 99.70 mm±5.22 mm, 7.18 mm±2.20 mm and 39.10 mm±4.92 mm) were significantly larger than those of the female ones (43.46 mm±2.79 mm, 90.00 mm ± 4.75 mm, 6.29 mm±2.07 mm and 33.49 mm±4.87 mm) (all P 0.05). Conclusions Compared with the middle-aged and elderly male patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture, the middle-aged and elderly female ones have a larger anteversion angle of femoral neck, smaller offset, width and length of femoral neck, and a smaller femoral head diameter. There are no significant age differences in anatomical parameters of the proximal femur in middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Key words: Hip fractures; Femur; Clinical anatomy; Gender; Imaging, three-dimensional
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7288
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Emergent foot and ankle surgery in the epidemic of COVID-19 Procedures and strategies for sterilization and management of surgical instruments for patients with orthopaedic trauma during COVID-19 epidemic Bone cement-enhanced proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of severe osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture Current and future management of hip fracture in the elderly Intercondylar ridge fracture: broad and narrow definitions and their clinical significance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1