民事论文中的比较法

O. Kuznetsova
{"title":"民事论文中的比较法","authors":"O. Kuznetsova","doi":"10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"dialectical and formal logics were used, especially methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison, as well as the juridical dogmatic method of cognition. Results: on the basis of approaches, principles and rules developed by the doctrine of comparison, a “roadmap” was defined for using the comparative legal method in thesis works: formulation of purpose of addressing the foreign experience of legal regulation; choosing the legal system for comparison; understanding the contents of the foreign law norms; discovering similarities and differences in legal regulation; comments, critical examination and execution of the results obtained from comparison.","PeriodicalId":33643,"journal":{"name":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE LEGAL METHOD IN CIVIL THESES\",\"authors\":\"O. Kuznetsova\",\"doi\":\"10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"dialectical and formal logics were used, especially methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison, as well as the juridical dogmatic method of cognition. Results: on the basis of approaches, principles and rules developed by the doctrine of comparison, a “roadmap” was defined for using the comparative legal method in thesis works: formulation of purpose of addressing the foreign experience of legal regulation; choosing the legal system for comparison; understanding the contents of the foreign law norms; discovering similarities and differences in legal regulation; comments, critical examination and execution of the results obtained from comparison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

运用了辩证逻辑和形式逻辑,特别是分析、综合和比较的方法,以及司法的教条主义的认识方法。结果:在比较法理论发展的方法、原则和规则的基础上,确定了论文运用比较法方法的“路线图”:阐述论述国外法律规制经验的目的;选择比较的法律制度;了解外国法律规范的内容;发现法律规制的异同;评论、批判性审查和执行从比较中获得的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE LEGAL METHOD IN CIVIL THESES
dialectical and formal logics were used, especially methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison, as well as the juridical dogmatic method of cognition. Results: on the basis of approaches, principles and rules developed by the doctrine of comparison, a “roadmap” was defined for using the comparative legal method in thesis works: formulation of purpose of addressing the foreign experience of legal regulation; choosing the legal system for comparison; understanding the contents of the foreign law norms; discovering similarities and differences in legal regulation; comments, critical examination and execution of the results obtained from comparison.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
LEGAL MODELING AS A METHOD OF CIVIL RESEARCH ON THE METHODOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF THE THEORY OF SYSTEMIC ORGANIZATION OF INTERSECTORAL RELATIONS OF CIVIL LAW: TO THE ANNIVERSARY OF M.IU. CHELYSHEV PHILOSOPHICAL BATTLE AGAINST MORAL HAZARD: DO WE NEED LAW METHODOLOGY CHANGE FROM “ALL OR NOTHING PRINCIPLE” TO “PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY”? THE CONCEPT OF GOOD GOVERNANCE IN THE EU LEGISLATION: ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF METHODOLOGY OF THE CIVIL LAW RESEARCH ADDITIONAL CONCLUSION ON A DISSERTATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1