未知后果的伦理学:布拉茨拉夫的《Sefer Ha‐Middot》拉比Nahman

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1111/jore.12408
Shaul Magid
{"title":"未知后果的伦理学:布拉茨拉夫的《Sefer Ha‐Middot》拉比Nahman","authors":"Shaul Magid","doi":"10.1111/jore.12408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This essay is a close examination of one of Nahman of Bratslav's early and largely unexamined texts, <i>Sefer ha-Middot</i>. The question it addresses is whether one can call this a study of “ethics” or, in Jewish nomenclature, <i>musar</i>, a work that seeks to cultivate human behaviors and describe ethical formation. In addition, it asks whether <i>Sefer ha-Middot</i> can be called a text of “virtue ethics” given its focus on virtues and their enactment. The essay argues that Nahman's peculiar metaphysical notion that all mitzvot are inextricably intertwined prevents any analysis of behavioral causality severing his “ethics” from any Aristotelian or Kantian tradition and brings him closer to Alasdair MacIntyre's notion of ethics as tied to traditional norms. And even with MacIntyre, the comparison is quite limited. Discussing “faith,” the “<i>zaddik</i>,” and “money,” the essay explores Nahman's view of how these and other virtues are cultivated and achieved.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Ethics of Unseen Consequences: Rabbi Nahman of Bratslav's Sefer Ha-Middot\",\"authors\":\"Shaul Magid\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jore.12408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This essay is a close examination of one of Nahman of Bratslav's early and largely unexamined texts, <i>Sefer ha-Middot</i>. The question it addresses is whether one can call this a study of “ethics” or, in Jewish nomenclature, <i>musar</i>, a work that seeks to cultivate human behaviors and describe ethical formation. In addition, it asks whether <i>Sefer ha-Middot</i> can be called a text of “virtue ethics” given its focus on virtues and their enactment. The essay argues that Nahman's peculiar metaphysical notion that all mitzvot are inextricably intertwined prevents any analysis of behavioral causality severing his “ethics” from any Aristotelian or Kantian tradition and brings him closer to Alasdair MacIntyre's notion of ethics as tied to traditional norms. And even with MacIntyre, the comparison is quite limited. Discussing “faith,” the “<i>zaddik</i>,” and “money,” the essay explores Nahman's view of how these and other virtues are cultivated and achieved.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.12408\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.12408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对布拉茨斯拉夫的纳曼早期和大部分未经研究的文本之一《塞弗哈-米多》的仔细研究。它提出的问题是,人们是否可以将其称为“伦理学”的研究,或者用犹太人的术语来说,是一项旨在培养人类行为和描述道德形成的工作。此外,鉴于《西游记》对美德及其制定的关注,它是否可以被称为“美德伦理学”的文本。这篇文章认为,纳曼独特的形而上学观点认为,所有的mitzvot都是不可避免地交织在一起的,这阻止了对行为因果关系的任何分析,使他的“伦理学”与任何亚里士多德或康德的传统相分离,并使他更接近阿拉斯代尔·麦金泰尔(Alasdair MacIntyre)与传统规范相联系的伦理学概念。即使是麦金太尔,这种比较也相当有限。这篇文章讨论了“信仰”、“扎迪克”和“金钱”,探讨了纳曼对如何培养和实现这些美德和其他美德的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Ethics of Unseen Consequences: Rabbi Nahman of Bratslav's Sefer Ha-Middot

This essay is a close examination of one of Nahman of Bratslav's early and largely unexamined texts, Sefer ha-Middot. The question it addresses is whether one can call this a study of “ethics” or, in Jewish nomenclature, musar, a work that seeks to cultivate human behaviors and describe ethical formation. In addition, it asks whether Sefer ha-Middot can be called a text of “virtue ethics” given its focus on virtues and their enactment. The essay argues that Nahman's peculiar metaphysical notion that all mitzvot are inextricably intertwined prevents any analysis of behavioral causality severing his “ethics” from any Aristotelian or Kantian tradition and brings him closer to Alasdair MacIntyre's notion of ethics as tied to traditional norms. And even with MacIntyre, the comparison is quite limited. Discussing “faith,” the “zaddik,” and “money,” the essay explores Nahman's view of how these and other virtues are cultivated and achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Religion, Race, and the Limit of Ethics: Historical Considerations A Daoist Critique of Effort in Pierre Hadot's Philosophy Animism, Eco-Immanence, and Divine Transcendence: Toward an Integrated Religious Framework for Environmental Ethics Kierkegaard, Social Media, and Despair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1