COVID-19期间疼痛患者远程医疗利用的差异

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pain Reports Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001001
Bridget R. Mueller, Steven Lawrence, E. Benn, Sharon Nirenberg, Benjamin Kummer, N. Jetté, M. George, J. Robinson-Papp
{"title":"COVID-19期间疼痛患者远程医疗利用的差异","authors":"Bridget R. Mueller, Steven Lawrence, E. Benn, Sharon Nirenberg, Benjamin Kummer, N. Jetté, M. George, J. Robinson-Papp","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. For patients living with pain in New York City during the first wave of COVID-19, the relationship between sociodemographic factors and telehealth utilization evolved with time. Introduction: The shift from in-person visits to telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges for patients with pain. Disparities in health care access already existed, and the impact of telehealth on these inequities has not been studied. Objectives: To identify sociodemographic characteristics of patients with pain obtaining care through video, telephone, and in-person visits as social distancing restrictions evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using our institutional clinical data warehouse, we identified 3314 patients with pain receiving care at a large academic institution in New York City during a baseline period (September 23, 2019–March 22, 2020) and counted telephone, video, and in-person visits during the following conditions: a shutdown period (March 23, 2020–May 23, 2020), when nonessential in-person visits were strictly limited, and a reopening period (May 23, 2020–September 23, 2020), when restrictions were relaxed and in-person visits were available. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the technology used to complete a visit: (1) video, (2) telephone, (3) in-person, and (4) no visit. Results: Patients who were older, publicly insured, and identified as Black or Hispanic were overrepresented in the telephone visit group during shutdown and the in-person group during reopening. A video visit during shutdown increased the likelihood of continued video visit use during reopening despite the return of in-person visits. Conclusions: Results show differences in how patients with pain accessed clinical care in a socially distanced world and that flexibility in method of health care delivery may reduce barriers to access. Future research will identify factors (eg, Internet access, digital literacy, provider–patient relationships) driving heterogeneity in telehealth use in patients with pain.","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in telehealth utilization in patients with pain during COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Bridget R. Mueller, Steven Lawrence, E. Benn, Sharon Nirenberg, Benjamin Kummer, N. Jetté, M. George, J. Robinson-Papp\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. For patients living with pain in New York City during the first wave of COVID-19, the relationship between sociodemographic factors and telehealth utilization evolved with time. Introduction: The shift from in-person visits to telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges for patients with pain. Disparities in health care access already existed, and the impact of telehealth on these inequities has not been studied. Objectives: To identify sociodemographic characteristics of patients with pain obtaining care through video, telephone, and in-person visits as social distancing restrictions evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using our institutional clinical data warehouse, we identified 3314 patients with pain receiving care at a large academic institution in New York City during a baseline period (September 23, 2019–March 22, 2020) and counted telephone, video, and in-person visits during the following conditions: a shutdown period (March 23, 2020–May 23, 2020), when nonessential in-person visits were strictly limited, and a reopening period (May 23, 2020–September 23, 2020), when restrictions were relaxed and in-person visits were available. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the technology used to complete a visit: (1) video, (2) telephone, (3) in-person, and (4) no visit. Results: Patients who were older, publicly insured, and identified as Black or Hispanic were overrepresented in the telephone visit group during shutdown and the in-person group during reopening. A video visit during shutdown increased the likelihood of continued video visit use during reopening despite the return of in-person visits. Conclusions: Results show differences in how patients with pain accessed clinical care in a socially distanced world and that flexibility in method of health care delivery may reduce barriers to access. Future research will identify factors (eg, Internet access, digital literacy, provider–patient relationships) driving heterogeneity in telehealth use in patients with pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

文本中提供了补充数字内容。对于第一波新冠肺炎期间纽约市的疼痛患者来说,社会人口统计学因素与远程医疗利用之间的关系随着时间的推移而演变。简介:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,从住院就诊到远程医疗就诊的转变给疼痛患者带来了独特的挑战。在获得医疗保健方面已经存在差异,远程医疗对这些不平等的影响尚未得到研究。目的:随着新冠肺炎大流行期间社交距离限制的演变,识别疼痛患者通过视频、电话和住院就诊获得护理的社会人口学特征。方法:使用我们的机构临床数据仓库,我们确定了3314名在基线期(2019年9月23日至2020年3月22日)在纽约市一家大型学术机构接受治疗的疼痛患者,并统计了以下情况下的电话、视频和面对面访视:停工期,非必要的亲自访问受到严格限制,以及重新开放期间(2020年5月23日至2020年9月23日),放松限制,可以亲自访问。根据用于完成就诊的技术,患者被分为4组:(1)视频、(2)电话、(3)面对面和(4)不就诊。结果:在关闭期间,电话就诊组和重新开放期间,年龄较大、有公共保险、被认定为黑人或西班牙裔的患者比例过高。关闭期间的视频访问增加了在重新开放期间继续使用视频访问的可能性,尽管恢复了亲自访问。结论:研究结果表明,在一个社交距离较远的世界里,疼痛患者获得临床护理的方式存在差异,医疗服务提供方法的灵活性可能会减少获得医疗服务的障碍。未来的研究将确定导致疼痛患者远程医疗使用异质性的因素(如互联网接入、数字素养、提供者-患者关系)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in telehealth utilization in patients with pain during COVID-19
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. For patients living with pain in New York City during the first wave of COVID-19, the relationship between sociodemographic factors and telehealth utilization evolved with time. Introduction: The shift from in-person visits to telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges for patients with pain. Disparities in health care access already existed, and the impact of telehealth on these inequities has not been studied. Objectives: To identify sociodemographic characteristics of patients with pain obtaining care through video, telephone, and in-person visits as social distancing restrictions evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using our institutional clinical data warehouse, we identified 3314 patients with pain receiving care at a large academic institution in New York City during a baseline period (September 23, 2019–March 22, 2020) and counted telephone, video, and in-person visits during the following conditions: a shutdown period (March 23, 2020–May 23, 2020), when nonessential in-person visits were strictly limited, and a reopening period (May 23, 2020–September 23, 2020), when restrictions were relaxed and in-person visits were available. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the technology used to complete a visit: (1) video, (2) telephone, (3) in-person, and (4) no visit. Results: Patients who were older, publicly insured, and identified as Black or Hispanic were overrepresented in the telephone visit group during shutdown and the in-person group during reopening. A video visit during shutdown increased the likelihood of continued video visit use during reopening despite the return of in-person visits. Conclusions: Results show differences in how patients with pain accessed clinical care in a socially distanced world and that flexibility in method of health care delivery may reduce barriers to access. Future research will identify factors (eg, Internet access, digital literacy, provider–patient relationships) driving heterogeneity in telehealth use in patients with pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bone metabolism in complex regional pain syndrome. Differences in multidimensional phenotype of 2 joint pain models link early weight-bearing deficit to late depressive-like behavior in male mice. Dry needling for orofacial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Incidence and treatment of complex regional pain syndrome after surgery: analysis of claims data from Germany. Pregabalin produces analgesia in males but not females in an animal model of chronic widespread muscle pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1