{"title":"台湾恢复性司法的解耻与儒家关系论","authors":"Reynol Hsueh-Hung Cheng, Meredith Rossner","doi":"10.1007/s11417-022-09392-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>While Braithwaite’s Reintegrative Shaming Theory is the basis of restorative justice policy in Taiwan, little research has been conducted to understand how the theory and its rationale are integrated into restorative practice in Taiwanese juvenile justice. The unique political and cultural context Taiwan, including its embrace of Confucian relationalism, presents an opportunity to refine our understanding of how shame may operate in restorative justice encounters. Based on a review of restorative justice programmes in Taiwanese juvenile justice, governmental documents, and academic scholarship, this paper will explore the work of shame in Taiwanese restorative justice, focusing on the unique characteristics of shaming in the context of Confucian relationalism. We then propose a framework that links shame, relationalism, and transformation, which can help understand the practice of restorative justice within Taiwanese juvenile justice. This framework can be beneficial to the future development of restorative justice theory and practice in Confucian relationalistic societies and beyond.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":45526,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Criminology","volume":"18 2","pages":"209 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking Shame and Confucian Relationalism in Taiwanese Restorative Justice\",\"authors\":\"Reynol Hsueh-Hung Cheng, Meredith Rossner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11417-022-09392-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h2>Abstract\\n</h2><div><p>While Braithwaite’s Reintegrative Shaming Theory is the basis of restorative justice policy in Taiwan, little research has been conducted to understand how the theory and its rationale are integrated into restorative practice in Taiwanese juvenile justice. The unique political and cultural context Taiwan, including its embrace of Confucian relationalism, presents an opportunity to refine our understanding of how shame may operate in restorative justice encounters. Based on a review of restorative justice programmes in Taiwanese juvenile justice, governmental documents, and academic scholarship, this paper will explore the work of shame in Taiwanese restorative justice, focusing on the unique characteristics of shaming in the context of Confucian relationalism. We then propose a framework that links shame, relationalism, and transformation, which can help understand the practice of restorative justice within Taiwanese juvenile justice. This framework can be beneficial to the future development of restorative justice theory and practice in Confucian relationalistic societies and beyond.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"209 - 230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-022-09392-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-022-09392-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unpacking Shame and Confucian Relationalism in Taiwanese Restorative Justice
Abstract
While Braithwaite’s Reintegrative Shaming Theory is the basis of restorative justice policy in Taiwan, little research has been conducted to understand how the theory and its rationale are integrated into restorative practice in Taiwanese juvenile justice. The unique political and cultural context Taiwan, including its embrace of Confucian relationalism, presents an opportunity to refine our understanding of how shame may operate in restorative justice encounters. Based on a review of restorative justice programmes in Taiwanese juvenile justice, governmental documents, and academic scholarship, this paper will explore the work of shame in Taiwanese restorative justice, focusing on the unique characteristics of shaming in the context of Confucian relationalism. We then propose a framework that links shame, relationalism, and transformation, which can help understand the practice of restorative justice within Taiwanese juvenile justice. This framework can be beneficial to the future development of restorative justice theory and practice in Confucian relationalistic societies and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Electronic submission now possible! Please see the Instructions for Authors. For general information about this new journal please contact the publisher at [welmoed.spahr@springer.com] The Asian Journal of Criminology aims to advance the study of criminology and criminal justice in Asia, to promote evidence-based public policy in crime prevention, and to promote comparative studies about crime and criminal justice. The Journal provides a platform for criminologists, policymakers, and practitioners and welcomes manuscripts relating to crime, crime prevention, criminal law, medico-legal topics and the administration of criminal justice in Asian countries. The Journal especially encourages theoretical and methodological papers with an emphasis on evidence-based, empirical research addressing crime in Asian contexts. It seeks to publish research arising from a broad variety of methodological traditions, including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and comparative methods. The Journal fosters a multi-disciplinary focus and welcomes manuscripts from a variety of disciplines, including criminology, criminal justice, law, sociology, psychology, forensic science, social work, urban studies, history, and geography.