SURAKARTA传统市场的空间多样性和分布是改善空间管理的潜在因素

I. Aliyah, B. Setioko, W. Pradoto
{"title":"SURAKARTA传统市场的空间多样性和分布是改善空间管理的潜在因素","authors":"I. Aliyah, B. Setioko, W. Pradoto","doi":"10.14710/GEOPLANNING.4.1.63-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional markets function as trading place, socio-culture interaction, and recreation facility either in regional or urban scope. Distribution and variety of spatial condition influence traditional markets’ planning both physically and non-physically. Therefore, this research aimed to conduct a mapping of traditional markets’ spatial distribution and variety as potential factors to improve spatial-based management. Analysis methods including: (1) Mapping by employing Geographic Information System, (2) Category Based Analysis (CBA), and (3) Interactive Analysis were applied in Surakarta City as the research location. The result of this research signifies that spatial variety and distribution of traditional markets in Surakarta had similar pattern between one market to others; overlapping service function; specific commodity types in accordance with the market’s characteristics; diverse operating hours. Spatial variety and distribution could be potential factors to improve traditional market management as shopping service. This result was contrasted with Central Place Theory by Christaller and NAEss & Jensen’s research finding stating that distance became a key factor influencing accessibility to a number of activity facilities. Therefore, distance toward the service center is not considered as the main factor in traditional market management. The main factor in managing and controlling traditional markets’ development includes service function, commodity specification, and operating hour’s flexibility.","PeriodicalId":30789,"journal":{"name":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.4.1.63-74","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPATIAL VARIETY AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRADITIONAL MARKETS IN SURAKARTA AS POTENTIAL FACTORS IN IMPROVING SPATIAL-BASED MANAGEMENT\",\"authors\":\"I. Aliyah, B. Setioko, W. Pradoto\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/GEOPLANNING.4.1.63-74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional markets function as trading place, socio-culture interaction, and recreation facility either in regional or urban scope. Distribution and variety of spatial condition influence traditional markets’ planning both physically and non-physically. Therefore, this research aimed to conduct a mapping of traditional markets’ spatial distribution and variety as potential factors to improve spatial-based management. Analysis methods including: (1) Mapping by employing Geographic Information System, (2) Category Based Analysis (CBA), and (3) Interactive Analysis were applied in Surakarta City as the research location. The result of this research signifies that spatial variety and distribution of traditional markets in Surakarta had similar pattern between one market to others; overlapping service function; specific commodity types in accordance with the market’s characteristics; diverse operating hours. Spatial variety and distribution could be potential factors to improve traditional market management as shopping service. This result was contrasted with Central Place Theory by Christaller and NAEss & Jensen’s research finding stating that distance became a key factor influencing accessibility to a number of activity facilities. Therefore, distance toward the service center is not considered as the main factor in traditional market management. The main factor in managing and controlling traditional markets’ development includes service function, commodity specification, and operating hour’s flexibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.4.1.63-74\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.4.1.63-74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.4.1.63-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

传统市场在区域或城市范围内起着交易场所、社会文化互动和娱乐设施的作用。空间条件的分布和变化对传统市场的规划产生了物理和非物理的影响。因此,本研究旨在对传统市场的空间分布和多样性作为潜在因素进行映射,以改进基于空间的管理。分析方法包括:(1)利用地理信息系统绘制地图;(2)基于类别的分析(CBA);(3)交互分析。研究结果表明,苏拉卡塔传统市场的空间多样性和分布在一个市场和另一个市场之间具有相似的模式;服务功能重叠;符合市场特点的特定商品类型;不同的运行时间。空间多样性和分布可能是改善传统市场管理作为购物服务的潜在因素。这一结果与Christaller和NAEss&Jensen的中心位置理论进行了对比,后者的研究发现距离成为影响许多活动设施可达性的关键因素。因此,在传统的市场管理中,离服务中心的距离并不是主要因素。管理和控制传统市场发展的主要因素包括服务功能、商品规格和营业时间的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPATIAL VARIETY AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRADITIONAL MARKETS IN SURAKARTA AS POTENTIAL FACTORS IN IMPROVING SPATIAL-BASED MANAGEMENT
Traditional markets function as trading place, socio-culture interaction, and recreation facility either in regional or urban scope. Distribution and variety of spatial condition influence traditional markets’ planning both physically and non-physically. Therefore, this research aimed to conduct a mapping of traditional markets’ spatial distribution and variety as potential factors to improve spatial-based management. Analysis methods including: (1) Mapping by employing Geographic Information System, (2) Category Based Analysis (CBA), and (3) Interactive Analysis were applied in Surakarta City as the research location. The result of this research signifies that spatial variety and distribution of traditional markets in Surakarta had similar pattern between one market to others; overlapping service function; specific commodity types in accordance with the market’s characteristics; diverse operating hours. Spatial variety and distribution could be potential factors to improve traditional market management as shopping service. This result was contrasted with Central Place Theory by Christaller and NAEss & Jensen’s research finding stating that distance became a key factor influencing accessibility to a number of activity facilities. Therefore, distance toward the service center is not considered as the main factor in traditional market management. The main factor in managing and controlling traditional markets’ development includes service function, commodity specification, and operating hour’s flexibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Application of Cellular Automata (CA) and Markov Chain (MC) Model in Urban Growth Prediction: A case of Surat City, Gujarat, India The Effects of Green Open Spaces on Microclimate and Thermal Comfort in Three Integrated Campus in Yogyakarta, Indonesia Assessing Vulnerability of Agriculture to Drought in East Java, Indonesia: Application of GIS and AHP Impact Deforestation on Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study Highland Kundasang, Sabah Shoreline Dynamics in the Very Small Islands of Karimunjawa – Indonesia: A Preliminary Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1