编辑器的介绍

Q3 Arts and Humanities Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2017-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538
M. Balzer
{"title":"编辑器的介绍","authors":"M. Balzer","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The once-bright lines drawn between “animals” and “humans” have become fuzzier in the “Age of the Anthropocene.” Many social scientists are probing the implications of an increased realization that humans can be destructive animals, and that we influence our interconnected environment more than was commonly considered as recently as twenty years ago. Rather than tackle religiously infused debates about evolution and climate change, this issue explores the question of “animal-human interrelationships” from the viewpoints of various peoples of Eurasia. Living in close proximity with animals has given many individuals and groups different perspectives on animal husbandry, domestication, hunting, and the interconnectedness of all beings seen to have souls within a larger cosmos. This double issue, which I have been working on for over two years, is divided into two loosely related conceptual sections. The first features pragmatic, economic-based animal-human practices, and the second includes more spiritual, cosmological understandings of animals as actors in seen and unseen environments. We begin with well-grounded, ethnographic descriptions and analyses of reindeer herding among the Evenki of Siberia, dog breeding among the Oroks of Sakhalin, livestock husbandry among mountain Kyrgyz nomads, and horse breeding in Turkmenistan. These Siberian and Central Asian cases have something in common: they reveal historical contexts for the degradation of animal husbandry without its Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, vol. 56, nos. 1–2, 2017, pp. 1–5. © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1959 (print)/ISSN 1558-092X (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor’s Introduction\",\"authors\":\"M. Balzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The once-bright lines drawn between “animals” and “humans” have become fuzzier in the “Age of the Anthropocene.” Many social scientists are probing the implications of an increased realization that humans can be destructive animals, and that we influence our interconnected environment more than was commonly considered as recently as twenty years ago. Rather than tackle religiously infused debates about evolution and climate change, this issue explores the question of “animal-human interrelationships” from the viewpoints of various peoples of Eurasia. Living in close proximity with animals has given many individuals and groups different perspectives on animal husbandry, domestication, hunting, and the interconnectedness of all beings seen to have souls within a larger cosmos. This double issue, which I have been working on for over two years, is divided into two loosely related conceptual sections. The first features pragmatic, economic-based animal-human practices, and the second includes more spiritual, cosmological understandings of animals as actors in seen and unseen environments. We begin with well-grounded, ethnographic descriptions and analyses of reindeer herding among the Evenki of Siberia, dog breeding among the Oroks of Sakhalin, livestock husbandry among mountain Kyrgyz nomads, and horse breeding in Turkmenistan. These Siberian and Central Asian cases have something in common: they reveal historical contexts for the degradation of animal husbandry without its Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, vol. 56, nos. 1–2, 2017, pp. 1–5. © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1959 (print)/ISSN 1558-092X (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538\",\"PeriodicalId\":35495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在“人类世时代”,“动物”和“人类”之间曾经清晰的界限变得更加模糊。许多社会科学家正在探索人类可能是破坏性动物的日益认识的含义,以及我们对相互关联的环境的影响比20年前普遍认为的要大。这一问题没有涉及关于进化和气候变化的宗教辩论,而是从欧亚大陆各国人民的角度探讨了“动物与人类的相互关系”问题。与动物生活在一起,让许多个人和群体对畜牧业、驯化、狩猎以及在更大的宇宙中拥有灵魂的所有生物的相互联系有了不同的看法。这个双重问题,我已经研究了两年多,分为两个松散相关的概念部分。第一个特点是务实的、基于经济的动物-人类实践,第二个包括对动物作为看得见和看不见的环境中的行动者的更多精神和宇宙学理解。我们首先对西伯利亚埃文基人的驯鹿放牧、萨哈林奥罗克人的狗饲养、吉尔吉斯斯坦山地游牧民族的畜牧业以及土库曼斯坦的马饲养进行了有根据的民族志描述和分析。这些西伯利亚和中亚的案例有一些共同点:它们揭示了畜牧业退化的历史背景,而没有《欧亚人类学与考古学》,第56卷,2017年第1-2期,第1-5页。©2017 Taylor&Francis Group,LLC ISSN:1061-1959(印刷版)/ISN 1558-092X(在线版)DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editor’s Introduction
The once-bright lines drawn between “animals” and “humans” have become fuzzier in the “Age of the Anthropocene.” Many social scientists are probing the implications of an increased realization that humans can be destructive animals, and that we influence our interconnected environment more than was commonly considered as recently as twenty years ago. Rather than tackle religiously infused debates about evolution and climate change, this issue explores the question of “animal-human interrelationships” from the viewpoints of various peoples of Eurasia. Living in close proximity with animals has given many individuals and groups different perspectives on animal husbandry, domestication, hunting, and the interconnectedness of all beings seen to have souls within a larger cosmos. This double issue, which I have been working on for over two years, is divided into two loosely related conceptual sections. The first features pragmatic, economic-based animal-human practices, and the second includes more spiritual, cosmological understandings of animals as actors in seen and unseen environments. We begin with well-grounded, ethnographic descriptions and analyses of reindeer herding among the Evenki of Siberia, dog breeding among the Oroks of Sakhalin, livestock husbandry among mountain Kyrgyz nomads, and horse breeding in Turkmenistan. These Siberian and Central Asian cases have something in common: they reveal historical contexts for the degradation of animal husbandry without its Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, vol. 56, nos. 1–2, 2017, pp. 1–5. © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1959 (print)/ISSN 1558-092X (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2017.1391538
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Dialogues with the Cold: Natural Low Temperatures in the Everyday Life of Rural Residents of Yakutia (Sakha Republic) in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Introduction: Ecology Lessons: Community Solidarity, Indigenous Knowledge, Civic Society in Crisis Fire and Water: Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Climate Challenges in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Manipulations of Public Consciousness in the Environmental Conflict on Kushtau On Defining and Registering the Indigenous Peoples of The North, Siberia and the Far East: Legal Process Documentation and Ramifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1