在网上动员极端主义:比较Facebook上澳大利亚和加拿大的右翼极端主义团体

Jade Hutchinson, Amarnath Amarasingam, R. Scrivens, Brian Ballsun-Stanton
{"title":"在网上动员极端主义:比较Facebook上澳大利亚和加拿大的右翼极端主义团体","authors":"Jade Hutchinson, Amarnath Amarasingam, R. Scrivens, Brian Ballsun-Stanton","doi":"10.1080/19434472.2021.1903064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Right-wing extremist groups harness popular social media platforms to accrue and mobilize followers. In recent years, researchers have examined the various themes and narratives espoused by extremist groups in the United States and Europe, and how these themes and narratives are employed to mobilize their followings on social media. Little, however, is comparatively known about how such efforts unfold within and between right-wing extremist groups in Australia and Canada. In this study, we conducted a cross-national comparative analysis of over eight years of online content found on 59 Australian and Canadian right-wing group pages on Facebook. Here we assessed the level of active and passive user engagement with posts and identified certain themes and narratives that generated the most user engagement. Overall, a number of ideological and behavioral commonalities and differences emerged in regard to patterns of active and passive user engagement, and the character of three prevailing themes: methods of violence, and references to national and racial identities. The results highlight the influence of both the national and transnational context in negotiating which themes and narratives resonate with Australian and Canadian right-wing online communities, and the multi-dimensional nature of right-wing user engagement and social mobilization on social media.","PeriodicalId":54174,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","volume":"15 1","pages":"215 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2021.1903064","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobilizing extremism online: comparing Australian and Canadian right-wing extremist groups on Facebook\",\"authors\":\"Jade Hutchinson, Amarnath Amarasingam, R. Scrivens, Brian Ballsun-Stanton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19434472.2021.1903064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Right-wing extremist groups harness popular social media platforms to accrue and mobilize followers. In recent years, researchers have examined the various themes and narratives espoused by extremist groups in the United States and Europe, and how these themes and narratives are employed to mobilize their followings on social media. Little, however, is comparatively known about how such efforts unfold within and between right-wing extremist groups in Australia and Canada. In this study, we conducted a cross-national comparative analysis of over eight years of online content found on 59 Australian and Canadian right-wing group pages on Facebook. Here we assessed the level of active and passive user engagement with posts and identified certain themes and narratives that generated the most user engagement. Overall, a number of ideological and behavioral commonalities and differences emerged in regard to patterns of active and passive user engagement, and the character of three prevailing themes: methods of violence, and references to national and racial identities. The results highlight the influence of both the national and transnational context in negotiating which themes and narratives resonate with Australian and Canadian right-wing online communities, and the multi-dimensional nature of right-wing user engagement and social mobilization on social media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2021.1903064\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1903064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1903064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要右翼极端组织利用流行的社交媒体平台来积累和动员追随者。近年来,研究人员研究了美国和欧洲极端组织所支持的各种主题和叙事,以及如何利用这些主题和叙事在社交媒体上动员他们的追随者。然而,相对而言,人们对澳大利亚和加拿大右翼极端组织内部和之间的这种努力是如何展开的知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们对Facebook上59个澳大利亚和加拿大右翼团体页面上8年多的在线内容进行了跨国比较分析。在这里,我们评估了用户对帖子的主动和被动参与程度,并确定了产生最多用户参与的某些主题和叙述。总的来说,在主动和被动用户参与模式以及三个主要主题的特征方面,出现了一些意识形态和行为上的共性和差异:暴力方法以及对民族和种族身份的提及。研究结果强调了国家和跨国背景在谈判哪些主题和叙事与澳大利亚和加拿大右翼网络社区产生共鸣方面的影响,以及右翼用户参与和社交媒体上的社会动员的多维度性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobilizing extremism online: comparing Australian and Canadian right-wing extremist groups on Facebook
ABSTRACT Right-wing extremist groups harness popular social media platforms to accrue and mobilize followers. In recent years, researchers have examined the various themes and narratives espoused by extremist groups in the United States and Europe, and how these themes and narratives are employed to mobilize their followings on social media. Little, however, is comparatively known about how such efforts unfold within and between right-wing extremist groups in Australia and Canada. In this study, we conducted a cross-national comparative analysis of over eight years of online content found on 59 Australian and Canadian right-wing group pages on Facebook. Here we assessed the level of active and passive user engagement with posts and identified certain themes and narratives that generated the most user engagement. Overall, a number of ideological and behavioral commonalities and differences emerged in regard to patterns of active and passive user engagement, and the character of three prevailing themes: methods of violence, and references to national and racial identities. The results highlight the influence of both the national and transnational context in negotiating which themes and narratives resonate with Australian and Canadian right-wing online communities, and the multi-dimensional nature of right-wing user engagement and social mobilization on social media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of gendered frames in far-right rhetoric in the West Was the 2019 Christchurch attack a black swan event? Understanding far-right violence in New Zealand Understanding and addressing the risk of disguised compliance in CVE programming ‘It's time to put the copes down and get to work’: a qualitative study of incel exit strategies on r/IncelExit Frame your friends close and your enemies closer: how al-Masra newspaper imagines individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1