用新设计的模拟住院第一天360度考试评估医学生能力的可行性研究

S. Harendza, P. Berberat, M. Kadmon
{"title":"用新设计的模拟住院第一天360度考试评估医学生能力的可行性研究","authors":"S. Harendza, P. Berberat, M. Kadmon","doi":"10.4172/2161-0711.1000550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nBackground: Many medical schools worldwide are in the process of curricular change towards competencebased undergraduate medical education to ease the transition to residency. Aspects of patient management, interprofessional interaction and the concept of entrustable professional activities are in the focus of medical educators. Such curricular changes require an assessment with valid and reliable measurements of competences feasible for large numbers of medical students. \nMethods: Seventy medical students from three German medical schools (Hamburg, Oldenburg, and Munich) participated in our newly designed 360-degree examination based on selected competences relevant for first year residents. A consulting hour with five simulated patients is followed by a patient management phase of 2.5 hours with interprofessional disturbances, followed by a 30-minutes handover of the patients to a resident. Different competences are assessed by the supervisors, simulated patients, nurses, residents, and by the participants themselves. All participants and research assistants evaluated the assessment regarding aspects of organization and content. \nResults: All participants, assessors, and research assistants were satisfied with the process, technical equipment, and organization of the assessment. All assessors and research assistants stated that their respective training prepared them well for their role in the assessment. The participating students felt satisfied with the content of the assessment. They considered the patient cases to be very realistic. While there was no difference between students in their final year and students below semester 11 with respect to feeling confident during history taking and handover, final year students felt significantly more confident (p=0.02) during the patient management phase. \nConclusion: It is feasible to implement a competence-based 360-degree assessment for a large group of students. Further analysis of the data will provide evidence whether students from medical schools with different undergraduate curricula perform differently with respect to competences relevant for first year residents.","PeriodicalId":73681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community medicine & health education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-0711.1000550","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Competences in Medical Students with a Newly Designed 360- Degree Examination of a Simulated First Day of Residency: A Feasibility Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Harendza, P. Berberat, M. Kadmon\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2161-0711.1000550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nBackground: Many medical schools worldwide are in the process of curricular change towards competencebased undergraduate medical education to ease the transition to residency. Aspects of patient management, interprofessional interaction and the concept of entrustable professional activities are in the focus of medical educators. Such curricular changes require an assessment with valid and reliable measurements of competences feasible for large numbers of medical students. \\nMethods: Seventy medical students from three German medical schools (Hamburg, Oldenburg, and Munich) participated in our newly designed 360-degree examination based on selected competences relevant for first year residents. A consulting hour with five simulated patients is followed by a patient management phase of 2.5 hours with interprofessional disturbances, followed by a 30-minutes handover of the patients to a resident. Different competences are assessed by the supervisors, simulated patients, nurses, residents, and by the participants themselves. All participants and research assistants evaluated the assessment regarding aspects of organization and content. \\nResults: All participants, assessors, and research assistants were satisfied with the process, technical equipment, and organization of the assessment. All assessors and research assistants stated that their respective training prepared them well for their role in the assessment. The participating students felt satisfied with the content of the assessment. They considered the patient cases to be very realistic. While there was no difference between students in their final year and students below semester 11 with respect to feeling confident during history taking and handover, final year students felt significantly more confident (p=0.02) during the patient management phase. \\nConclusion: It is feasible to implement a competence-based 360-degree assessment for a large group of students. Further analysis of the data will provide evidence whether students from medical schools with different undergraduate curricula perform differently with respect to competences relevant for first year residents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of community medicine & health education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-0711.1000550\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of community medicine & health education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0711.1000550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community medicine & health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0711.1000550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

摘要背景:世界各地的许多医学院都在向以能力为基础的本科医学教育转变课程,以缓解向住院医师的过渡。患者管理、跨专业互动和可持续专业活动的概念是医学教育工作者关注的焦点。这种课程改革需要对大量医学生的能力进行有效和可靠的评估。方法:来自三所德国医学院(汉堡、奥尔登堡和慕尼黑)的70名医学生参加了我们新设计的360度考试,该考试基于一年级居民的相关能力。对五名模拟患者进行咨询一小时后,进入2.5小时的跨专业干扰患者管理阶段,然后将患者移交给住院医师30分钟。不同的能力由主管、模拟患者、护士、住院医生和参与者自己进行评估。所有参与者和研究助理都对组织和内容方面的评估进行了评估。结果:所有参与者、评估员和研究助理都对评估的过程、技术设备和组织感到满意。所有评估员和研究助理都表示,他们各自的培训为他们在评估中的角色做好了充分准备。参与评估的学生对评估内容感到满意。他们认为这些病例非常现实。虽然大四学生和第11学期以下的学生在历史记录和交接过程中的自信感没有差异,但大四学生在患者管理阶段的自信感明显增强(p=0.02)。结论:对一大群学生实施基于能力的360度评估是可行的。对数据的进一步分析将提供证据,证明不同本科课程的医学院学生在与一年级住院医师相关的能力方面表现是否不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Competences in Medical Students with a Newly Designed 360- Degree Examination of a Simulated First Day of Residency: A Feasibility Study
Abstract Background: Many medical schools worldwide are in the process of curricular change towards competencebased undergraduate medical education to ease the transition to residency. Aspects of patient management, interprofessional interaction and the concept of entrustable professional activities are in the focus of medical educators. Such curricular changes require an assessment with valid and reliable measurements of competences feasible for large numbers of medical students. Methods: Seventy medical students from three German medical schools (Hamburg, Oldenburg, and Munich) participated in our newly designed 360-degree examination based on selected competences relevant for first year residents. A consulting hour with five simulated patients is followed by a patient management phase of 2.5 hours with interprofessional disturbances, followed by a 30-minutes handover of the patients to a resident. Different competences are assessed by the supervisors, simulated patients, nurses, residents, and by the participants themselves. All participants and research assistants evaluated the assessment regarding aspects of organization and content. Results: All participants, assessors, and research assistants were satisfied with the process, technical equipment, and organization of the assessment. All assessors and research assistants stated that their respective training prepared them well for their role in the assessment. The participating students felt satisfied with the content of the assessment. They considered the patient cases to be very realistic. While there was no difference between students in their final year and students below semester 11 with respect to feeling confident during history taking and handover, final year students felt significantly more confident (p=0.02) during the patient management phase. Conclusion: It is feasible to implement a competence-based 360-degree assessment for a large group of students. Further analysis of the data will provide evidence whether students from medical schools with different undergraduate curricula perform differently with respect to competences relevant for first year residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Covidalism©®: COVID Restrictions in USA have no Health Benefits at all. Parental Education Differently Boosts Health and Happiness of American Men and Women. What did the community health worker do that was helpful? Perceptions from patients with type 2 diabetes Psychosocial support by community health workers of children living with chronically ill family members The Effectiveness of a Curricular-Based Exercise Intervention on Bone Health and Body Composition in Swedish Boys and Girls in an Elementary School Setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1