考虑市场应用方面的高管教育混合学习方法的学生满意度模型

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0281
E. Negm
{"title":"考虑市场应用方面的高管教育混合学习方法的学生满意度模型","authors":"E. Negm","doi":"10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study investigates the main factors that lead to students’ satisfaction toward executive education blended learning.Design/methodology/approach Merging five theories (consumer satisfaction theory, self-determination theory, investment model, happy-productive student theory and service quality model), the author used quantitative research to develop a model, explaining executive education satisfaction taught in a blended learning approach. Administrated questionnaires were physically distributed in various business universities that offer education to mid-career executives in Egypt. Two hundred and seventy questionnaires were examined through structural equation modeling path coefficient analysis.Findings Results show that satisfaction with executive education in traditional classroom boundaries are due to three internal factors (personal/psychological): self-regulated learning, perceived future financial rewards and perceived ease of course; and two external factors: quality of instructor and course design. When courses are given online, satisfaction is developed due to two internal factors (personal/psychological): self-regulated learning and perceived future financial reward; and one external factor, course design.Practical implications Marketization signifies students as consumers of universities; student’s satisfaction is increasingly important for educational entities to attract and retain students. Thus, this study develops a coherent student’s satisfaction model to better manage and market executive education, leading to students’ contentment in theory and practice.Originality/value Student’s satisfaction has multiple facets that are stochastic as education evolves and develops. The contribution stems from the incorporation of various theories to explain student’s satisfaction of executive education taught in a blended approach: traditional classroom boundaries and digital platforms that offer access to online education. The research extracts significant set of reasons, showing executive education satisfaction is not entirely similar to other education programs; and satisfaction toward blended learning in executive education is not entirely similar to education offered solely online or physically.","PeriodicalId":45549,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A student’s satisfaction model for an executive education blended learning approach, considering aspects for marketing applications\",\"authors\":\"E. Negm\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This study investigates the main factors that lead to students’ satisfaction toward executive education blended learning.Design/methodology/approach Merging five theories (consumer satisfaction theory, self-determination theory, investment model, happy-productive student theory and service quality model), the author used quantitative research to develop a model, explaining executive education satisfaction taught in a blended learning approach. Administrated questionnaires were physically distributed in various business universities that offer education to mid-career executives in Egypt. Two hundred and seventy questionnaires were examined through structural equation modeling path coefficient analysis.Findings Results show that satisfaction with executive education in traditional classroom boundaries are due to three internal factors (personal/psychological): self-regulated learning, perceived future financial rewards and perceived ease of course; and two external factors: quality of instructor and course design. When courses are given online, satisfaction is developed due to two internal factors (personal/psychological): self-regulated learning and perceived future financial reward; and one external factor, course design.Practical implications Marketization signifies students as consumers of universities; student’s satisfaction is increasingly important for educational entities to attract and retain students. Thus, this study develops a coherent student’s satisfaction model to better manage and market executive education, leading to students’ contentment in theory and practice.Originality/value Student’s satisfaction has multiple facets that are stochastic as education evolves and develops. The contribution stems from the incorporation of various theories to explain student’s satisfaction of executive education taught in a blended approach: traditional classroom boundaries and digital platforms that offer access to online education. The research extracts significant set of reasons, showing executive education satisfaction is not entirely similar to other education programs; and satisfaction toward blended learning in executive education is not entirely similar to education offered solely online or physically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨影响学生对高管教育混合式学习满意度的主要因素。结合消费者满意度理论、自我决定理论、投资模型、快乐生产学生理论和服务质量模型这五种理论,作者采用定量研究的方法建立了一个模型,解释了混合式学习方式下高管教育的满意度。经管理的调查问卷在埃及各商业大学分发,这些大学为职业中期管理人员提供教育。通过结构方程建模路径系数分析,对270份问卷进行了调查。研究结果表明,对传统课堂边界高管教育的满意度主要来自三个内部因素(个人/心理):自我调节学习、感知未来的经济回报和感知课程的轻松程度;两个外部因素:教师素质和课程设计。当在线授课时,满意度的发展是由于两个内部因素(个人/心理):自我调节的学习和对未来经济回报的感知;还有一个外部因素,课程设计。市场化意味着学生是大学的消费者;学生的满意度对教育机构吸引和留住学生越来越重要。因此,本研究发展一个连贯的学生满意度模型,以更好地管理和营销高管教育,使学生在理论和实践上都感到满意。学生的满意度有多个方面,随着教育的发展和发展,这些方面是随机的。这一贡献源于将各种理论结合起来,以解释学生对以混合方式教授的高管教育的满意度:传统的课堂界限和提供在线教育的数字平台。研究发现,高管教育的满意度与其他教育项目并不完全相似;高管教育中混合式学习的满意度与单纯在线或实体教育并不完全相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A student’s satisfaction model for an executive education blended learning approach, considering aspects for marketing applications
Purpose This study investigates the main factors that lead to students’ satisfaction toward executive education blended learning.Design/methodology/approach Merging five theories (consumer satisfaction theory, self-determination theory, investment model, happy-productive student theory and service quality model), the author used quantitative research to develop a model, explaining executive education satisfaction taught in a blended learning approach. Administrated questionnaires were physically distributed in various business universities that offer education to mid-career executives in Egypt. Two hundred and seventy questionnaires were examined through structural equation modeling path coefficient analysis.Findings Results show that satisfaction with executive education in traditional classroom boundaries are due to three internal factors (personal/psychological): self-regulated learning, perceived future financial rewards and perceived ease of course; and two external factors: quality of instructor and course design. When courses are given online, satisfaction is developed due to two internal factors (personal/psychological): self-regulated learning and perceived future financial reward; and one external factor, course design.Practical implications Marketization signifies students as consumers of universities; student’s satisfaction is increasingly important for educational entities to attract and retain students. Thus, this study develops a coherent student’s satisfaction model to better manage and market executive education, leading to students’ contentment in theory and practice.Originality/value Student’s satisfaction has multiple facets that are stochastic as education evolves and develops. The contribution stems from the incorporation of various theories to explain student’s satisfaction of executive education taught in a blended approach: traditional classroom boundaries and digital platforms that offer access to online education. The research extracts significant set of reasons, showing executive education satisfaction is not entirely similar to other education programs; and satisfaction toward blended learning in executive education is not entirely similar to education offered solely online or physically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
How entrepreneurial environment and education influence university students' entrepreneurial intentions: the mediating role of entrepreneurial motivation Graduate employability skills of business students: the moderating role of reflective practices Benefits of a short course on mental health well-being and resilience for healthcare workers in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic Co-designing doctoral programs to enhance postgraduate students' employability: insights from industry stakeholders Higher education student engagement with online learning: the role of perceived value and academic entitlement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1