GWAS统计方法和复杂性状高通量测序关联研究的最新进展

Duo Jiang, Miaoyan Wang
{"title":"GWAS统计方法和复杂性状高通量测序关联研究的最新进展","authors":"Duo Jiang, Miaoyan Wang","doi":"10.1080/24709360.2018.1529346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The advent of large-scale genetic studies has helped bring a new era of biomedical research on dissecting the genetic architecture of complex human disease. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and next-generation sequencing studies are two popular tools for identifying genetic variants that are associated with complex traits. This article overviews some of the most important statistical tools for analyzing data from these two types of studies, with an emphasis on single-SNP tests for common variants and region-based tests for rare variants. We compare various statistical methods for common and rare variants in humans, and describe some critical considerations to guide the choice of an analysis method. Also discussed are the related topics of sample ascertainment, missing heritability, and multiple testing correction, as well as some remaining analytical challenges presented by complex trait association mapping using genomic data obtained via high-throughput technologies.","PeriodicalId":37240,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"132 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24709360.2018.1529346","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent developments in statistical methods for GWAS and high-throughput sequencing association studies of complex traits\",\"authors\":\"Duo Jiang, Miaoyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24709360.2018.1529346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The advent of large-scale genetic studies has helped bring a new era of biomedical research on dissecting the genetic architecture of complex human disease. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and next-generation sequencing studies are two popular tools for identifying genetic variants that are associated with complex traits. This article overviews some of the most important statistical tools for analyzing data from these two types of studies, with an emphasis on single-SNP tests for common variants and region-based tests for rare variants. We compare various statistical methods for common and rare variants in humans, and describe some critical considerations to guide the choice of an analysis method. Also discussed are the related topics of sample ascertainment, missing heritability, and multiple testing correction, as well as some remaining analytical challenges presented by complex trait association mapping using genomic data obtained via high-throughput technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"132 - 159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24709360.2018.1529346\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1529346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1529346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

大规模基因研究的出现为解剖复杂人类疾病的遗传结构带来了生物医学研究的新时代。全基因组关联研究(GWASs)和下一代测序研究是鉴定与复杂性状相关的遗传变异的两种常用工具。本文概述了用于分析这两类研究数据的一些最重要的统计工具,重点是针对常见变异的单snp检测和针对罕见变异的基于区域的检测。我们比较了人类常见和罕见变异的各种统计方法,并描述了指导分析方法选择的一些关键考虑因素。还讨论了样本确定、缺失遗传性和多重测试校正等相关主题,以及利用高通量技术获得的基因组数据进行复杂性状关联映射所带来的一些剩余分析挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recent developments in statistical methods for GWAS and high-throughput sequencing association studies of complex traits
ABSTRACT The advent of large-scale genetic studies has helped bring a new era of biomedical research on dissecting the genetic architecture of complex human disease. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and next-generation sequencing studies are two popular tools for identifying genetic variants that are associated with complex traits. This article overviews some of the most important statistical tools for analyzing data from these two types of studies, with an emphasis on single-SNP tests for common variants and region-based tests for rare variants. We compare various statistical methods for common and rare variants in humans, and describe some critical considerations to guide the choice of an analysis method. Also discussed are the related topics of sample ascertainment, missing heritability, and multiple testing correction, as well as some remaining analytical challenges presented by complex trait association mapping using genomic data obtained via high-throughput technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biostatistics and Epidemiology
Biostatistics and Epidemiology Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Adjusting for bias due to measurement error in functional quantile regression models with error-prone functional and scalar covariates. The analysis of Salmonella’s ability to survive in different external environments Notice of duplicate publication: public transportation network scan for rapid surveillance Global Odds Model with Proportional Odds and Trend Odds Applied to Gross and Microscopic Brain Infarcts. Flexible and robust procedure for subgroup inference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1