使用抗凝剂而非抗血小板与膀胱流出道手术后的血尿并发症有关

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1177/20514158221122622
Rebecca Hilbert, Lisa M. Bibby, N. Boxall, Luxna Srinivasan, T. Aho, B. Lamb
{"title":"使用抗凝剂而非抗血小板与膀胱流出道手术后的血尿并发症有关","authors":"Rebecca Hilbert, Lisa M. Bibby, N. Boxall, Luxna Srinivasan, T. Aho, B. Lamb","doi":"10.1177/20514158221122622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evidence on the safety of peri-procedural management of more novel antithrombotic medication in the context of a wider option of bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) procedures is limited. We aimed to assess the risk of delayed discharge or readmission (specifically due to haematuria) for all patients undergoing BOO surgery. Prospective identification of all patients undergoing any type of BOO procedure at a single centre between April and December 2019 was performed. Clinical information was obtained from electronic patient records to scrutinise medications, procedure, delayed discharge and readmission within 30 days of surgery due to haematuria. Two hundred forty patients were identified. In all, 78.6% (22/28) of patients on anticoagulants were on novel agents. The delayed discharge rate due to haematuria was 0.58% (1/171) in the no antithrombotic group and 7.14% (2/28) in the anticoagulant-only group. Increased age and perioperative anticoagulant therapy predicated delayed discharge. Readmissions due to haematuria were statistically significant with 1.16% (2/171) readmitted with no antithombotics, compared with 14.3% (4/28) of those on anticoagulants ( p ⩽ 0.01). Perioperative anticoagulant use is associated with an increased risk of readmission following BOO surgery. Further work is required to help stratify and lower risk, especially with evolving surgical and medical technologies. 3b","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticoagulant but not antiplatelet use is associated with haematuria complications after bladder outflow surgery\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Hilbert, Lisa M. Bibby, N. Boxall, Luxna Srinivasan, T. Aho, B. Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20514158221122622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evidence on the safety of peri-procedural management of more novel antithrombotic medication in the context of a wider option of bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) procedures is limited. We aimed to assess the risk of delayed discharge or readmission (specifically due to haematuria) for all patients undergoing BOO surgery. Prospective identification of all patients undergoing any type of BOO procedure at a single centre between April and December 2019 was performed. Clinical information was obtained from electronic patient records to scrutinise medications, procedure, delayed discharge and readmission within 30 days of surgery due to haematuria. Two hundred forty patients were identified. In all, 78.6% (22/28) of patients on anticoagulants were on novel agents. The delayed discharge rate due to haematuria was 0.58% (1/171) in the no antithrombotic group and 7.14% (2/28) in the anticoagulant-only group. Increased age and perioperative anticoagulant therapy predicated delayed discharge. Readmissions due to haematuria were statistically significant with 1.16% (2/171) readmitted with no antithombotics, compared with 14.3% (4/28) of those on anticoagulants ( p ⩽ 0.01). Perioperative anticoagulant use is associated with an increased risk of readmission following BOO surgery. Further work is required to help stratify and lower risk, especially with evolving surgical and medical technologies. 3b\",\"PeriodicalId\":15471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221122622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221122622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在更广泛的膀胱流出道梗阻(BOO)手术选择的背景下,更新颖的抗血栓药物的围手术期管理的安全性证据有限。我们旨在评估所有接受BOO手术的患者延迟出院或再次入院(特别是由于血尿)的风险。对2019年4月至12月期间在一个中心接受任何类型BOO手术的所有患者进行了前瞻性鉴定。从电子患者记录中获得临床信息,以仔细检查药物、手术、延迟出院和30天内再次入院 由于血尿进行了数天的手术。确认了240名患者。总的来说,78.6%(22/28)使用抗凝剂的患者使用了新型药物。无抗凝血剂组因血尿导致的延迟出院率为0.58%(1/171),仅使用抗凝血剂的组为7.14%(2/28)。年龄增加和围手术期抗凝治疗可预测延迟出院。由于血尿导致的再入院具有统计学意义,1.16%(2/171)的患者在没有抗凝剂的情况下再次入院,而使用抗凝剂的患者为14.3%(4/28)(p ⩽ 0.01)。围手术期使用抗凝剂与BOO手术后再次入院的风险增加有关。需要进一步的工作来帮助分层和降低风险,特别是随着外科和医疗技术的发展。3b
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anticoagulant but not antiplatelet use is associated with haematuria complications after bladder outflow surgery
The evidence on the safety of peri-procedural management of more novel antithrombotic medication in the context of a wider option of bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) procedures is limited. We aimed to assess the risk of delayed discharge or readmission (specifically due to haematuria) for all patients undergoing BOO surgery. Prospective identification of all patients undergoing any type of BOO procedure at a single centre between April and December 2019 was performed. Clinical information was obtained from electronic patient records to scrutinise medications, procedure, delayed discharge and readmission within 30 days of surgery due to haematuria. Two hundred forty patients were identified. In all, 78.6% (22/28) of patients on anticoagulants were on novel agents. The delayed discharge rate due to haematuria was 0.58% (1/171) in the no antithrombotic group and 7.14% (2/28) in the anticoagulant-only group. Increased age and perioperative anticoagulant therapy predicated delayed discharge. Readmissions due to haematuria were statistically significant with 1.16% (2/171) readmitted with no antithombotics, compared with 14.3% (4/28) of those on anticoagulants ( p ⩽ 0.01). Perioperative anticoagulant use is associated with an increased risk of readmission following BOO surgery. Further work is required to help stratify and lower risk, especially with evolving surgical and medical technologies. 3b
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1