在中度和长期缺血的猪模型中,缺血后处理不能减少梗死面积

J. Nuche, Carlos Galán‐Arriola, R. Fernández-Jiménez, María Isabel Higuero Verdejo, Victoria I. González Pastor, Ravi Vazirani, Arturo Lanaspa, María Anguita-Gámez, Gonzalo J. López Martín, Javier Sánchez-González, and, B. Ibáñez
{"title":"在中度和长期缺血的猪模型中,缺血后处理不能减少梗死面积","authors":"J. Nuche, Carlos Galán‐Arriola, R. Fernández-Jiménez, María Isabel Higuero Verdejo, Victoria I. González Pastor, Ravi Vazirani, Arturo Lanaspa, María Anguita-Gámez, Gonzalo J. López Martín, Javier Sánchez-González, and, B. Ibáñez","doi":"10.24875/recice.m22000333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives: Ischemic postconditioning (iPost, coronary intermittent re-occlusion maneuvers immediately after PCI-mediated reperfusion) has been proposed to limit infarct size (IS). However, a few experimental and clinical contradictory results have been reported. We hypothesized that iPost cardioprotection is affected by the duration of ischemia. Our objective was to assess IS in the presence/absence of iPost in a pig model of myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration. Methods: Large white pigs (n = 38) underwent angioplasty balloon-induced coronary ischemia followed by reperfusion. Two set of experiments were carried out: intermediate (30 min) and prolonged (40 min) ischemia. In both, pigs were allocated on a 1:1 ratio to receive iPost (4 cycles of “1 min balloon inflation followed by 1 min deflation” upon reperfusion) or control. Animals underwent contrast-enhanced multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance scan on day 7. Primary outcome measure was cardiac magnetic resonance-based IS (% of left ventricular mass). The interaction between treatment allocation and ischemia duration was assessed using a 2-way ANOVA test. Results: iPost was not associated with smaller IS in any of the ischemia duration protocols (intermediate ischemia: 0.3% [0.0 – 3.9] vs 0.9% [0.0 – 2.6] in iPost and control, respectively; P = .378; long ischemia: 31.1% [27.3 – 32.8] vs 27.3% [25.1 – 27.5]; P = .248). When both ischemia-duration protocols were combined, iPost was not associated with smaller IS (3.9% [0.0 – 30.9] vs 4.6% [0.2 – 25.1]; P = .672). T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost compared to controls (1306.2 ms [1190.7 – 1492.7] vs 1240.7 ms [1167.1 – 1304.5]; P = .024). Conclusions: In a pig model of reperfused myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration, iPost failed to reduce IS. T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost indicative of the potential harm involved in this procedure.","PeriodicalId":34613,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ischemic postconditioning fails to reduce infarct size in pig models of intermediate and prolonged ischemia\",\"authors\":\"J. Nuche, Carlos Galán‐Arriola, R. Fernández-Jiménez, María Isabel Higuero Verdejo, Victoria I. González Pastor, Ravi Vazirani, Arturo Lanaspa, María Anguita-Gámez, Gonzalo J. López Martín, Javier Sánchez-González, and, B. Ibáñez\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/recice.m22000333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and objectives: Ischemic postconditioning (iPost, coronary intermittent re-occlusion maneuvers immediately after PCI-mediated reperfusion) has been proposed to limit infarct size (IS). However, a few experimental and clinical contradictory results have been reported. We hypothesized that iPost cardioprotection is affected by the duration of ischemia. Our objective was to assess IS in the presence/absence of iPost in a pig model of myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration. Methods: Large white pigs (n = 38) underwent angioplasty balloon-induced coronary ischemia followed by reperfusion. Two set of experiments were carried out: intermediate (30 min) and prolonged (40 min) ischemia. In both, pigs were allocated on a 1:1 ratio to receive iPost (4 cycles of “1 min balloon inflation followed by 1 min deflation” upon reperfusion) or control. Animals underwent contrast-enhanced multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance scan on day 7. Primary outcome measure was cardiac magnetic resonance-based IS (% of left ventricular mass). The interaction between treatment allocation and ischemia duration was assessed using a 2-way ANOVA test. Results: iPost was not associated with smaller IS in any of the ischemia duration protocols (intermediate ischemia: 0.3% [0.0 – 3.9] vs 0.9% [0.0 – 2.6] in iPost and control, respectively; P = .378; long ischemia: 31.1% [27.3 – 32.8] vs 27.3% [25.1 – 27.5]; P = .248). When both ischemia-duration protocols were combined, iPost was not associated with smaller IS (3.9% [0.0 – 30.9] vs 4.6% [0.2 – 25.1]; P = .672). T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost compared to controls (1306.2 ms [1190.7 – 1492.7] vs 1240.7 ms [1167.1 – 1304.5]; P = .024). Conclusions: In a pig model of reperfused myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration, iPost failed to reduce IS. T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost indicative of the potential harm involved in this procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/recice.m22000333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recice.m22000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的:缺血后处理(iPost,PCI介导的再灌注后立即进行冠状动脉间歇性再闭塞操作)已被提出用于限制梗死面积(IS)。然而,已经报道了一些实验和临床上相互矛盾的结果。我们假设iPost的心脏保护作用受缺血持续时间的影响。我们的目的是在不同缺血时间的猪心肌梗死模型中,在iPost存在/不存在的情况下评估IS。方法:大白猪(n=38)接受血管成形术球囊诱导的冠状动脉缺血再灌注。进行了两组实验:中间(30分钟)和延长(40分钟)缺血。在这两种情况下,猪以1:1的比例被分配接受iPost(再灌注后“1分钟球囊膨胀,然后1分钟放气”的4个周期)或对照。动物在第7天接受对比增强多参数心脏磁共振扫描。主要转归指标是基于心脏磁共振的IS(占左心室质量的%)。使用双向ANOVA检验评估治疗分配和缺血持续时间之间的相互作用。结果:在任何缺血持续时间方案中,iPost都与较小的IS无关(iPost和对照组中,中度缺血:分别为0.3%[0.0-3.9]和0.9%[0.0-2.6];P=.378;长期缺血:31.1%[27.3-32.8]和27.3%[25.1-27.5];P=.248),iPost与较小的IS无关(3.9%[0.0-30.9]vs 4.6%[0.2-25.1];P=.672)。与对照组相比,接受iPost的动物的T1弛豫时间更长(1306.2 ms[110.7–1492.7]vs 1240.7 ms[1167.1–1304.5];P=.024)。结论:在可变缺血时间的再灌注心肌梗死猪模型中,iPost未能降低IS。在接受iPost的动物中,T1弛豫时间更长,这表明该过程中涉及的潜在危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ischemic postconditioning fails to reduce infarct size in pig models of intermediate and prolonged ischemia
Introduction and objectives: Ischemic postconditioning (iPost, coronary intermittent re-occlusion maneuvers immediately after PCI-mediated reperfusion) has been proposed to limit infarct size (IS). However, a few experimental and clinical contradictory results have been reported. We hypothesized that iPost cardioprotection is affected by the duration of ischemia. Our objective was to assess IS in the presence/absence of iPost in a pig model of myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration. Methods: Large white pigs (n = 38) underwent angioplasty balloon-induced coronary ischemia followed by reperfusion. Two set of experiments were carried out: intermediate (30 min) and prolonged (40 min) ischemia. In both, pigs were allocated on a 1:1 ratio to receive iPost (4 cycles of “1 min balloon inflation followed by 1 min deflation” upon reperfusion) or control. Animals underwent contrast-enhanced multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance scan on day 7. Primary outcome measure was cardiac magnetic resonance-based IS (% of left ventricular mass). The interaction between treatment allocation and ischemia duration was assessed using a 2-way ANOVA test. Results: iPost was not associated with smaller IS in any of the ischemia duration protocols (intermediate ischemia: 0.3% [0.0 – 3.9] vs 0.9% [0.0 – 2.6] in iPost and control, respectively; P = .378; long ischemia: 31.1% [27.3 – 32.8] vs 27.3% [25.1 – 27.5]; P = .248). When both ischemia-duration protocols were combined, iPost was not associated with smaller IS (3.9% [0.0 – 30.9] vs 4.6% [0.2 – 25.1]; P = .672). T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost compared to controls (1306.2 ms [1190.7 – 1492.7] vs 1240.7 ms [1167.1 – 1304.5]; P = .024). Conclusions: In a pig model of reperfused myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration, iPost failed to reduce IS. T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost indicative of the potential harm involved in this procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impella-Clip: a secure and effective strategy in cardiogenic shock due to acute severe mitral regurgitation. Case resolution New TAVI technique for difficult valve crossing Marking a milestone. REC: Interventional Cardiology assigned its first impact factor Cardiac catheterization activity in pediatric cardiac transplantation. Can catheterization needs be predicted? The PULSTA valve in native right ventricular outflow tract: initial experience in 3 Spanish hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1