数学刻板印象与女性:传播学学生数学焦虑的性别差异

IF 0.5 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminismos Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.14198/fem.2023.42.08
Miren Berasategi Zeberio
{"title":"数学刻板印象与女性:传播学学生数学焦虑的性别差异","authors":"Miren Berasategi Zeberio","doi":"10.14198/fem.2023.42.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizens are required to understand an increasingly datafied reality to perform sensible decision making and be active participants in society. However, our ability to grasp that complexity, especially when it involves data in the form of numbers, is affected by limiting factors such as mathematics anxiety. In the case of women, how they face the reading of content based on data or numbers affects their daily lives, including career choice. Playing a central mediating role in transmitting increasingly datafied information, journalism is an interesting research object. This study examines the notion that journalism students –especially female students– are «bad with numbers» through the measurement of math anxiety of 185 Communication students, looking for correlations with their math competency. Results show that students manifest a low competency in math, paired with high math anxiety, which is the factor that best serves as an explanation for competency results. Specifically, only students with medium-low values of math anxiety pass the competency test. However, no sex differences were found in competency, while small differences in math anxiety (with women displaying slightly higher anxiety values than men) were identified. Even if the minor sex differences in math anxiety found in this study are not statistically significant, investigating whether this is also the case in other fields or in a random sample remains relevant, as these results defy previous misunderstandings of women’s capacities that are significant to understand the interactions of women with data.","PeriodicalId":32557,"journal":{"name":"Feminismos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotypes about mathematics and women: sex differences in mathematics anxiety of communication students\",\"authors\":\"Miren Berasategi Zeberio\",\"doi\":\"10.14198/fem.2023.42.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Citizens are required to understand an increasingly datafied reality to perform sensible decision making and be active participants in society. However, our ability to grasp that complexity, especially when it involves data in the form of numbers, is affected by limiting factors such as mathematics anxiety. In the case of women, how they face the reading of content based on data or numbers affects their daily lives, including career choice. Playing a central mediating role in transmitting increasingly datafied information, journalism is an interesting research object. This study examines the notion that journalism students –especially female students– are «bad with numbers» through the measurement of math anxiety of 185 Communication students, looking for correlations with their math competency. Results show that students manifest a low competency in math, paired with high math anxiety, which is the factor that best serves as an explanation for competency results. Specifically, only students with medium-low values of math anxiety pass the competency test. However, no sex differences were found in competency, while small differences in math anxiety (with women displaying slightly higher anxiety values than men) were identified. Even if the minor sex differences in math anxiety found in this study are not statistically significant, investigating whether this is also the case in other fields or in a random sample remains relevant, as these results defy previous misunderstandings of women’s capacities that are significant to understand the interactions of women with data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminismos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminismos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2023.42.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminismos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2023.42.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民必须了解日益数据化的现实,才能做出明智的决策,成为社会的积极参与者。然而,我们掌握这种复杂性的能力,尤其是当它涉及数字形式的数据时,会受到数学焦虑等限制因素的影响。就女性而言,她们如何面对基于数据或数字的内容阅读会影响她们的日常生活,包括职业选择。新闻学在传递日益数据化的信息方面发挥着核心的中介作用,是一个有趣的研究对象。本研究通过对185名通信专业学生的数学焦虑进行测量,寻找与他们的数学能力的相关性,检验了新闻专业学生——尤其是女生——“数字不好”的概念。结果表明,学生在数学方面表现出较低的能力,同时伴有较高的数学焦虑,这是最能解释能力结果的因素。具体来说,只有数学焦虑值为中低的学生才能通过能力测试。然而,在能力方面没有发现性别差异,而在数学焦虑方面存在微小差异(女性表现出的焦虑值略高于男性)。即使这项研究中发现的数学焦虑的微小性别差异在统计上并不显著,但调查其他领域或随机样本中的情况是否也是如此仍然具有相关性,因为这些结果打破了以前对女性能力的误解,而这些误解对理解女性与数据的互动具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotypes about mathematics and women: sex differences in mathematics anxiety of communication students
Citizens are required to understand an increasingly datafied reality to perform sensible decision making and be active participants in society. However, our ability to grasp that complexity, especially when it involves data in the form of numbers, is affected by limiting factors such as mathematics anxiety. In the case of women, how they face the reading of content based on data or numbers affects their daily lives, including career choice. Playing a central mediating role in transmitting increasingly datafied information, journalism is an interesting research object. This study examines the notion that journalism students –especially female students– are «bad with numbers» through the measurement of math anxiety of 185 Communication students, looking for correlations with their math competency. Results show that students manifest a low competency in math, paired with high math anxiety, which is the factor that best serves as an explanation for competency results. Specifically, only students with medium-low values of math anxiety pass the competency test. However, no sex differences were found in competency, while small differences in math anxiety (with women displaying slightly higher anxiety values than men) were identified. Even if the minor sex differences in math anxiety found in this study are not statistically significant, investigating whether this is also the case in other fields or in a random sample remains relevant, as these results defy previous misunderstandings of women’s capacities that are significant to understand the interactions of women with data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived gender equality in caregiving and mental health: the impact of the COVID-19 health crisis in a sample of Andalusian women La comunicación de las mujeres y la política en TikTok. Representación, contenidos y mensajes La criatura en mí: género y salud mental en Why be happy when you could be normal? y Fármaco Repensando el malestar de las mujeres y la atención psiquiátrica desde una mirada descolonial: aportes a una práctica antirracista Factores y rutinas profesionales que influyen en la visibilidad de las mujeres científicas en los medios digitales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1