环境富集、季节性和软放生对人工饲养的东部地狱弯尾龟(Cryptobranchus alleaniensis alleaniensis)的地盘保留和存活的影响比较

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Herpetologica Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1655/Herpetologica-D-21-00014
N. Burgmeier, Emily B. McCallen, Erin K. Kenison, ROD N. Williams
{"title":"环境富集、季节性和软放生对人工饲养的东部地狱弯尾龟(Cryptobranchus alleaniensis alleaniensis)的地盘保留和存活的影响比较","authors":"N. Burgmeier, Emily B. McCallen, Erin K. Kenison, ROD N. Williams","doi":"10.1655/Herpetologica-D-21-00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Translocations of captive-reared animals are commonly used to stabilize declining wildlife populations. However, captive-reared animals are often raised in conditions dissimilar to their release sites and lacking natural characteristics, which could alter movement patterns and postrelease survivorship. These patterns can be further altered by season of release and soft-release conditions. We reared juvenile Eastern Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) for 18 mo in captivity in one of two conditions: a control condition with low-velocity water flow (unconditioned) or a treatment condition with moving water (conditioned) that simulated natural flow velocities at their intended release site. We divided 4-yr-old Hellbenders (n = 118) into six treatment groups to determine the effects of release season (fall or summer), release type (standard soft release or enhanced soft release), and conditioning (unconditioned or conditioned) on the number of days until first movement, release site retention, and survival. In November 2017, we released 80 radio-tagged individuals (40 conditioned and 40 unconditioned) into soft-release structures in the Blue River, Indiana. In July 2018, we released another 38 radio-tagged individuals (18 conditioned and 20 unconditioned) into soft-release structures at the same site. After release, we tracked each individual one to three times weekly for 10 mo (fall release) or 12 mo (summer release). We found that treatment groups released into caged cobble beds (i.e., enhanced soft release) delayed their first movement and had higher release site retention relative to groups released under caged shelter rocks (i.e., standard soft release). We found that conditioning had a positive effect on survival but only in the treatment group released in the summer. By combining techniques and releasing conditioned individuals in the summer using enhanced soft releases, we increased annual survival of captive-reared Hellbenders from a probability of 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31–0.79) to 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55–0.99). Our results provide important information about techniques that can be adopted across captive-rearing programs to help maximize the conservation success of Eastern Hellbenders.","PeriodicalId":56312,"journal":{"name":"Herpetologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effects of Environmental Enrichment, Seasonality, and Soft Release on Site Retention and Survivorship of Captive-Reared Eastern Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis)\",\"authors\":\"N. Burgmeier, Emily B. McCallen, Erin K. Kenison, ROD N. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1655/Herpetologica-D-21-00014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Translocations of captive-reared animals are commonly used to stabilize declining wildlife populations. However, captive-reared animals are often raised in conditions dissimilar to their release sites and lacking natural characteristics, which could alter movement patterns and postrelease survivorship. These patterns can be further altered by season of release and soft-release conditions. We reared juvenile Eastern Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) for 18 mo in captivity in one of two conditions: a control condition with low-velocity water flow (unconditioned) or a treatment condition with moving water (conditioned) that simulated natural flow velocities at their intended release site. We divided 4-yr-old Hellbenders (n = 118) into six treatment groups to determine the effects of release season (fall or summer), release type (standard soft release or enhanced soft release), and conditioning (unconditioned or conditioned) on the number of days until first movement, release site retention, and survival. In November 2017, we released 80 radio-tagged individuals (40 conditioned and 40 unconditioned) into soft-release structures in the Blue River, Indiana. In July 2018, we released another 38 radio-tagged individuals (18 conditioned and 20 unconditioned) into soft-release structures at the same site. After release, we tracked each individual one to three times weekly for 10 mo (fall release) or 12 mo (summer release). We found that treatment groups released into caged cobble beds (i.e., enhanced soft release) delayed their first movement and had higher release site retention relative to groups released under caged shelter rocks (i.e., standard soft release). We found that conditioning had a positive effect on survival but only in the treatment group released in the summer. By combining techniques and releasing conditioned individuals in the summer using enhanced soft releases, we increased annual survival of captive-reared Hellbenders from a probability of 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31–0.79) to 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55–0.99). Our results provide important information about techniques that can be adopted across captive-rearing programs to help maximize the conservation success of Eastern Hellbenders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herpetologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herpetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-21-00014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herpetologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-21-00014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:圈养动物的迁移通常用于稳定不断减少的野生动物种群。然而,圈养动物通常在与放生地点不同的条件下饲养,并且缺乏自然特征,这可能会改变运动模式和放生后的存活率。释放季节和软释放条件可以进一步改变这些模式。我们在以下两种条件中的一种条件下圈养了幼年东方Hellbenders(隐鳃亚目alleganiensis Alleganienis)18个月:低速水流的控制条件(无条件)或模拟其预期释放地点自然流速的流动水的处理条件(有条件)。我们将4岁的Hellbenders(n=118)分为六个治疗组,以确定释放季节(秋季或夏季)、释放类型(标准软释放或增强软释放)和条件调节(非条件或条件调节)对首次运动前天数、释放部位保留和存活的影响。2017年11月,我们将80个无线电标记个体(40个条件个体和40个非条件个体)释放到印第安纳州蓝河的软释放结构中。2018年7月,我们在同一地点将另外38个无线电标记个体(18个条件个体和20个非条件个体)释放到软释放结构中。发布后,我们每周跟踪每个人一到三次,持续10个月(秋季发布)或12个月(夏季发布)。我们发现,与在笼状遮蔽岩石下释放的组(即标准软释放)相比,被释放到笼状卵石床中的处理组(即增强软释放)延迟了它们的第一次移动,并且释放部位保留率更高。我们发现,调理对存活率有积极影响,但仅在夏季释放的治疗组中。通过结合技术并在夏季使用增强的软释放释放释放受条件影响的个体,我们将圈养Hellbenders的年生存率从0.50(95%置信区间[CI]=0.31–0.79)提高到0.74(95%可信区间=0.55–0.99)。我们的研究结果提供了关于圈养计划中可采用的技术的重要信息,以帮助最大限度地保护东部Hellbender。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the Effects of Environmental Enrichment, Seasonality, and Soft Release on Site Retention and Survivorship of Captive-Reared Eastern Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis)
Abstract: Translocations of captive-reared animals are commonly used to stabilize declining wildlife populations. However, captive-reared animals are often raised in conditions dissimilar to their release sites and lacking natural characteristics, which could alter movement patterns and postrelease survivorship. These patterns can be further altered by season of release and soft-release conditions. We reared juvenile Eastern Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) for 18 mo in captivity in one of two conditions: a control condition with low-velocity water flow (unconditioned) or a treatment condition with moving water (conditioned) that simulated natural flow velocities at their intended release site. We divided 4-yr-old Hellbenders (n = 118) into six treatment groups to determine the effects of release season (fall or summer), release type (standard soft release or enhanced soft release), and conditioning (unconditioned or conditioned) on the number of days until first movement, release site retention, and survival. In November 2017, we released 80 radio-tagged individuals (40 conditioned and 40 unconditioned) into soft-release structures in the Blue River, Indiana. In July 2018, we released another 38 radio-tagged individuals (18 conditioned and 20 unconditioned) into soft-release structures at the same site. After release, we tracked each individual one to three times weekly for 10 mo (fall release) or 12 mo (summer release). We found that treatment groups released into caged cobble beds (i.e., enhanced soft release) delayed their first movement and had higher release site retention relative to groups released under caged shelter rocks (i.e., standard soft release). We found that conditioning had a positive effect on survival but only in the treatment group released in the summer. By combining techniques and releasing conditioned individuals in the summer using enhanced soft releases, we increased annual survival of captive-reared Hellbenders from a probability of 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31–0.79) to 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55–0.99). Our results provide important information about techniques that can be adopted across captive-rearing programs to help maximize the conservation success of Eastern Hellbenders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herpetologica
Herpetologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1936, Herpetologica is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal serving herpetologists, biologists, ecologists, conservationists, researchers and the scientific community. The journal contains original research papers and essays about the biology of reptiles and amphibians, and covers many relevant topics including: behavior, conservation, ecology, genetics, morphology, physiology and taxonomy.
期刊最新文献
Awardees of the 2023 E.E. Williams Research Grants Joseph C. Mitchell Grant in Herpetology Call for Applications E.E. Williams Research Grant Call for Applications Water Turbidity and Plant Density Influence Shell Shape in Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta) First Comprehensive Tadpole Description of the Relict and Endemic Mountain Frog Chrysopaa sternosignata (Murray 1885) from Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1