工作与生活的平衡以及给法学院学生休息的需要

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW University of Pittsburgh Law Review Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI:10.5195/lawreview.2022.848
J. Todres
{"title":"工作与生活的平衡以及给法学院学生休息的需要","authors":"J. Todres","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health. Research shows that attorneys experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues at higher rates than the general population. Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being. We have known for years that students’ happiness and well-being tends to decline over their law school years, yet the response by most law schools has been patchwork, slow, and largely reactive. An unhealthy work-life balance remains the norm. This Article calls on law schools to do more to create a climate and culture in which students can achieve a healthier work-life balance. While there are a range of issues that need to be addressed, this Article focuses on the specific issue of law school culture discouraging taking time off. Ultimately, if law students—the newest members of our profession—are going to achieve and maintain a healthy work-life balance, it is not enough for law schools to simply encourage students to take care of themselves. Law school faculty and administrators need to create the conditions in which self-care is not only possible but welcome. A key component of that includes enabling students to take time off. * Jonathan Todres is a Distinguished University Professor and Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law. Thank you to Meera Deo, Jakki Petzold, and the Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) for their generosity in sharing LSSSE survey data and, more generally, for their important work on law student well-being issues. Thank you also to Caren Morrison and Nirej Sekhon for their helpful feedback on this Article and to Lauren Meeler for her excellent research assistance and valuable perspective on these issues. Finally, and most important, I want to thank the students in my Spring 2021 seminar for taking this journey with me. The legal profession is very fortunate to count you among its members. U N I V E R S I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G H L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E P A G E | 2 | V O L . 8 3 | 2 0 2 2 ISSN 1942-8405 (online) ● DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.848 http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu INTRODUCTION One of the most worthwhile assignments I have given to students in the past fifteen years was to stop working. Literally. I assigned them a 72-hour break from work.1 I did this out of growing concern that law schools are not doing enough to address the nonstop nature of the law school work culture and its adverse effects on student well-being. It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health.2 Research shows that “lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”3 Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being.4 We have known for a while that students’ happiness and wellbeing tends to decline over their law school years.5 Although law schools have 1 Jonathan Todres, An “Alternative Assignment” for Law Students, JONATHAN TODRES (Apr. 27, 2021), http://jonathantodres.com/blog/2021/4/27/an-alternative-assignment-for-law-students [https://perma.cc/ 7AF5-LG6R]; see also infra Part II. 2 Jerome M. Organ, What Do We Know About the Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction of Lawyers? A MetaAnalysis of Research on Lawyer Satisfaction and Well-Being, 8 U. ST. THOMAS L.J. 225, 268 (2011) (“[T]he fact that roughly 80% of lawyers consistently describe themselves as being ‘satisfied’ still has to be reconciled with the separate empirical data that indicates lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”); William W. Eaton et al., Occupations and the Prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder, 32 J. OCCUPATIONAL MED. 1079, 1083 (1990) (Of all professionals in the United States, lawyers suffer from the highest rate of depression after adjusting for socio-demographic factors, and they are 3.6 times more likely to suffer from major depressive disorder than the rest of the employed population.); Martin E.P. Seligman, Paul R. Verkuil & Terry H. Kang, Why Lawyers Are Unhappy, 10 DEAKIN L. REV. 49, 53 (2005) (“Lawyers are also at a greater risk for heart disease, alcoholism and drug use than the general population.”). 3 Organ, supra note 2, at 268. 4 See, e.g., Lawrence S. Krieger & Kennon M. Sheldon, What Makes Lawyers Happy: A Data-driven Prescription to Redefine Professional Success, 83 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 554, 560 (2014) (“Most particularly, in the context of the previous law school studies, the current data show that the psychological factors seen to erode during law school are the very factors most important for the well-being of lawyers.”); see also Todd David Peterson & Elizabeth Waters Peterson, Stemming the tide of law student depression: What law schools need to learn from the science of positive psychology, 9 YALE J. HEALTH POL’Y L. & ETHICS 357 (2009); Jerome M. Organ, David B. Jaffe & Katherine M. Bender, Suffering in silence: The survey of law student well-being and the reluctance of law students to seek help for substance use and mental health concerns, 66 J. LEGAL EDUC. 116 (2016), https://jle.aals.org/cgi/viewcontent .cgi?article=1370&context=home [https://perma.cc/A9H9-Q2NG]; Kennon M. Sheldon & Lawrence S. Krieger, Does legal education have undermining effects on law students? Evaluating changes in motivation, values, and well‐being, 22 BEHAV. SCI. & L. 261 (2004). 5 G. Andrew H. Benjamin, Alfred Kaszniak, Bruce Sales & Stephen Shanfield, The Role of Legal Education in Producing Psychological Distress among Law Students and Lawyers, 11 AM. BAR FOUND. W O R K L I F E B A L A N C E","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work-Life Balance and the Need to Give Law Students a Break\",\"authors\":\"J. Todres\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/lawreview.2022.848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health. Research shows that attorneys experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues at higher rates than the general population. Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being. We have known for years that students’ happiness and well-being tends to decline over their law school years, yet the response by most law schools has been patchwork, slow, and largely reactive. An unhealthy work-life balance remains the norm. This Article calls on law schools to do more to create a climate and culture in which students can achieve a healthier work-life balance. While there are a range of issues that need to be addressed, this Article focuses on the specific issue of law school culture discouraging taking time off. Ultimately, if law students—the newest members of our profession—are going to achieve and maintain a healthy work-life balance, it is not enough for law schools to simply encourage students to take care of themselves. Law school faculty and administrators need to create the conditions in which self-care is not only possible but welcome. A key component of that includes enabling students to take time off. * Jonathan Todres is a Distinguished University Professor and Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law. Thank you to Meera Deo, Jakki Petzold, and the Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) for their generosity in sharing LSSSE survey data and, more generally, for their important work on law student well-being issues. Thank you also to Caren Morrison and Nirej Sekhon for their helpful feedback on this Article and to Lauren Meeler for her excellent research assistance and valuable perspective on these issues. Finally, and most important, I want to thank the students in my Spring 2021 seminar for taking this journey with me. The legal profession is very fortunate to count you among its members. U N I V E R S I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G H L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E P A G E | 2 | V O L . 8 3 | 2 0 2 2 ISSN 1942-8405 (online) ● DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.848 http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu INTRODUCTION One of the most worthwhile assignments I have given to students in the past fifteen years was to stop working. Literally. I assigned them a 72-hour break from work.1 I did this out of growing concern that law schools are not doing enough to address the nonstop nature of the law school work culture and its adverse effects on student well-being. It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health.2 Research shows that “lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”3 Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being.4 We have known for a while that students’ happiness and wellbeing tends to decline over their law school years.5 Although law schools have 1 Jonathan Todres, An “Alternative Assignment” for Law Students, JONATHAN TODRES (Apr. 27, 2021), http://jonathantodres.com/blog/2021/4/27/an-alternative-assignment-for-law-students [https://perma.cc/ 7AF5-LG6R]; see also infra Part II. 2 Jerome M. Organ, What Do We Know About the Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction of Lawyers? A MetaAnalysis of Research on Lawyer Satisfaction and Well-Being, 8 U. ST. THOMAS L.J. 225, 268 (2011) (“[T]he fact that roughly 80% of lawyers consistently describe themselves as being ‘satisfied’ still has to be reconciled with the separate empirical data that indicates lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”); William W. Eaton et al., Occupations and the Prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder, 32 J. OCCUPATIONAL MED. 1079, 1083 (1990) (Of all professionals in the United States, lawyers suffer from the highest rate of depression after adjusting for socio-demographic factors, and they are 3.6 times more likely to suffer from major depressive disorder than the rest of the employed population.); Martin E.P. Seligman, Paul R. Verkuil & Terry H. Kang, Why Lawyers Are Unhappy, 10 DEAKIN L. REV. 49, 53 (2005) (“Lawyers are also at a greater risk for heart disease, alcoholism and drug use than the general population.”). 3 Organ, supra note 2, at 268. 4 See, e.g., Lawrence S. Krieger & Kennon M. Sheldon, What Makes Lawyers Happy: A Data-driven Prescription to Redefine Professional Success, 83 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 554, 560 (2014) (“Most particularly, in the context of the previous law school studies, the current data show that the psychological factors seen to erode during law school are the very factors most important for the well-being of lawyers.”); see also Todd David Peterson & Elizabeth Waters Peterson, Stemming the tide of law student depression: What law schools need to learn from the science of positive psychology, 9 YALE J. HEALTH POL’Y L. & ETHICS 357 (2009); Jerome M. Organ, David B. Jaffe & Katherine M. Bender, Suffering in silence: The survey of law student well-being and the reluctance of law students to seek help for substance use and mental health concerns, 66 J. LEGAL EDUC. 116 (2016), https://jle.aals.org/cgi/viewcontent .cgi?article=1370&context=home [https://perma.cc/A9H9-Q2NG]; Kennon M. Sheldon & Lawrence S. Krieger, Does legal education have undermining effects on law students? Evaluating changes in motivation, values, and well‐being, 22 BEHAV. SCI. & L. 261 (2004). 5 G. Andrew H. Benjamin, Alfred Kaszniak, Bruce Sales & Stephen Shanfield, The Role of Legal Education in Producing Psychological Distress among Law Students and Lawyers, 11 AM. BAR FOUND. W O R K L I F E B A L A N C E\",\"PeriodicalId\":44686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.848\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们早就明白,加入和留在法律行业对健康不利。研究表明,律师经历酗酒、抑郁和其他心理健康问题的比率高于普通人群。同样,有大量研究表明,法学院对许多学生的幸福感产生了不利影响。多年来,我们都知道学生的幸福感和幸福感在法学院期间往往会下降,但大多数法学院的反应都是拼凑的、缓慢的,而且大多是被动的。不健康的工作与生活平衡仍然是常态。这篇文章呼吁法学院采取更多措施,创造一种氛围和文化,让学生能够实现更健康的工作与生活平衡。虽然有一系列问题需要解决,但这篇文章关注的是法学院文化中不鼓励休假的具体问题。最终,如果法学院学生——我们这个行业的最新成员——要实现并保持健康的工作与生活平衡,仅仅鼓励学生照顾好自己是不够的。法学院的教职员工和管理人员需要创造条件,让自我照顾不仅成为可能,而且受到欢迎。其中的一个关键组成部分包括让学生休假。*乔纳森·托德雷斯是佐治亚州立大学法学院的杰出大学教授和法学教授。感谢Meera Deo、Jakki Petzold和法学院学生参与度调查(LSSSE)慷慨分享LSSSE调查数据,更广泛地说,感谢他们在法学院学生幸福问题上所做的重要工作。也感谢Caren Morrison和Nirej Sekhon对本文的有益反馈,以及Lauren Meeler对这些问题的出色研究协助和宝贵观点。最后,也是最重要的一点,我要感谢参加2021年春季研讨会的学生们与我一起踏上这段旅程。法律界非常幸运,有你们在其中。U N I V E R S I T Y O F P I T S B U R G H L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E P A G E |2|V O L。8 3 | 2 0 2 2 ISSN 1942-8405(在线)● DOI 10.5195/法律审查.2022.848http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu引言在过去的十五年里,我给学生们做的最有价值的作业之一就是停止工作。字面上我给他们安排了72小时的休息时间。1我这样做是因为我越来越担心法学院在解决法学院工作文化的不间断性及其对学生福祉的不利影响方面做得不够。长期以来,人们一直认为,加入和继续从事法律职业对健康不利。2研究表明,“律师过度酗酒、抑郁和其他心理健康问题。”3同样,有大量研究表明,法学院对许多学生的幸福感产生了不利影响。4我们早就知道,学生的幸福和幸福感在法学院的几年里往往会下降。5尽管法学院有1 Jonathan Todres,《法学院学生的“替代作业”》,Jonathan Todres(2021年4月27日),http://jonathantodres.com/blog/2021/4/27/an-alternative-assignment-for-law-students[https://perma.cc/7AF5-LG6R];另见下文第二部分。2 Jerome M.Organ,我们对律师的满意度/不满意度了解多少?《律师满意度和幸福感研究的元分析》,8 U.ST.THOMAS L.J.225268(2011)(“大约80%的律师一直认为自己‘满意’,但这一事实仍需与单独的经验数据相一致,这些数据表明律师过多地经历酗酒、抑郁和其他心理健康问题。”);William W.Eaton等人,《职业与重度抑郁症的患病率》,《职业医学杂志》,第32期,第1079页,第1083页(1990年)(在美国所有专业人士中,律师在调整社会人口因素后患抑郁症的几率最高,他们患重度抑郁症的可能性是其他就业人群的3.6倍);Martin E.P.Seligman、Paul R.Verkuil和Terry H.Kang,《为什么律师不高兴》,10 DEAKIN L.REV.49,53(2005)(“律师患心脏病、酗酒和吸毒的风险也比普通人群更大。”)。3器官,前注2,第268页。4参见Lawrence S.Krieger和Kennon M.Sheldon,《什么让律师快乐:重新定义职业成功的数据驱动处方》,83 GEO。WASH.L.修订版554560(2014)(“尤其是在之前法学院研究的背景下,目前的数据表明,在法学院期间被认为受到侵蚀的心理因素是对律师福祉最重要的因素。 ”);另见Todd David Peterson和Elizabeth Waters Peterson,《遏制法学院学生抑郁的浪潮:法学院需要从积极心理学中学习什么》,9 YALE J.HEALTH POL'Y L.&ETICS 357(2009);Jerome M.Organ、David B.Jaffe和Katherine M.Bender,《沉默中的痛苦:法学院学生的幸福感和法学院学生因药物使用和心理健康问题不愿寻求帮助的调查》,66 J.LEGAL EDUC。116(2016),https://jle.aals.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1370&context=home[https://perma.cc/A9H9-Q2NG];Kennon M.Sheldon和Lawrence S.Krieger,法律教育对法律系学生有破坏作用吗?评估动机、价值观和幸福感的变化,22 BEHAV。科学与L.261(2004)。5 G.Andrew H.Benjamin、Alfred Kaszniak、Bruce Sales和Stephen Shanfield,《法律教育在法学院学生和律师产生心理困扰中的作用》,上午11点。W O R K L I F E B A L A N C E
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Work-Life Balance and the Need to Give Law Students a Break
It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health. Research shows that attorneys experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues at higher rates than the general population. Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being. We have known for years that students’ happiness and well-being tends to decline over their law school years, yet the response by most law schools has been patchwork, slow, and largely reactive. An unhealthy work-life balance remains the norm. This Article calls on law schools to do more to create a climate and culture in which students can achieve a healthier work-life balance. While there are a range of issues that need to be addressed, this Article focuses on the specific issue of law school culture discouraging taking time off. Ultimately, if law students—the newest members of our profession—are going to achieve and maintain a healthy work-life balance, it is not enough for law schools to simply encourage students to take care of themselves. Law school faculty and administrators need to create the conditions in which self-care is not only possible but welcome. A key component of that includes enabling students to take time off. * Jonathan Todres is a Distinguished University Professor and Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law. Thank you to Meera Deo, Jakki Petzold, and the Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) for their generosity in sharing LSSSE survey data and, more generally, for their important work on law student well-being issues. Thank you also to Caren Morrison and Nirej Sekhon for their helpful feedback on this Article and to Lauren Meeler for her excellent research assistance and valuable perspective on these issues. Finally, and most important, I want to thank the students in my Spring 2021 seminar for taking this journey with me. The legal profession is very fortunate to count you among its members. U N I V E R S I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G H L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E P A G E | 2 | V O L . 8 3 | 2 0 2 2 ISSN 1942-8405 (online) ● DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.848 http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu INTRODUCTION One of the most worthwhile assignments I have given to students in the past fifteen years was to stop working. Literally. I assigned them a 72-hour break from work.1 I did this out of growing concern that law schools are not doing enough to address the nonstop nature of the law school work culture and its adverse effects on student well-being. It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health.2 Research shows that “lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”3 Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being.4 We have known for a while that students’ happiness and wellbeing tends to decline over their law school years.5 Although law schools have 1 Jonathan Todres, An “Alternative Assignment” for Law Students, JONATHAN TODRES (Apr. 27, 2021), http://jonathantodres.com/blog/2021/4/27/an-alternative-assignment-for-law-students [https://perma.cc/ 7AF5-LG6R]; see also infra Part II. 2 Jerome M. Organ, What Do We Know About the Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction of Lawyers? A MetaAnalysis of Research on Lawyer Satisfaction and Well-Being, 8 U. ST. THOMAS L.J. 225, 268 (2011) (“[T]he fact that roughly 80% of lawyers consistently describe themselves as being ‘satisfied’ still has to be reconciled with the separate empirical data that indicates lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”); William W. Eaton et al., Occupations and the Prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder, 32 J. OCCUPATIONAL MED. 1079, 1083 (1990) (Of all professionals in the United States, lawyers suffer from the highest rate of depression after adjusting for socio-demographic factors, and they are 3.6 times more likely to suffer from major depressive disorder than the rest of the employed population.); Martin E.P. Seligman, Paul R. Verkuil & Terry H. Kang, Why Lawyers Are Unhappy, 10 DEAKIN L. REV. 49, 53 (2005) (“Lawyers are also at a greater risk for heart disease, alcoholism and drug use than the general population.”). 3 Organ, supra note 2, at 268. 4 See, e.g., Lawrence S. Krieger & Kennon M. Sheldon, What Makes Lawyers Happy: A Data-driven Prescription to Redefine Professional Success, 83 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 554, 560 (2014) (“Most particularly, in the context of the previous law school studies, the current data show that the psychological factors seen to erode during law school are the very factors most important for the well-being of lawyers.”); see also Todd David Peterson & Elizabeth Waters Peterson, Stemming the tide of law student depression: What law schools need to learn from the science of positive psychology, 9 YALE J. HEALTH POL’Y L. & ETHICS 357 (2009); Jerome M. Organ, David B. Jaffe & Katherine M. Bender, Suffering in silence: The survey of law student well-being and the reluctance of law students to seek help for substance use and mental health concerns, 66 J. LEGAL EDUC. 116 (2016), https://jle.aals.org/cgi/viewcontent .cgi?article=1370&context=home [https://perma.cc/A9H9-Q2NG]; Kennon M. Sheldon & Lawrence S. Krieger, Does legal education have undermining effects on law students? Evaluating changes in motivation, values, and well‐being, 22 BEHAV. SCI. & L. 261 (2004). 5 G. Andrew H. Benjamin, Alfred Kaszniak, Bruce Sales & Stephen Shanfield, The Role of Legal Education in Producing Psychological Distress among Law Students and Lawyers, 11 AM. BAR FOUND. W O R K L I F E B A L A N C E
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Law Review is a student-run journal of legal scholarship that publishes quarterly. Our goal is to contribute to the legal community by featuring pertinent articles that highlight current legal issues and changes in the law. The Law Review publishes articles, comments, book reviews, and notes on a wide variety of topics, including constitutional law, securities regulation, criminal procedure, family law, international law, and jurisprudence. The Law Review has also hosted several symposia, bringing scholars into one setting for lively debate and discussion of key legal topics.
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: The "Hard Problem" of U.S. Constitutional Law Criminal Justice Technology and the Regulatory Sandbox: Toward Balancing Justice, Accountability, and Innovation From Past to Present: Funding the Pennsylvania Public Education System The Federal Courts Are Not Bias Free Zones: An Argument for Eliminating Diversity Jurisdiction Urgenda vs. Juliana: Lessons for Future Climate Change Litigation Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1