商标侵权:鼓当嘎拉姆诉鼓当巴鲁案分析及其全球启示

Rechtsidee Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.21070/jihr.v12i2.992
Goesman Goesman, Markoni Markoni
{"title":"商标侵权:鼓当嘎拉姆诉鼓当巴鲁案分析及其全球启示","authors":"Goesman Goesman, Markoni Markoni","doi":"10.21070/jihr.v12i2.992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study conducts a qualitative analysis of the trademark dispute between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru concerning brand names and imagery on products, employing a case study method alongside normative legal and conceptual approaches. The research delves into the judges' legal considerations and the trademark rights arrangement, focusing on Gudang Garam, a renowned brand. The results establish that Gudang Baru violated the 2016 trademark registration provisions (Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law N 20 and Article 18 Paragraph (3) of Ministerial Regulation No. 67), prompting the Intellectual Property Office to reject all applications. This case underlines the importance of respecting well-established brands and legal implications for trademark registrations, informing future practices in the field.Highlights: \n \nViolation of trademark registration provisions by Gudang Baru. \nEnforcement of the trademark rights of well-known brand Gudang Garam. \nLegal implications influencing future trademark registration practices. \n \nKeywords: Trademark Dispute, Gudang Garam, Gudang Baru, Trademark Registration, Legal Implications. \n ","PeriodicalId":31020,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsidee","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trademark Infringement: An Analysis of the Gudang Garam versus Gudang Baru Case and Its Global Implications\",\"authors\":\"Goesman Goesman, Markoni Markoni\",\"doi\":\"10.21070/jihr.v12i2.992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study conducts a qualitative analysis of the trademark dispute between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru concerning brand names and imagery on products, employing a case study method alongside normative legal and conceptual approaches. The research delves into the judges' legal considerations and the trademark rights arrangement, focusing on Gudang Garam, a renowned brand. The results establish that Gudang Baru violated the 2016 trademark registration provisions (Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law N 20 and Article 18 Paragraph (3) of Ministerial Regulation No. 67), prompting the Intellectual Property Office to reject all applications. This case underlines the importance of respecting well-established brands and legal implications for trademark registrations, informing future practices in the field.Highlights: \\n \\nViolation of trademark registration provisions by Gudang Baru. \\nEnforcement of the trademark rights of well-known brand Gudang Garam. \\nLegal implications influencing future trademark registration practices. \\n \\nKeywords: Trademark Dispute, Gudang Garam, Gudang Baru, Trademark Registration, Legal Implications. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":31020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rechtsidee\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rechtsidee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsidee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用案例研究的方法,结合规范的法律和概念研究的方法,对鼓当嘎拉姆和鼓当巴鲁之间关于品牌名称和产品形象的商标纠纷进行定性分析。本研究以知名品牌“鼓当嘎拉姆”为研究对象,探讨了法官的法律考量和商标权安排。结果认定,鼓当巴鲁违反了2016年《商标法》第20条第1款和部颁法规第67号第18款第3项的商标注册规定,知识产权局驳回了所有申请。这个案例强调了尊重成熟品牌和商标注册的法律影响的重要性,为该领域的未来实践提供了信息。重点:鼓当巴鲁违反商标注册规定。知名品牌“鼓当加兰”商标权的执行。影响未来商标注册实践的法律含义。关键词:商标纠纷,鼓当Garam,鼓当Baru,商标注册,法律含义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trademark Infringement: An Analysis of the Gudang Garam versus Gudang Baru Case and Its Global Implications
This study conducts a qualitative analysis of the trademark dispute between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru concerning brand names and imagery on products, employing a case study method alongside normative legal and conceptual approaches. The research delves into the judges' legal considerations and the trademark rights arrangement, focusing on Gudang Garam, a renowned brand. The results establish that Gudang Baru violated the 2016 trademark registration provisions (Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law N 20 and Article 18 Paragraph (3) of Ministerial Regulation No. 67), prompting the Intellectual Property Office to reject all applications. This case underlines the importance of respecting well-established brands and legal implications for trademark registrations, informing future practices in the field.Highlights: Violation of trademark registration provisions by Gudang Baru. Enforcement of the trademark rights of well-known brand Gudang Garam. Legal implications influencing future trademark registration practices. Keywords: Trademark Dispute, Gudang Garam, Gudang Baru, Trademark Registration, Legal Implications.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digitalization of the Legal System: Opportunities and Challenges for Indonesia Addressing Multi-Unit Residential Management Conflicts: A Legal Study Evaluating Airline Liability and Compensation in Indonesian Aviation Challenges in Protecting Trafficking Victims' Rights in Indonesia Policy Formulation of Fraud Offenses in the New Penal Code Concept for Combating Technology-Related Crimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1