探讨美国社区调查中家庭调查受访者的负担认知

IF 0.5 4区 数学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Journal of Official Statistics Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/jos-2022-0050
J. Holzberg, Jonathan Katz
{"title":"探讨美国社区调查中家庭调查受访者的负担认知","authors":"J. Holzberg, Jonathan Katz","doi":"10.2478/jos-2022-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Minimizing respondent survey burden may help decrease nonresponse and increase data quality, but the measurement of burden has varied widely. Recent efforts have paid more attention to respondents’ subjective perceptions of burden, measured through the addition of questions to a survey. Despite reliance on these questions as key measures, little qualitative research has been conducted for household surveys. This study used focus groups to examine respondents’ reactions to possible sources of burden in the American Community Survey (ACS) such as survey length, sensitivity, and contact strategy; respondents’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about burden; and overall perceptions of burden. Feedback was used to guide subsequent selection and cognitive testing of questions on subjective perceptions of burden. Generally, respondents did not find the ACS to be burdensome. When deciding whether it was burdensome, respondents thought about the process of responding to the questionnaire, the value of the data, that response is mandatory, and to a lesser extent, the contacts they received, suggesting these constructs are key components of burden in the ACS. There were some differences by response mode and household characteristics. Findings reinforce the importance of conducting qualitative research to ensure questions capture important respondent burden perceptions for a particular survey.","PeriodicalId":51092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Official Statistics","volume":"38 1","pages":"1177 - 1203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Burden Perceptions of Household Survey Respondents in the American Community Survey\",\"authors\":\"J. Holzberg, Jonathan Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jos-2022-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Minimizing respondent survey burden may help decrease nonresponse and increase data quality, but the measurement of burden has varied widely. Recent efforts have paid more attention to respondents’ subjective perceptions of burden, measured through the addition of questions to a survey. Despite reliance on these questions as key measures, little qualitative research has been conducted for household surveys. This study used focus groups to examine respondents’ reactions to possible sources of burden in the American Community Survey (ACS) such as survey length, sensitivity, and contact strategy; respondents’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about burden; and overall perceptions of burden. Feedback was used to guide subsequent selection and cognitive testing of questions on subjective perceptions of burden. Generally, respondents did not find the ACS to be burdensome. When deciding whether it was burdensome, respondents thought about the process of responding to the questionnaire, the value of the data, that response is mandatory, and to a lesser extent, the contacts they received, suggesting these constructs are key components of burden in the ACS. There were some differences by response mode and household characteristics. Findings reinforce the importance of conducting qualitative research to ensure questions capture important respondent burden perceptions for a particular survey.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Official Statistics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1177 - 1203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Official Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2022-0050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Official Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2022-0050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要最小化受访者调查负担可能有助于减少无回复并提高数据质量,但负担的衡量标准差异很大。最近的努力更加关注受访者对负担的主观感知,通过在调查中添加问题来衡量。尽管依赖这些问题作为关键衡量标准,但很少对家庭调查进行定性研究。这项研究使用焦点小组来检查受访者对美国社区调查(ACS)中可能的负担来源的反应,如调查长度、敏感性和联系策略;受访者对负担的知识、态度和信念;以及对负担的总体看法。反馈被用于指导随后对主观负担感知问题的选择和认知测试。一般来说,受访者并不认为ACS是一种负担。在决定这是否是负担时,受访者考虑了问卷的回复过程、数据的价值、该回复是强制性的,以及在较小程度上,他们收到的联系,这表明这些结构是ACS负担的关键组成部分。在反应模式和家庭特征方面存在一些差异。调查结果强化了进行定性研究的重要性,以确保问题能够反映特定调查中受访者对负担的重要看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Burden Perceptions of Household Survey Respondents in the American Community Survey
Abstract Minimizing respondent survey burden may help decrease nonresponse and increase data quality, but the measurement of burden has varied widely. Recent efforts have paid more attention to respondents’ subjective perceptions of burden, measured through the addition of questions to a survey. Despite reliance on these questions as key measures, little qualitative research has been conducted for household surveys. This study used focus groups to examine respondents’ reactions to possible sources of burden in the American Community Survey (ACS) such as survey length, sensitivity, and contact strategy; respondents’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about burden; and overall perceptions of burden. Feedback was used to guide subsequent selection and cognitive testing of questions on subjective perceptions of burden. Generally, respondents did not find the ACS to be burdensome. When deciding whether it was burdensome, respondents thought about the process of responding to the questionnaire, the value of the data, that response is mandatory, and to a lesser extent, the contacts they received, suggesting these constructs are key components of burden in the ACS. There were some differences by response mode and household characteristics. Findings reinforce the importance of conducting qualitative research to ensure questions capture important respondent burden perceptions for a particular survey.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Official Statistics
Journal of Official Statistics STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JOS is an international quarterly published by Statistics Sweden. We publish research articles in the area of survey and statistical methodology and policy matters facing national statistical offices and other producers of statistics. The intended readers are researchers or practicians at statistical agencies or in universities and private organizations dealing with problems which concern aspects of production of official statistics.
期刊最新文献
Reliable event rates for disease mapping. Application of Sampling Variance Smoothing Methods for Small Area Proportion Estimation Answering Current Challenges of and Changes in Producing Official Time Use Statistics Using the Data Collection Platform MOTUS Small Area with Multiply Imputed Survey Data Temporally Consistent Present Population from Mobile Network Signaling Data for Official Statistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1