{"title":"立陶宛和拉脱维亚樟子松边材年轮的估算","authors":"A. Vitas, M. Zunde","doi":"10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Pinus sylvestris L. is the predominant tree species used for wooden constructions in the Baltic area. Accordingly, the timber of Pinus is the most important object for investigation and dating carried out by dendrochronologists of the Baltic countries. However, the dating of historical Pinus is often challenging when the outer sapwood rings are missing in the wood samples. In Pinus, sapwood rings increase in number as the tree ages, and therefore calculating the approximate number of missing outer rings from a set range, a technique used for oak, is not possible. In Norway, a simple method for estimating the number of sapwood rings has been developed for some native species of conifers. The aim of this small-scale study was to assess the validity and the practical suitability of the Norwegian method for estimating the number of missing sapwood rings of mostly historical Pinus wood samples obtained in the southeastern part of the Baltic region. Our findings indicate that this method is not acceptable for estimating the number of missing sapwood rings for individual trees, but suggest that it may be applicable when dating tree-ring chronologies for a minimum of 20 trees, containing individuals up to 200 years old.","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SAPWOOD RINGS ESTIMATION FOR PINUS SYLVESTRIS L. IN LITHUANIA AND LATVIA\",\"authors\":\"A. Vitas, M. Zunde\",\"doi\":\"10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Pinus sylvestris L. is the predominant tree species used for wooden constructions in the Baltic area. Accordingly, the timber of Pinus is the most important object for investigation and dating carried out by dendrochronologists of the Baltic countries. However, the dating of historical Pinus is often challenging when the outer sapwood rings are missing in the wood samples. In Pinus, sapwood rings increase in number as the tree ages, and therefore calculating the approximate number of missing outer rings from a set range, a technique used for oak, is not possible. In Norway, a simple method for estimating the number of sapwood rings has been developed for some native species of conifers. The aim of this small-scale study was to assess the validity and the practical suitability of the Norwegian method for estimating the number of missing sapwood rings of mostly historical Pinus wood samples obtained in the southeastern part of the Baltic region. Our findings indicate that this method is not acceptable for estimating the number of missing sapwood rings for individual trees, but suggest that it may be applicable when dating tree-ring chronologies for a minimum of 20 trees, containing individuals up to 200 years old.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
SAPWOOD RINGS ESTIMATION FOR PINUS SYLVESTRIS L. IN LITHUANIA AND LATVIA
ABSTRACT Pinus sylvestris L. is the predominant tree species used for wooden constructions in the Baltic area. Accordingly, the timber of Pinus is the most important object for investigation and dating carried out by dendrochronologists of the Baltic countries. However, the dating of historical Pinus is often challenging when the outer sapwood rings are missing in the wood samples. In Pinus, sapwood rings increase in number as the tree ages, and therefore calculating the approximate number of missing outer rings from a set range, a technique used for oak, is not possible. In Norway, a simple method for estimating the number of sapwood rings has been developed for some native species of conifers. The aim of this small-scale study was to assess the validity and the practical suitability of the Norwegian method for estimating the number of missing sapwood rings of mostly historical Pinus wood samples obtained in the southeastern part of the Baltic region. Our findings indicate that this method is not acceptable for estimating the number of missing sapwood rings for individual trees, but suggest that it may be applicable when dating tree-ring chronologies for a minimum of 20 trees, containing individuals up to 200 years old.
期刊介绍:
Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication.
Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.